Grade by Grade
E. Earth and Space Science: Space Exploration · Space Exploration: The Sun, the Solar System and the Universe

Is It Worth It? Evaluating the Impacts of Space Exploration

E1.1 A1.1 A2.3 A2.4About 75 minutes
Learning goals
  • I can describe social, environmental and economic impacts of space observation and exploration, both positive and negative.
  • I can explain the problem of space debris and the Kessler syndrome.
  • I can consider different perspectives, including Indigenous perspectives, on how space and the sky are used.
  • I can use research and a decision-making tool to evaluate a space project and defend a position with evidence.

Words to know

impact
An effect, positive or negative, that something has on people, the environment or the economy.
stakeholder
A person or group affected by a decision or with an interest in it.
space debris
Human-made objects in orbit that no longer serve a purpose, such as old satellites, rocket stages and fragments.
Kessler syndrome
A possible chain reaction in which collisions between objects in orbit create debris that causes more collisions.
light pollution
Excess or badly aimed artificial light that brightens the night sky and hides the stars.
Outer Space Treaty
A 1967 international treaty saying that space is free for exploration and use by all countries, and no nation can claim the Moon or other bodies.
cost-benefit analysis
Comparing all the expected costs and benefits of a choice to help decide whether it is worthwhile.

Remember from Grade 6

In Grade 6 you asked 'Is space exploration worth it?' and thought about space debris, light pollution and different perspectives. In Grade 9 you will evaluate impacts more carefully: sorting them into social, environmental and economic, using evidence, and making a decision you can defend.

A question to start

The James Webb Space Telescope, launched in December 2021, cost about US$10 billion. Canada built two of its parts: the Fine Guidance Sensor, which keeps it pointed precisely, and the NIRISS science instrument, and in return Canadian astronomers get a share of its observing time. Webb has photographed some of the most distant galaxies ever seen. Was it worth the money? Your answer depends on what you value and what evidence you consider. Today you'll learn to make that kind of judgment like a scientist and a citizen.

Social impacts

Positive:

  • Inspiration and education. Missions inspire students to study science, technology, engineering and math. Canadians in space include Marc Garneau (first Canadian in space, 1984), Roberta Bondar (first Canadian woman in space, 1992), Chris Hadfield (first Canadian to walk in space, 2001, and first Canadian commander of the ISS, 2013), Julie Payette and David Saint-Jacques. Jeremy Hansen flew on NASA's Artemis II mission around the Moon in April 2026, becoming the first Canadian to travel to the Moon.
  • Cooperation. The International Space Station is run by the space agencies of the United States, Russia, Europe, Japan and Canada, working together.
  • Everyday services. Weather forecasts, GPS navigation, banking, and TV and internet in remote areas all depend on satellites.

Negative or debated:

  • Who benefits and who decides? Most space activity is run by a few wealthy countries and companies.
  • Dark skies. Large groups of bright satellites leave streaks in telescope images and add to the light that hides the stars, affecting astronomy and people who learn from the night sky, including many First Nations, Métis and Inuit communities who share star knowledge.
  • Sacred places. Some observatories are built on mountains that are sacred to Indigenous peoples. For example, many Native Hawaiians have opposed building a new giant telescope on Maunakea in Hawai'i, a sacred mountain, which led to protests and an ongoing discussion about how astronomy should respect Indigenous rights.

Environmental impacts

Positive: satellites give us crucial data on climate change, wildfires, floods, sea ice and pollution (Lesson 14).

Negative:

  • Space debris. The European Space Agency estimates there are more than a million pieces of debris larger than 1 cm in orbit. In low Earth orbit they travel at about 7 to 8 km/s, so even a small piece can damage a satellite or the ISS. Larger pieces are tracked, and the ISS has moved out of the way of debris many times.
  • Rocket exhaust. Launches release gases and particles (such as soot) high in the atmosphere, where they stay longer than at ground level. Scientists are studying how much this matters as launches increase.
  • Re-entry. Old satellites burning up add metal particles to the upper atmosphere; research on the effects is ongoing.
  • Launch sites can affect nearby wildlife habitats.

Economic impacts

Positive: jobs for engineers, scientists and skilled trades; Canadian companies that build robotics, satellites and instruments; spinoff products (Lesson 15); reusable rockets have helped lower launch costs; satellite internet can connect remote and northern communities.

Negative: missions are expensive and can fail; money spent on space is not spent on other needs (this is called an opportunity cost).

Social+ inspires STEM careers+ international cooperation (ISS)+ GPS, weather, communication− who benefits? who decides?− light pollution affects dark skiesEnvironmental+ satellites monitor climate+ data to protect forests, oceans− space debris− rocket exhaust in the upper air− launch-site impactsEconomic+ jobs in Canada's space sector+ spinoffs and new industries+ satellite internet for remote areas− very high costs and risk− money not spent elsewhere
Examples of positive (+) and negative (−) impacts of space exploration in three categories. A good evaluation weighs both sides in every category.

Space debris and the Kessler syndrome

In 1978, NASA scientist Donald Kessler warned that if there were enough objects in an orbit, one collision could create fragments that cause more collisions, and so on, in a chain reaction. Some orbits could become too dangerous to use for a very long time. This idea is called the Kessler syndrome.

Ways to reduce the risk:

  • design satellites to de-orbit (fall back and burn up) within a few years after their mission ends;
  • track debris and move satellites out of the way;
  • avoid tests that blow up satellites;
  • develop missions to capture and remove large debris.

