Grade by Grade
D. Canada, 1945–1982 · Canada, 1945–1982

Sleeping With an Elephant: Canada–U.S. Relations, 1945–1982

D2.5 D1.3 A1.6 A1.7About 65 minutes
Learning goals
  • I can describe key developments in Canada–U.S. relations from 1945 to 1982.
  • I can explain how each development reinforced or challenged the relationship.
  • I can explain who inside Canada gained or lost from joint projects.
  • I can make and defend a judgement about the relationship with evidence.

Words to know

tariff
A tax on imported goods.
Auto Pact
The 1965 Canada–U.S. agreement removing tariffs on new cars and parts traded by car companies.
St. Lawrence Seaway
A joint Canada–U.S. system of locks and channels opened in 1959 linking the Atlantic and the Great Lakes.
surcharge
An extra tax or fee added on top of a price.
Third Option
A 1972 policy idea to reduce dependence on the U.S. by trading more with other countries.
acid rain
Rain made acidic by air pollution, which harms lakes, fish and forests.
continental defence
Canada and the U.S. defending North America together.

Sleeping with an elephant

In 1969, speaking to journalists in Washington, Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau described the relationship this way:

"Living next to you is in some ways like sleeping with an elephant. No matter how friendly and even-tempered is the beast, if I can call it that, one is affected by every twitch and grunt."

After 1945, the United States replaced Britain as Canada's most important partner in defence, trade, investment and culture. The relationship brought security and prosperity, but it also raised a question that Canadians argued about for the whole period: How close is too close? In this lesson you will sort developments into cooperation and tension, and judge how the relationship changed.

Building together

  • The St. Lawrence Seaway (opened 1959): a system of locks, canals and channels that let ocean-going ships travel from the Atlantic to the Great Lakes. It was built jointly by Canada and the U.S., and opened by Queen Elizabeth II and President Dwight Eisenhower. It boosted shipping and produced hydroelectric power, but building it flooded riverside villages in Ontario (the "Lost Villages") and affected the Mohawk community of Akwesasne and Kahnawà:ke, whose lands and access to the river were changed.
  • Continental defence: NORAD and the DEW Line (from the Cold War lesson) tied Canadian and U.S. air defence together.
  • The Auto Pact (1965): an agreement that removed tariffs on new cars and parts traded between the two countries by the car companies, as long as the companies kept a certain level of production in Canada. Southern Ontario's auto industry grew strongly.
  • The Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement (1972): the two countries agreed to clean up the badly polluted Great Lakes, for example by limiting phosphates from detergents.
How the Auto Pact changed car makingBefore 1965• tariffs (taxes) on cars and partscrossing the border• Canadian plants built manymodels in small numbers• higher costs, higher pricesAfter the 1965 Auto Pact• no tariffs on new cars and partsfor the companies• Canadian plants specialize ina few models for all ofNorth America• more jobs1965
The Auto Pact let Canadian factories build fewer models in bigger numbers for the whole continent, which cut costs and added jobs.

Tensions and disagreements

  • The Avro Arrow (1959): Canada relied instead on American Bomarc missiles (chosen in 1958) and later bought American fighter jets. Critics said Canada had given up its own defence industry to depend on the U.S.
  • Nuclear warheads (1963): the debate over putting U.S. nuclear warheads on Canadian Bomarc missiles helped bring down the Diefenbaker government.
  • The Cuban Missile Crisis (1962): Diefenbaker's delay in putting Canadian forces on alert angered President Kennedy.
  • Vietnam (1960s–1970s): many Canadians opposed the war; Pearson's 1965 call for a bombing pause angered President Johnson; Canada welcomed many American war resisters.
  • Economic shocks: in 1971, President Nixon placed a 10 percent surcharge on many imports to the U.S., without exempting Canada. In response, Canada's government proposed a "Third Option" (1972): trade more with Europe and Japan to reduce dependence on the U.S. (it had limited success).
  • Acid rain (late 1970s–1980s): pollution from power plants and smelters, much of it from the U.S. Midwest, drifted north and fell as acid rain, harming lakes and forests in Ontario and Quebec. Canada pushed for action; the U.S. was slow to agree. Canada's own smelters, such as those in Sudbury, also caused acid rain, so both countries had work to do.
  • Culture: American magazines, TV and movies filled Canadian homes. Many Canadians worried about losing a distinct Canadian identity. (You will see Canada's responses in the lesson on arts and culture.)
Canada–U.S. relations: cooperation or tension?more cooperationmore tensionSt. Lawrence Seaway (1959)Auto Pact (1965)Great Lakes water deal (1972)NORAD (1957–58)Avro Arrow cancelled (1959)Bomarc warheads debate (1963)Vietnam; Pearson's speech (1965)Acid rain dispute (late 1970s on)Cuban Missile Crisis delay (1962)Placement is a judgement, not a measurement: you may argue for different spots.
Each event is placed by judgement. Notice that cooperation and tension happened at the same time: the relationship was never only one or the other.
Worked example

Modelled example: Did it challenge or reinforce the relationship?

