B. Civic Awareness · Civic Awareness: Democratic Values, Governance and RightsIndigenous Governance, Treaties and Crown-Indigenous Relations
B2.2 B2.3About 75 minutes
Learning goals- I can describe Indigenous governing systems that predate or exist alongside the Indian Act, and those created by it.
- I can explain how First Nations, Métis and Inuit governments interact with federal, provincial, territorial and municipal governments.
- I can explain what treaties are and how the treaty relationship and Crown-Indigenous relations work today.
- I can explain how treaties and Indigenous claims to sovereignty affect a region of Ontario.
Words to know
sovereignty
The authority of a people or nation to govern itself.
inherent right of self-government
The right of Indigenous peoples to govern themselves, which comes from their existence as nations before Canada, not from a grant by Canada.
Indian Act
A federal law first passed in 1876 that governs many aspects of the lives of First Nations people with status and of reserve lands. It has been amended many times and is still in force.
band council
A governing body of a First Nation under the Indian Act, made up of a chief and councillors.
treaty
A formal agreement between nations. In Canada, treaties between the Crown and Indigenous nations set out rights, responsibilities and relationships.
annuity
A payment made every year. Many treaties promised annual payments to treaty members.
honour of the Crown
The legal principle that the Crown must act honourably and keep its promises in its dealings with Indigenous peoples.
duty to consult
The Crown's legal duty to consult, and where appropriate accommodate, Indigenous peoples when a decision might affect their rights.
Governments older than Canada
Long before 1867, the land now called Canada was home to many self-governing nations with their own laws, leaders, diplomacy and treaties with each other. Those nations are still here. Today there are more than 630 First Nations across Canada (more than 130 in Ontario), as well as Métis and Inuit governments and organizations.
Understanding governance in Canada means understanding three kinds of relationships: Indigenous governments with their own citizens, Indigenous nations with the Crown (through treaties and the Constitution), and Indigenous governments with federal, provincial, territorial and municipal governments.
Remember from earlier grades
In Grade 5 you learned what band councils do, what self-government means, and about the duty to consult. In Grades 7 and 8 you studied the Robinson Treaties of 1850, the Numbered Treaties and the Indian Act. This lesson connects those pieces to how governance works today.
Governing systems that predate or exist alongside the Indian Act
Indigenous governance is diverse. Some examples:
- Haudenosaunee Confederacy: the Great Law of Peace unites the Mohawk, Oneida, Onondaga, Cayuga, Seneca and Tuscarora nations. In the traditional system, clan mothers select chiefs and can remove them, and the Confederacy Council makes decisions by consensus. The Confederacy has issued its own passports, as an expression of its sovereignty.
- Anishinaabe nations (including Ojibwe, Odawa, Potawatomi and Algonquin peoples) have traditionally organized responsibilities through clan (doodem) systems, with decisions made in council.
- Inuit communities traditionally made decisions through respected elders and community consensus. Today Inuit are represented nationally by Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, and in Nunavut, created in 1999 after the Nunavut land claims agreement, Inuit are the majority in a public government that all residents vote for.
- Métis governance has roots in self-governing communities, such as the buffalo hunt councils and the provisional government at Red River (1869 to 1870). Today the Métis Nation of Ontario is a Métis government with elected leadership and has signed agreements with Canada recognizing the Métis right to self-government.
These systems are not just history. Many operate today, sometimes alongside an Indian Act council in the same community.
Governing systems created by the Indian Act
The Indian Act (1876) gave the federal government wide control over First Nations people with status and over reserve lands. Among other things, it:
- defined who the government recognized as an "Indian" (status);
- imposed elected band councils (a chief and councillors), replacing traditional governments in many communities. At Six Nations of the Grand River, for example, Canada replaced the Confederacy Council with an elected band council in 1924. The Confederacy Council continued to meet and still does;
- for decades banned ceremonies such as the potlatch (from 1884 until 1951) and, through amendments, made attendance at residential schools compulsory.
The Indian Act is still in force, though it has been changed many times. Today a First Nation may choose its council in different ways: under Indian Act election rules (two-year terms), under its own custom election code, or under the First Nations Elections Act (2014), which allows four-year terms. Band councils run services such as on-reserve housing, schools, water systems and economic development, often with federal funding.
Self-government agreements and modern treaties
Since the 1970s, many nations have negotiated modern treaties (also called comprehensive land claims agreements, starting with the James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement of 1975) and self-government agreements that replace parts of the Indian Act with the nation's own laws. The Nisga'a Final Agreement in British Columbia (in effect since 2000) is a well-known example. In Ontario, a group of Anishinabek First Nations signed an agreement with Canada, put into law by Parliament in 2017, giving them control of their own education systems.
Three kinds of First Nations governance in Canada today. A single nation may have a traditional council and a band council, or may be moving from the Indian Act to self-government.Treaties and the treaty relationship
A treaty is an agreement between nations. Treaties between Indigenous nations and the Crown include:
- Peace and Friendship Treaties (1700s, in the Maritimes and Québec), about peace and trade, not land.
- Upper Canada land surrenders and the Robinson Treaties (1850) in what is now Ontario.