The Outer Space Treaty (1967) says space should be used for the benefit of all countries, but it was written long before thousands of satellites were launched. Countries are still working out rules for traffic, debris and resources in space.

satellite1. collisionwith debris2. thousands offast fragments3. fragments hitmore satellites4. more collisions,more debris5. an orbit so crowdedit becomes risky to useThe chain reaction scientists call the Kessler syndrome (not to scale)
One collision can make thousands of fragments, which can hit other satellites and make even more debris.
Worked example

Example 1: Sorting impacts

Classify each impact as social, environmental or economic, and positive or negative: (a) satellite internet reaches a fly-in community in northern Ontario; (b) a broken satellite breaks into 1000 pieces; (c) a Canadian robotics company hires 200 workers.

  1. (a) Better access to online school, telemedicine and jobs → social, positive (also economic, positive).
  2. (b) New debris that threatens other satellites → environmental, negative.
  3. (c) New jobs and income → economic, positive.

(a) social (+); (b) environmental (−); (c) economic (+). Some impacts fit in more than one category, which is fine if you explain why.

Worked example

Example 2: A cost-benefit analysis

Should Canada help pay for a new Earth-observation satellite to monitor wildfires? Use a structured analysis.

  1. Stakeholders: communities near forests, firefighters, people affected by smoke, taxpayers, forestry companies, First Nations whose lands and communities are affected by fires.
  2. Benefits: earlier fire detection, better evacuation decisions, health warnings about smoke, data on climate change, Canadian jobs.
  3. Costs: hundreds of millions of dollars; risk of launch failure; adds one more object to orbit (must be designed to de-orbit).
  4. Evidence: Canada's fire seasons have been severe (the 2023 season set records); satellites already help detect fires and map smoke.
  5. Decision: weigh the costs against the benefits and the evidence.

A defensible conclusion: Yes, because the benefits to safety and health are large and growing, if the satellite is designed to de-orbit safely and its data is shared openly, including with First Nations communities and emergency services. (A 'no' position can also be defended with evidence.)

Hands-on activity

Research and decide: a space-project town hall

You need: a computer or library access, paper, and family members to role-play.

Question: Choose one: (a) Should Canada spend more on space exploration? (b) Should there be limits on how many satellites companies can launch? (c) Should mining asteroids or the Moon be allowed?

  1. Research (A1.1): find at least three reliable sources (for example, the Canadian Space Agency, NASA, the European Space Agency, a university, or a respected news outlet). Record the author, date and website.
  2. Stakeholders: list at least four groups affected (for example, astronomers, a remote community, an Indigenous knowledge keeper, a satellite company, taxpayers, environmental groups).
  3. Organize: make a three-column table: social, environmental, economic. Put positive and negative impacts with evidence in each.
  4. Role-play: each family member speaks for one stakeholder for one minute.
  5. Decide: write a one-paragraph position statement that uses at least two pieces of evidence and responds to one opposing view.

What to look for: a strong statement gives a clear position, uses specific evidence with sources, considers more than one category of impact, and fairly answers a different perspective rather than ignoring it.

Just for fun

Space debris includes some surprising items. During spacewalks, astronauts have accidentally let go of a spatula (in 2006) and a whole tool bag (in 2008), which orbited Earth for months before burning up. Imagine losing your homework at 28 000 km/h.

Your turn

1

Give one positive and one negative social impact of space exploration.

2

Give one positive and one negative environmental impact.

3

Give one positive and one negative economic impact.

4

What is the Kessler syndrome?

5

Why is even a tiny piece of debris dangerous?

6

Name three Canadian astronauts and one achievement of each.

7

What is a stakeholder? Give two examples for a new satellite constellation.

More practice: warm-up

1

Which five space agencies run the ISS?

2

In what year did Chris Hadfield become commander of the ISS?

3

What does the Outer Space Treaty (1967) say about the Moon?

4

What is opportunity cost?

5

About how much did the James Webb Space Telescope cost?

More practice: on your own

1

Suggest two ways to reduce space debris.

2

Why might an Inuit or First Nations knowledge keeper be concerned about thousands of new bright satellites?

3

How can satellite internet be a positive social and economic impact for northern communities?

4

Why should a cost-benefit analysis consider more than money?

5

Explain why the Maunakea telescope debate is about more than science.

Challenge

1

A piece of debris with a mass of 0.01 kg moves at 7500 m/s. Its kinetic energy is ½mv². Calculate it, and compare it with a 1500 kg car at 25 m/s (about 90 km/h).

2

Write a position statement (3 to 4 sentences) on whether companies should be allowed to launch unlimited satellites. Use evidence and respond to one opposing view.

3

How does the history of space exploration show that science is shaped by economic, social and political context?

Check your understanding

Quiz

1.

Which is an environmental impact of space exploration?

2.

The Kessler syndrome describes:

3.

Who was the first Canadian in space?

4.

Which of these is an example of opportunity cost?

5.

Why do some astronomers and Indigenous communities worry about large satellite constellations?

6.

A strong evaluation of a space project should:

For parents and teachers

Big idea: E1.1 asks students to evaluate social, environmental and economic impacts of space observation and exploration. Grade 9 goes beyond listing impacts: students sort them, use evidence, consider stakeholders (including Indigenous perspectives), and defend a decision. This supports research skills (A1.1), understanding that science is shaped by its context (A2.3), and scientific literacy on issues that affect us all (A2.4).

Common difficulties:

  • One-sided answers. Ask 'Who might disagree, and why?'
  • Opinions without evidence. Ask 'How do you know? What is your source?'
  • Treating Indigenous perspectives as an add-on. Help your teen see them as stakeholders with rights and knowledge.

How to help: run the town-hall role-play at dinner. Take a stakeholder role yourself and ask your teen to answer your concerns respectfully with evidence.