B. Civic Awareness · Civic Awareness: Democratic Values, Governance and RightsResponsibilities, Rights in Action and the Courts
B3.2 B3.3 B3.4 A2.1 A2.4About 75 minutes
Learning goals- I can analyse key responsibilities of Canadian citizenship.
- I can explain how people in Canada use their rights and freedoms to bring about positive social change, with examples.
- I can explain how the courts and other institutions affect individuals' rights and the public good.
- I can describe skills from civics that transfer to work and daily life, and careers where civics is an asset.
Words to know
responsibility
A duty or obligation, legal or moral, that comes with membership in a community.
jury
A group of citizens (12 in a criminal trial) who decide the facts of a case and whether the accused is guilty.
appeal
Asking a higher court to review a lower court's decision.
judicial review
A court's power to decide whether a law or government action follows the Constitution and the law.
tribunal
A specialized body, less formal than a court, that decides certain kinds of disputes, such as human rights or landlord-tenant cases.
ombudsman
An independent officer who investigates complaints about unfair treatment by government bodies.
public good
What benefits the community as a whole, such as safety, health and fair institutions.
A letter in the mail
One day, an adult in your home may get a letter from the court: a jury summons. It may be inconvenient. But without ordinary citizens willing to serve, the right to a trial by jury would mean nothing.
Rights and responsibilities go together. Your right to a fair trial depends on other people's responsibility to serve on juries. Your right to vote depends on others respecting election results. This lesson looks at the responsibilities of citizenship, how people use their rights to change things, and the institutions that protect rights.
Responsibilities of citizenship
The Government of Canada's citizenship guide lists these responsibilities:
- Obeying the law. No one is above the law.
- Taking responsibility for oneself and one's family: working, supporting your family, caring for your own well-being.
- Serving on a jury when called. In Ontario, jurors must be Canadian citizens aged 18 or older.
- Voting in federal, provincial and local elections.
- Helping others in the community, for example by volunteering.
- Protecting and enjoying our heritage and environment.
Some are legal duties (obeying the law, jury duty when summoned). Others are civic responsibilities that a healthy democracy needs but does not force: voting is not compulsory in Canada. There is no compulsory military service, though defending Canada through service in the Canadian Armed Forces or community emergency response is an honoured choice.
Analysing responsibilities means asking: Why does this responsibility matter? What happens if many people ignore it? For example, low voter turnout means a smaller group of people chooses the government for everyone.
Six responsibilities of Canadian citizenship. Some are legal duties; others are responsibilities a democracy relies on people to choose.Using rights to bring about positive change
Rights are not just shields; they are tools. People in Canada have used them to change laws and practices:
- SOS Montfort (Ontario): in 1997, a provincial commission ordered major cuts to the Montfort Hospital, a francophone hospital in Ottawa. Franco-Ontarians organized a huge campaign, with rallies and petitions, and went to court. In 2001 the Court of Appeal for Ontario ruled that the decision did not respect the constitutional principle of protecting minorities, and the hospital stayed open as a French-language hospital. Freedom of assembly, expression and the courts worked together.
- Eldridge (1997): Deaf patients in British Columbia argued that hospitals must provide sign language interpreters. The Supreme Court of Canada agreed under section 15 equality rights: without interpreters, Deaf patients did not receive equal health care.
- First Nations children (2016): the First Nations Child and Family Caring Society, led by Cindy Blackstock, and the Assembly of First Nations filed a human rights complaint. The Canadian Human Rights Tribunal found the federal government had discriminated against First Nations children on reserve by underfunding child and family services, and ordered changes, including to how Jordan's Principle is applied (so First Nations children get services without delays over which government pays).
Other tools include writing to representatives, organizing petitions, forming organizations (s. 2(d) freedom of association), voting, and running for office.
Rights are tools. Most successful campaigns use several at once: SOS Montfort combined rallies, petitions, media and a court case.Worked exampleModelled example: Choosing the right route
For each situation, which right or institution would a person use? (a) A landlord refuses to rent to a family because they have young children. (b) Students want the city to keep a youth drop-in centre open. (c) A person believes a provincial law about police stops violates their rights. (d) A resident feels a provincial ministry ignored her complaint unfairly.
- (a) A private landlord: use the Ontario Human Rights Code (family status) through the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.
- (b) A political decision: use freedom of expression and assembly (speak at council, start a petition, organize a peaceful rally), and contact councillors before the budget vote.
- (c) A law: use the courts to challenge it under the Charter (for example, sections 8 or 9), asking for a remedy under section 24 or a ruling under section 52.