Decide whether the St. Lawrence Seaway challenged or reinforced the Canada–U.S. relationship, and for whom.

  1. Describe it: a joint project, opened in 1959, that connected the Atlantic to the Great Lakes for large ships.
  2. Evidence it reinforced the relationship: both governments planned, paid for and opened it together; it increased trade between the two countries and produced power for both.
  3. Evidence of costs: villages along the river in Ontario were flooded and about 6 500 people were moved; Mohawk communities at Akwesasne and Kahnawà:ke lost land and access to the river without meaningful consent.
  4. Judge: for the two governments, it reinforced cooperation. For communities that lost land, it was a project done to them, not with them.

The Seaway reinforced Canada–U.S. cooperation, but the benefits and costs were not shared equally inside Canada.

Just for fun

A funny-but-true fact: a ship sailing from Montreal to Lake Superior has to climb more than 170 metres, about the height of a 55-storey building. It does it on a staircase made of water: the locks of the St. Lawrence Seaway, the Welland Canal and the Soo Locks.

Hands-on activity

Elephant in the room: a two-sided chart

You need: a large sheet of paper, a pencil, and sticky notes or small pieces of paper.

  1. Draw a long line across the paper. Label the left end Cooperation and the right end Tension.
  2. Write each development from this lesson on its own sticky note (at least eight).
  3. Place each note on the line where you think it belongs. Discuss your placements with a family member. Do they agree?
  4. Choose the two notes you placed farthest apart. For each, write one sentence of evidence for its position.
  5. Finish with a one-sentence judgement: Between 1945 and 1982, the Canada–U.S. relationship was mostly... and explain why.

What to look for: reasons based on evidence, not only feelings, and a judgement that admits some developments had both cooperation and tension.

Your turn

1

What did Trudeau mean by "sleeping with an elephant"?

2

What was the St. Lawrence Seaway, and when did it open?

3

What did the 1965 Auto Pact do?

4

Give two examples of Canada–U.S. tension in the 1960s.

5

What was the "Third Option"?

6

Why was acid rain a Canada–U.S. issue?

More practice: warm-up

1

Who opened the St. Lawrence Seaway with Queen Elizabeth II?

2

In what year was the Auto Pact signed?

3

Which lakes did the 1972 water quality agreement aim to clean?

4

Which U.S. president placed a surcharge on imports in 1971?

5

Name an Ontario city whose smelters also contributed to acid rain.

More practice: on your own

1

Who gained most from the Auto Pact, and was anyone left out?

2

Why did the Nixon surcharge of 1971 worry Canadians so much?

3

How did the Seaway affect Mohawk communities?

4

Explain why acid rain was an example of both conflict and later cooperation.

5

Why might an Ontario autoworker and an Alberta oil worker in 1975 see the U.S. relationship differently?

Challenge

1

Write a thesis on: "Between 1945 and 1982, Canada became more dependent on the United States." Support it with two pieces of evidence and address one counter-argument.

2

Is "the Avro Arrow was cancelled because of the Americans" a fair claim? Explain.

3

Which development in this lesson best shows continuity in Canada–U.S. relations from 1945 to 1982? Defend your choice.

Check your understanding

Quiz

1.

What did Trudeau's "sleeping with an elephant" comparison mean?

2.

The St. Lawrence Seaway (1959) is best described as:

3.

What did the Auto Pact (1965) do?

4.

Which is the best example of tension in Canada–U.S. relations?

5.

What was the purpose of the "Third Option" (1972)?

6.

Who was harmed by the construction of the St. Lawrence Seaway?

For parents and teachers

Big idea: Students describe key developments in Canada–U.S. relations from 1945 to 1982 and explain how they challenged or reinforced the relationship (D2.5), linking to the economy (D1.3). The skill is making and defending judgements (A1.6), shown in the cooperation-tension scale.

How to help: Do the sticky-note activity together and disagree on purpose: ask your teen to defend a placement. Talk about how Canada–U.S. relations show up in the news today (trade, defence, the environment) and compare.

Common difficulties:

  • Seeing the relationship as all friendly or all hostile. It was both, often at once.
  • Forgetting that Canadian projects had uneven effects at home (the Seaway and Mohawk communities).
  • Mixing up the Auto Pact (1965) with later free trade agreements (1988 and 1994), which come in the next unit.