- The Numbered Treaties (1871 to 1921), including Treaty 3 (1873) and Treaty 9 (1905 to 1906, with later adhesions) in northern Ontario.
- Modern treaties since 1975.
Many First Nations understand treaties as agreements to share the land and live as partners, based on oral agreements and wampum. One example is the Two Row Wampum (Kaswentha), which the Haudenosaunee understand as an agreement made with Dutch traders in the early 1600s: two parallel rows, two vessels travelling side by side, neither steering the other. The written English texts of many treaties instead describe Indigenous nations surrendering land. This difference in understanding is at the heart of many disputes today.
Section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982 recognizes and affirms the existing Aboriginal and treaty rights of the Indian (First Nations), Inuit and Métis peoples. Courts have ruled that the Crown must act according to the honour of the Crown and has a duty to consult (and sometimes accommodate) Indigenous peoples before decisions that may affect their rights (for example, Haida Nation, 2004).
Crown-Indigenous relations today
- Two federal departments lead: Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada (treaties, self-government, claims) and Indigenous Services Canada (services such as on-reserve health and water). Ontario also has a ministry responsible for Indigenous affairs.
- In 2015 the Truth and Reconciliation Commission issued 94 Calls to Action.
- In 2021 Parliament passed the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, committing Canada to align its laws with the UN Declaration.
- In 2019 Parliament passed a law recognizing Indigenous jurisdiction over child and family services; the Supreme Court of Canada upheld it in 2024.
Claims to sovereignty. Some nations hold that they never gave up their sovereignty. Wiikwemkoong Unceded Territory on Manitoulin Island did not sign the 1862 Manitoulin Island treaty and identifies itself as unceded. The Algonquins of Ontario are negotiating a land claim covering a large area of eastern Ontario, including Ottawa, that was never covered by a land-surrender treaty.
A First Nation government works with several other governments at once. The arrows go both ways: these are relationships, not chains of command.Worked exampleModelled example: A region of Ontario: the Robinson-Huron Treaty territory
Explain how a treaty affects a region of Ontario today, using the Robinson-Huron Treaty (north shore of Lake Huron).
- The promise: in 1850, Anishinaabe leaders and the Crown signed the Robinson-Huron Treaty. The Crown promised annual payments (annuities) that would increase if the land produced enough revenue for the Crown to pay more without loss.
- What happened: the annuity was raised to $4 per person in 1875 and never raised again, even as mining and forestry in the region produced great wealth.
- Civic action: the Robinson-Huron First Nations took the Crown to court. In 2018 an Ontario court ruled that the Crown had to increase the annuities.
- Results: in 2023, Canada and Ontario reached a $10 billion settlement with the 21 Robinson-Huron Treaty First Nations for past compensation. In 2024 the Supreme Court of Canada ruled unanimously that the Crown had breached both Robinson Treaties and its honour, and directed the Crown to address compensation for the Robinson-Superior First Nations.
- Effects on the region: treaty rights shape how resource development, hunting and fishing, and land use happen there; the duty to consult applies to new mines and roads; and the settlement money supports community priorities chosen by each First Nation.
A treaty signed in 1850 still shapes the region: it sets legal obligations for the Crown, gives the First Nations rights that courts enforce, and requires consultation on development. The case shows treaties are living agreements, not history.
The Robinson-Huron annuity story. A promise to increase payments was not kept for about 150 years, until court action and a settlement.Worked exampleModelled example: Different perspectives on development in a northern region
In the Ring of Fire, a mineral-rich area in the Treaty 9 region of far northern Ontario, the province wants roads and mines. How do the governments involved see it?
- Some First Nations in the area support roads and development as partners, seeing jobs, year-round road access and revenue for their communities.
- Other First Nations oppose or want to slow development, citing risks to land, water and ways of life, or insist that nothing proceed without their consent.
- The provincial government controls natural resources and wants economic development, but must meet its duty to consult.
- The federal government has responsibilities for treaties and environmental assessments of major projects.
- Key point: First Nations are not one bloc. Each nation is its own government with its own perspective.
Treaties, the duty to consult and each nation's own decisions shape what happens in the region. A fair analysis recognizes several First Nations perspectives, not one.
Hands-on activityWhose treaty land am I on?
You need: a device with internet access, paper and a pencil.
- Search for the Government of Ontario's map of treaties in Ontario. Find the treaty (or treaties) that cover your home. If you live in an area with no land-surrender treaty, note that too.
- Write: the treaty name, the year, and the Indigenous nations involved.
- Find the nearest First Nation (or Métis council, or Inuit organization in your city). Visit its official website. Find how it governs: does it have a chief and council? A custom code? A traditional council? Self-government agreements?
- Find one current issue the community is working on (for example, water, education, housing, a land claim or a business partnership).
- Write a paragraph: how do treaties or Crown-Indigenous relations affect your region today?
What to look for: a correctly named treaty, governance described in the community's own words, and a current issue described accurately and respectfully, in the present tense.
Your turn
1Describe one Indigenous governing system that predates the Indian Act.
Sample: the Haudenosaunee Confederacy under the Great Law of Peace: clan mothers select and can remove chiefs, and the council decides by consensus. (Anishinaabe clan systems or Inuit consensus decision-making are also correct.)