- (d) Unfair treatment by a government body: complain to the Ombudsman Ontario, an independent officer of the legislature.
(a) Human rights code and tribunal; (b) expression, assembly and political action; (c) a Charter challenge in court; (d) the Ombudsman. Matching the problem to the right tool is half the battle.
Courts and other institutions
The courts protect rights and the public good by:
- deciding cases independently, using public rules and evidence;
- judicial review: striking down laws or government actions that violate the Constitution;
- balancing individual rights with the public good, such as public safety or health;
- protecting young people through a separate youth justice system under the Youth Criminal Justice Act, which applies to people aged 12 to 17 and focuses on rehabilitation and accountability.
Other institutions and organizations:
- Human rights commissions and tribunals: the Ontario Human Rights Commission promotes human rights; the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario decides complaints under the Ontario Human Rights Code (the first such code in Canada, 1962). Federally, the Canadian Human Rights Commission and Tribunal cover federally regulated areas.
- Ombudsman Ontario investigates complaints about provincial government organizations, municipalities and school boards.
- Privacy commissioners (federal and Ontario) protect personal information.
- Legal Aid Ontario helps people with low incomes get legal help.
- Police enforce the law, and must respect Charter rights.
- Civil society organizations, such as civil liberties associations, legal clinics and advocacy groups, take cases, intervene in court and inform the public.
Courts in Ontario and the federal courts. A case can be appealed up the arrows (simplified: some appeals first go to a different court), and the Supreme Court of Canada hears only some cases, usually ones it gives permission to appeal.Worked exampleModelled example: Rights versus the public good
During a serious public health emergency, a province limits large indoor gatherings. Some people say this violates freedom of assembly. How would a court think about it?
- Right involved: freedom of peaceful assembly (s. 2(c)), and perhaps freedom of religion (s. 2(a)) if places of worship are affected.
- Public good: protecting health and keeping hospitals from being overwhelmed.
- Section 1 analysis: Is the goal important? (yes). Is the limit connected to it? (crowds spread illness). Is it as small as reasonably possible? (for example, are outdoor or smaller gatherings allowed? is it temporary?). Do benefits outweigh harms?
- Outcome: the court's answer depends on the evidence and how narrowly the rule was written. A temporary, evidence-based rule is more likely to be justified than a permanent or very broad one.
Courts do not simply pick rights or the public good; they use section 1 to test whether a limit on rights is justified by evidence, proportionate and as narrow as reasonably possible.
Skills and careers
The political inquiry skills you are building transfer to work and everyday life: researching and checking sources, weighing evidence, understanding different perspectives, communicating clearly and persuasively, working in groups, and resolving disagreements respectfully. These are also skills of the citizenship education framework: active participation, a sense of identity and belonging, and understanding how structures work.
Careers where civics is an asset include: lawyer, paralegal, judge, court clerk, police officer, journalist, policy analyst, public servant, political staff member, diplomat, elections officer, social worker, community organizer, human rights officer, non-profit manager and teacher. In Grade 11 and 12, courses such as Understanding Canadian Law and Canadian and World Politics build on this course.
Just for funWhy did the lawyer bring a ladder to the courthouse?
To take the case to a higher court.
Hands-on activityRights and responsibilities in my week
You need: a notebook and a family member to interview.
- For seven days, record each time you use a right (for example, expressing an opinion, practising your religion, moving freely, going to a public school in English or French) and each time you meet a responsibility (obeying traffic rules, helping a neighbour, recycling, caring for a sibling).
- At the end of the week, count each. Which responsibilities did you meet without thinking about them?
- Interview a family member: Have you ever voted, served on a jury, volunteered, or contacted a government office or tribunal? What was it like?
- Choose one local problem. Using the "rights as tools" diagram, write a short plan: which two tools would you use, and in what order?
- Look up one career from the list. Write three skills it needs that you practised in this course.
What to look for: at least 10 entries over the week, an interview summary, a realistic two-tool plan, and three relevant skills.
Your turn
1List four responsibilities of Canadian citizenship.
Any four: obeying the law; taking responsibility for oneself and one's family; serving on a jury; voting; helping others in the community; protecting and enjoying heritage and the environment.
2Which responsibilities are legal duties, and which are civic responsibilities?
Legal duties: obeying the law and serving on a jury when summoned. Civic responsibilities: voting, helping others, protecting heritage and the environment, caring for yourself and family (partly legal for children's care).
3What was SOS Montfort, and what did it achieve?
A Franco-Ontarian campaign to save the Montfort Hospital in Ottawa from major cuts ordered in 1997. Through rallies, petitions and a court case, it won a 2001 Court of Appeal ruling that kept the hospital open as a French-language hospital.
