Grade by Grade
C. Managing Canada's Resources and Industries · Managing Canada's Resources and Industries

Powering Canada: Fossil Fuels and Clean Energy

C1.3 C1.1About 75 minutes
Learning goals
  • I can describe Canada's main energy resources and where they are produced.
  • I can explain how location affects which methods of clean energy production (hydro, nuclear, wind and solar) are used.
  • I can compare the advantages and disadvantages of different energy sources.
  • I can read and interpret a graph of an electricity supply mix.

Words to know

electricity supply mix
The share of electricity that comes from each source, such as nuclear, hydro, gas, wind and solar.
clean energy
Energy produced with little or no greenhouse gas emissions or air pollution, such as hydro, nuclear, wind and solar.
baseload
The minimum amount of electricity needed all the time, usually supplied by steady sources like nuclear and large hydro.
intermittent
Starting and stopping, or rising and falling. Wind and solar power are intermittent.
energy storage
Ways to save energy for later, such as batteries or pumping water uphill into a reservoir.
greenhouse gas
A gas, such as carbon dioxide or methane, that traps heat in the atmosphere and contributes to climate change.
small modular reactor (SMR)
A nuclear reactor that is smaller than traditional reactors, designed to be built in factory-made sections.
transmission line
A high-voltage power line that carries electricity long distances.

Hook: flip the switch

When you turn on a light in Ontario, where does the electricity come from? For most Ontarians the honest answer is: a little bit of everything, but mostly uranium and falling water. In British Columbia or Quebec, it is mostly falling water. In Alberta, it is mostly natural gas. Each province's mix tells a story about its physical geography.

Fossil fuels

Canada is a major producer of oil and natural gas. Natural Resources Canada reports that Canada has the third-largest proven oil reserves in the world, and almost all of it is in Alberta's oil sands. Natural gas comes mostly from Alberta and northeastern British Columbia.

Fossil fuels are energy-dense and easy to store and transport, which is why they power most vehicles, heat many homes and run industries. But burning them releases greenhouse gases and air pollutants. Ontario stopped burning coal for electricity in 2014, when its last coal-fired generating station stopped using coal. Today, Ontario uses natural gas plants mainly to meet peaks in demand and to back up other sources.

Clean energy: location decides the method

Hydroelectricity needs a large river and a drop in height. Water stored behind a dam (or flowing through a run-of-river station) spins turbines. Provinces with big rivers flowing off mountains or the Canadian Shield (British Columbia, Manitoba, Quebec, Newfoundland and Labrador) rely heavily on hydro. Ontario's waterpower includes stations at Niagara Falls. Large dams can flood land, change fish habitat, and release mercury from flooded soils into the food chain, which has affected First Nations and Inuit who rely on fish. The James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement (1975), signed with the Cree and Inuit of northern Quebec after a large hydro project began, was Canada's first modern land claim agreement.

Nuclear power splits uranium atoms to make heat, which makes steam to spin turbines. Canada's uranium is mined in the Athabasca Basin of northern Saskatchewan, and Canada designed its own reactor type, the CANDU. Ontario has three nuclear generating stations: Bruce (on Lake Huron), Darlington and Pickering (on Lake Ontario). They are beside large lakes because they need lots of cooling water. Nuclear power produces no greenhouse gases while operating and runs steadily (baseload), but used fuel stays radioactive for a very long time. In 2024 the Nuclear Waste Management Organization chose an area in northwestern Ontario, the Wabigoon Lake Ojibway Nation-Ignace area, as the site for a deep underground repository, with both communities having agreed to host it. Ontario Power Generation is also building small modular reactors at the Darlington site.

Wind power needs strong, steady wind: open Prairie land, shorelines such as those of Lake Huron and Lake Erie, and places like the Gaspé Peninsula in Quebec. It is a flow resource with no fuel cost, but it is intermittent, needs large areas (though farming can continue between turbines), and turbines must be sited to reduce harm to birds and bats.

Solar power works best where there are many sunny days. Southern Alberta and Saskatchewan are among the sunniest places in Canada. Solar panels can go on rooftops, so they can be close to users. Output drops at night and in winter, which is why energy storage (batteries) is becoming important.

Ontario's electricity supply mix, 2024Nuclear48.5%Waterpower (hydro)23.4%Natural gas, oil, other16.6%Wind9.0%Solar2.2%Bioenergy0.4%Source: Ontario Energy Board, 2024 supply mix data (may not add to 100% due to rounding)
Ontario's 2024 mix. Nuclear and waterpower together supplied more than 70%. The green bars are wind, solar and bioenergy; the yellow bar is fossil-fuel and other generation.
How a hydroelectric dam works (simplified)reservoir (high water)damintaketurbinegeneratorpower lines to homesriver continues downstream (lower)
Hydro turns the height difference of water into electricity. The water is not used up (a flow resource), but the reservoir floods land upstream and the dam changes the river.
SourceWhere in Canada (examples)AdvantagesDisadvantages
HydroBC, Manitoba, Quebec, Labrador, Niagara (ON)No fuel; steady; long life; can store waterFloods land; changes rivers and fish habitat; mercury; few sites left near cities
NuclearBruce, Darlington, Pickering (ON); Point Lepreau (NB)No greenhouse gases while running; steady baseloadLong-lived radioactive used fuel; very high building cost; long construction
WindPrairies, Lake Huron and Lake Erie shores, GaspéNo fuel; flow resource; farmland can still be usedIntermittent; needs backup or storage; risk to birds and bats; some local opposition
SolarSouthern Alberta and Saskatchewan; rooftops anywhereNo fuel; can be on buildings; quietNo output at night; lower in winter; needs storage
Natural gasPlants in AB, ON and other provincesQuickly turned up or down; reliableGreenhouse gases; non-renewable
Comparing electricity sources. No source is perfect: grids combine several.