2What kind of government did the Indian Act impose on First Nations?
Elected band councils (a chief and councillors), under federal rules, often replacing traditional governments.
3Name three ways a First Nation may choose its chief and council today.
Under Indian Act election rules (two-year terms), under its own custom election code, or under the First Nations Elections Act (four-year terms).
4What does section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982 do?
It recognizes and affirms the existing Aboriginal and treaty rights of First Nations, Inuit and Métis peoples.
5What is the Two Row Wampum, and what does it show about how many First Nations understand treaties?
A Haudenosaunee wampum belt with two parallel rows, representing two peoples travelling side by side without steering each other. It shows treaties understood as partnerships and sharing, not surrender.
6Name the two federal departments that lead Crown-Indigenous relations and services.
Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada, and Indigenous Services Canada.
7What did the Supreme Court of Canada decide about the Robinson Treaties in 2024?
That the Crown breached the treaties (and its honour) by failing to increase the annuities for about 150 years.
More practice: warm-up
1In what year was the Indian Act first passed?
2In what year was Nunavut created?
3What amount has the Robinson Treaty annuity been since 1875?
4What is the duty to consult?
The Crown's legal duty to consult, and where appropriate accommodate, Indigenous peoples before decisions that may affect their rights.
5How many Calls to Action did the Truth and Reconciliation Commission issue?
More practice: on your own
1Explain why written treaty texts and First Nations' understandings of the same treaty can differ.
Treaties were negotiated across languages and legal traditions. First Nations relied on oral agreements, ceremony and wampum describing sharing and partnership, while the Crown wrote English texts describing surrender. Each side's record reflects its own understanding.
2How does a self-government agreement differ from an Indian Act band council?
A band council's powers come from a federal law (the Indian Act) that Canada controls. A self-government agreement is negotiated: it recognizes the nation's own law-making powers in areas set out in the agreement, replacing parts of the Indian Act.
3Give an example of a First Nation government interacting with a municipal government.
Sample: a service agreement in which a neighbouring town provides fire protection or water to the reserve, or the two governments plan roads or land use together.
4Why is the Robinson-Huron case an example of objectives and results?
The treaty's objective included annuities that would rise with the region's wealth. The result for 150 years was no increase. Court action changed the result through a ruling and a $10 billion settlement.
5What does it mean for Wiikwemkoong to describe itself as "unceded"?
Its people did not sign the 1862 Manitoulin Island treaty, so they did not give up their land through that treaty, and the community asserts its continuing sovereignty over it.
Challenge
1Evaluate this claim: "The Indian Act is just an old law and doesn't affect governance today."
Inaccurate. The Indian Act is still in force. It still defines status, governs reserve lands and sets rules for many band council elections and powers. Many First Nations are working to replace parts of it through self-government agreements, custom codes and the First Nations Elections Act. Its long-term effects, such as replacing traditional governments, are also still felt.
2Explain how the duty to consult connects the Constitution, the courts and a provincial decision about a new mine.
Section 35 of the Constitution protects Aboriginal and treaty rights. Courts (for example, in Haida Nation, 2004) ruled that the Crown must consult, and sometimes accommodate, Indigenous peoples before decisions that may affect those rights. So before Ontario approves a mine that could affect treaty rights, it must consult the affected First Nations; if it does not, a court can overturn or pause the decision.
3Using the concept of political perspective, explain why there is no single "Indigenous position" on resource development in the Ring of Fire.
Each First Nation is a separate government with its own priorities, location and history. Some see roads and mines as a path to jobs and revenue as partners; others prioritize protecting land, water and ways of life, or demand consent before any project. Perspectives also differ within communities. Treating them as one group would erase real democratic debate.
Check your understandingQuiz
1. In the traditional Haudenosaunee system, who selects chiefs?
2. Which federal law, first passed in 1876, imposed band councils on many First Nations?
3. Section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982:
4. The Two Row Wampum represents:
5. In 2024, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that in the Robinson Treaties the Crown had:
6. The duty to consult belongs to:
For parents and teachersBig idea: Expectation B2.3 asks students to describe Indigenous governing systems both created by the Indian Act and those that predate or exist alongside it, how they interact with other governments, and how treaties, Crown-Indigenous relations or claims to sovereignty affect a region of their choice. This lesson uses the Robinson-Huron Treaty region as its case study.
Sensitivity: The Indian Act and residential schools caused deep harm, and some families live with those effects today. Speak about First Nations, Métis and Inuit peoples in the present tense as living nations with their own governments. There is no "just for fun" box in this lesson out of respect for the subject.
How to help: Do the treaty-map activity together. If you are an Indigenous family, your own knowledge of your nation's governance is a valuable source. If not, use the official websites of nearby First Nations or Métis organizations as sources.
Common difficulties:
- Treating Indigenous peoples as one group. Encourage naming specific nations.
- Thinking treaties are only history. Point to the 2023 settlement and 2024 Supreme Court ruling.
- Confusing the duty to consult with a veto. The duty is to consult and, where appropriate, accommodate; how far it goes is still debated in courts.