4What did the Supreme Court decide in Eldridge (1997)?
That hospitals must provide sign language interpreters for Deaf patients when needed for effective communication, because equal health care is required by section 15.
A court's power to decide whether a law or government action follows the Constitution and the law, and to strike it down if not.
6What does Ombudsman Ontario do?
Investigates complaints about unfair treatment by provincial government organizations, municipalities and school boards.
7Name three careers where civics is an asset.
Any three: lawyer, paralegal, judge, court clerk, police officer, journalist, policy analyst, public servant, political staff, diplomat, elections officer, social worker, community organizer, human rights officer, teacher.
More practice: warm-up
1Is voting compulsory in Canada?
2How old must jurors be in Ontario?
18 or older (and Canadian citizens).
3What is the highest court in Canada?
The Supreme Court of Canada.
4To whom does the Youth Criminal Justice Act apply?
Young people aged 12 to 17.
5Which body decides complaints under the Ontario Human Rights Code?
The Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.
More practice: on your own
1Analyse why jury duty is a responsibility, not just an inconvenience.
The right to be judged by one's peers depends on citizens being willing to serve. Juries also bring community values into the justice system and check the power of the state. If people avoided it, trials could be delayed or juries would represent fewer people.
2Explain how the First Nations Child and Family Caring Society case shows a right being used to bring change.
The organization used the right to equal treatment (through the Canadian Human Rights Act) to file a complaint. The tribunal found discrimination and ordered the federal government to change funding and apply Jordan's Principle properly, improving access to services for First Nations children.
3Why does judicial independence matter for protecting minority rights?
Minorities may not have the votes to change laws. Independent judges can rule against popular governments when laws violate the Constitution, without fear of losing their jobs.
4A teen is unhappy that the bus route to their school was cut. List three rights-based actions they could take, in a sensible order.
Sample: (1) gather information and write to their councillor (expression); (2) start a petition and get classmates to sign (democratic participation, expression); (3) speak at a council or transit board meeting, possibly with a peaceful rally (assembly). Courts would not normally be the first step for a service decision like this.
5How do civics skills transfer to a part-time job?
Sample: communicating respectfully with customers who disagree, checking information before acting, understanding workplace rules and rights (such as the Employment Standards Act), and working in a team to solve problems.
Challenge
1Some people argue Canada should make voting compulsory, as Australia does. Analyse the argument using rights and responsibilities.
For: voting is a responsibility; compulsory voting raises turnout so governments reflect everyone, not only those most likely to vote. Against: freedom includes the freedom not to participate; forcing people may produce uninformed votes; fines could fall hardest on people with low incomes. A balanced answer weighs the responsibility to vote against individual freedom.
2Compare how courts and elected legislatures each protect rights. Which is better at what?
Courts: good at protecting individuals and minorities against majority decisions, applying principles consistently, and deciding specific disputes with evidence. Legislatures: good at broad policy choices, funding programs that make rights real (such as interpreters or schools), and reflecting public values, with democratic accountability. They work best together: courts set limits; legislatures design solutions.
3Choose an issue you care about. Write a plan that uses at least three rights or institutions from this lesson, explains why each fits, and predicts one obstacle.
Look for: a clear issue; three well-matched tools (for example, a petition and council deputation for a municipal decision, a human rights complaint for private discrimination, an Ombudsman complaint for unfair provincial treatment, or a Charter challenge for a law); reasons for each; and a realistic obstacle (time, cost, opposing groups, needing legal help).
Check your understandingQuiz
1. Which is a legal duty of Canadian citizens?
2. In SOS Montfort, Franco-Ontarians used rallies, petitions and a court case to:
3. The Eldridge (1997) case was decided under which Charter section?
4. Which court hears appeals from Ontario's trial courts?
5. Who investigates complaints about unfair treatment by Ontario government organizations?
6. Which skill from political inquiry transfers most directly to a career as a journalist?
For parents and teachersBig idea: B3.2 (responsibilities), B3.3 (using rights to bring positive change), B3.4 (courts and other institutions) and A2 (transferable skills and careers). The real cases here (SOS Montfort, Eldridge, the First Nations child welfare case) show that ordinary people and groups can change policy through rights.
How to help: Share your own experience with jury duty, voting, volunteering, or dealing with a government office or tribunal. If your teen has a job, discuss their rights under the Employment Standards Act and who to contact with problems.
Common difficulties:
- Thinking every problem goes to court. Most change comes through political action first.
- Confusing the Charter (government) with human rights codes (private parties too).
- Seeing responsibilities only as rules. Discuss why they matter to others.