Innovative approaches

  • Indigenous-led energy: Wataynikaneyap Power is a transmission project in northwestern Ontario that is 51% owned, equally, by 24 First Nations, with Fortis Inc. and other private investors owning the rest. It connects remote First Nations communities to the provincial grid so they can stop relying on diesel generators, which the partnership describes as costly, environmentally risky and unreliable. Many First Nations, Métis and Inuit communities also own or co-own wind, solar and hydro projects.
  • Storage: large batteries store wind and solar power for when it is needed.
  • Small modular reactors may one day power remote mines and communities.
  • Carbon capture and storage: some facilities in Alberta capture carbon dioxide and store it deep underground instead of releasing it.
Worked example

Modelled example: power for a remote community

A remote fly-in First Nation community in northern Ontario uses diesel generators. Diesel is flown in or trucked on a winter road. Compare three options: (1) keep diesel, (2) connect to the grid with a transmission line, (3) build solar panels plus batteries, with diesel backup.

  1. Option 1, diesel: reliable short-term, but fuel is expensive to transport, spills are a risk, emissions and noise are high, and limited capacity can stop new homes and buildings from being connected.
  2. Option 2, transmission line: connects to Ontario's mostly low-carbon grid, gives much more capacity, but costs a lot to build across hundreds of kilometres of Shield and muskeg. Shared ownership (as with Wataynikaneyap) can give the community a long-term income.
  3. Option 3, solar plus batteries: cuts diesel use and creates local jobs, but long, dark winters reduce output, so some backup is still needed.
  4. Decision criteria: cost over 20+ years, reliability, environmental impact, and community control: what the community itself decides.

There is no single right answer. A transmission line may be best where it can be built; solar plus storage may be a strong option where it cannot. The community's own priorities must lead the decision.

Hands-on activity

How much electricity does it take?

You need: 3 or 4 appliances with a label showing watts (W) (often on the bottom or back: kettle, toaster, hair dryer, laptop charger), a calculator, and a grown-up's permission. Do not unplug or flip appliances that are hot or in use.

  1. Record the wattage of each appliance.
  2. Estimate how many minutes each is used per day.
  3. Calculate kilowatt-hours (kWh): watts × hours ÷ 1000. Example: a 1500 W kettle used 6 minutes (0.1 h) = 1500 × 0.1 ÷ 1000 = 0.15 kWh.
  4. Use the 2024 Ontario mix graph: about what share of each kWh would come from nuclear? (About half.)
  5. Suggest one way your household could shift use to times of lower demand (for example, running the dishwasher at night).
Just for fun

How did the solar panel do on its geography test?

It got a brilliant mark. Its only weakness was the night-time questions.

Your turn

1

Using the 2024 Ontario graph, what share of Ontario's electricity came from nuclear and waterpower combined?

2

Why are Ontario's nuclear stations located on the shores of Lake Ontario and Lake Huron?

3

Name two physical conditions needed for hydroelectricity.

4

Where in Canada are conditions best for solar power, and why?

5

Give one advantage and one disadvantage of wind power.

6

Why is used nuclear fuel a long-term challenge?

7

What was the James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement (1975), and why is it connected to energy?

More practice: warm-up

1

Is wind a renewable, non-renewable or flow resource?

2

What reactor design did Canada develop?

3

In what year did Ontario stop burning coal for electricity?

4

What does SMR stand for?

5

What share of Ontario's electricity came from wind in 2024 (OEB)?

More practice: on your own

1

Explain why British Columbia and Quebec rely more on hydro than Saskatchewan does.

2

What does 'baseload' mean, and which sources usually supply it?

3

Why does a grid with lots of wind and solar need storage or backup?

4

Describe one environmental and one social impact of large hydro dams.

5

Calculate the energy used by a 1200 W hair dryer used 10 minutes a day for 30 days.

Challenge

1

Ontario plans to need much more electricity as cars and heating become electric. Evaluate nuclear and wind as ways to meet this demand, using at least three criteria.

2

Why might a province with large natural gas reserves (Alberta) have a different electricity mix from one with big rivers (Manitoba)? Use the idea that location and accessibility shape use.

3

Explain how Indigenous ownership of an energy project can support both sustainability and economic reconciliation.

Check your understanding

Quiz

1.

According to the Ontario Energy Board, which source supplied the largest share of Ontario's electricity in 2024?

2.

Which source supplies the largest share of electricity in Canada as a whole?

3.

Why are wind and solar called intermittent?

4.

Where is most of Canada's uranium mined?

5.

What is the main environmental challenge that is special to nuclear power?

6.

Wataynikaneyap Power, a transmission line in northwestern Ontario, is majority-owned by 24 First Nations. What is its main purpose?

For parents and teachers

Graph reading is a key skill here: ask your teen to explain the Ontario 2024 mix graph to you and to add up shares. Some facts in this lesson (such as the 2024 selection of the Wabigoon Lake Ojibway Nation-Ignace area for a used-fuel repository, and small modular reactors at Darlington) describe ongoing projects, so news may have moved on; that is a good chance to check current sources together. Common difficulties: thinking nuclear power emits greenhouse gases while operating; thinking hydro is 'impact-free'; forgetting that location (rivers, sun, wind, cooling water) decides which method is used.