Grade by Grade
B. Life Systems · Cells

Cell Biology Breakthroughs: Weighing Benefits and Harms

B1.2 B1.1 A2.2 A3.3 A1.1 A1.5About 60 minutes
Learning goals
  • I can describe developments in cell biology such as insulin made by microbes, stem cell transplants, genetically modified crops, cultured meat and AI image analysis.
  • I can analyse the benefits and harms of a development for human health and the environment.
  • I can consider a development from different perspectives, including First Nations, Métis and Inuit perspectives on research.
  • I can research a development using reliable sources and present a reasoned conclusion.

Words to know

genetic modification
Changing an organism's DNA in a lab, for example by adding a gene from another organism, to give it a new trait.
stem cell transplant
A treatment that replaces a patient's damaged blood-forming cells with healthy stem cells, often from a donor's bone marrow or blood.
cultured meat
Meat grown from animal cells in a laboratory or factory, instead of from a raised and slaughtered animal.
artificial intelligence (AI)
Computer systems that learn patterns from large amounts of data to make predictions or decisions, such as spotting unusual cells in images.
perspective
The way a person or group sees an issue, shaped by their experiences, values and needs.
informed consent
Agreeing to take part in research (or treatment) after being clearly told what will happen, the risks, and how samples and data will be used.

Science that changes lives

Everything you've learned in this unit (organelles, cell division, stem cells, microbes) is used by scientists to make medicines, grow food and clean up pollution. Each new development brings benefits, but can also bring risks or raise hard questions. Different people often see the same development in very different ways. In this lesson you'll practise weighing them.

DevelopmentWhat it isPossible benefitsPossible harms or concerns
Insulin from microbesInsulin, which people with type 1 diabetes need, was first purified for treatment in Toronto in 1921–22 (Frederick Banting, Charles Best, James Collip and John Macleod). Today most insulin is made by genetically modified bacteria or yeast that carry the human insulin gene.Large amounts of insulin identical to human insulin; no longer depends on animal organs.Cost and access: some people around the world still can't afford it.
Stem cell transplantsBuilding on the stem cell discovery by James Till and Ernest McCulloch (Toronto, 1961), doctors replace a patient's damaged blood-forming cells with healthy stem cells.Can treat some blood cancers, such as leukemia, and other blood diseases.Finding a matching donor is hard; serious side effects are possible. Patients are more likely to match donors with similar ancestry, so donor registries (like Canadian Blood Services' Stem Cell Registry) need donors from all backgrounds.
Genetically modified (GM) cropsCrops with changed DNA. Examples: corn that makes its own protein that is toxic to certain insect pests; canola that tolerates a weed killer. Canola itself was first bred in Canada, and much of the canola grown in Canada today is GM.Less insecticide spraying for some crops; easier weed control; higher yields for farmers.Some insects and weeds have evolved resistance; worries about effects on other living things and on farms that don't grow GM crops; seed costs for farmers; some consumers want clear labels.
Cultured meatMeat grown from animal cells in large tanks of nutrients. A few countries have approved some products for sale.May need less land and water and fewer animals raised for food.Uses lots of energy; still expensive; long-term effects not fully known; could affect the jobs and incomes of farmers.
AI to analyse cell imagesComputer programs trained on thousands of microscope images to flag cells that may be cancer.Faster screening; may catch things a tired person misses; helps where there are few specialists.Can make mistakes, especially for groups not well represented in the training images; privacy of patients' images; doctors must still check.
Microbes that clean up pollutionBacteria that break down oil or other pollutants (bioremediation).Cleans soil and water with fewer harsh chemicals.Works slowly; must be monitored so added microbes don't harm the ecosystem.
Benefits and harms depend on how a technology is used, by whom, and who is affected.
A huge field of bright yellow canola flowers under a blue sky with white clouds.
Canola was first bred in Canada, and much of the canola grown here today is genetically modified. Farmers, scientists and consumers can see this development in different ways. AI-generated image
1. Copy the humaninsulin gene (DNA)2. Put the geneinto a bacterium3. Bacteria multiplyin big tanksinsulin4. Insulin is collectedand purifiedThe bacteria make insulin identical to human insulin.
How most insulin is made today (simplified). The human insulin gene is put into bacteria (or yeast); the microbes multiply and make insulin identical to human insulin, which is then collected and purified.

Different perspectives

When you analyse a development, ask who is affected and how they might see it:

  • A patient may care most about whether a treatment works and is safe.
  • A farmer may think about yields, costs and their family's livelihood.
  • An environmental scientist may focus on effects on ecosystems and biodiversity.
  • A consumer may want safe, affordable food and clear labels.
  • Some people have religious or ethical views about which kinds of research are acceptable.

First Nations, Métis and Inuit perspectives. Many Indigenous communities take part in health research today, and many lead it. Communities have also spoken up about research done without proper consent: in the past, some researchers used blood samples given by First Nations people for one study in other studies without permission. In response, First Nations created the OCAP® principles (Ownership, Control, Access and Possession), which say First Nations communities should own and control information and samples collected about them. Métis and Inuit organizations have their own research guidelines too. These approaches remind all scientists that research should respect the people it involves, and in Grade 7 you saw how Two-Eyed Seeing brings Indigenous and Western knowledges together.

Worked example

Let's analyse a development: GM insect-resistant corn

Analyse the benefits and harms of growing corn that makes its own insect-killing protein. Consider human health and the environment, and at least two perspectives.

  1. What it does: the corn plant's cells make a protein that kills certain caterpillar pests that eat it.
  2. Benefits: less insect damage, so higher yields; farmers may spray less insecticide, which can be better for farm workers and some other insects.
  3. Harms or concerns: some pests have become resistant over time; questions about effects on other insects; worries from organic farmers whose crops could be cross-pollinated by GM corn.
  4. Farmer's perspective: values higher yields and lower spraying costs, but must pay for seed and follow rules to slow resistance.
  5. Environmental perspective: less spraying is a plus; resistance and effects on biodiversity need monitoring.
  6. Reasoned conclusion: a balanced judgement, for example: useful when used with good practices (such as planting refuge areas of non-GM corn to slow resistance) and ongoing monitoring.

A strong analysis names benefits and harms for health and the environment, considers several perspectives, and ends with a conclusion supported by evidence, not just an opinion.

Benefitshigher yieldsless insecticidesprayedConcernsresistant pestseffects on otherinsects; organicfarms nearbyGM insect-resistant corn: weigh both sides
Analysing a development means putting benefits and concerns on the scale together. A reasoned conclusion explains which way the evidence tips, and under what conditions.
Worked example

Let's evaluate an AI tool

A hospital wants to use an AI program that reads images of blood cells to flag possible leukemia. The program was trained mostly on images from one country. What questions should the hospital ask?

  1. How accurate is it? How often does it miss a problem, and how often does it raise a false alarm?
  2. Was it trained on images like ours? If the training images came mostly from one group of patients or one kind of microscope, it may make more mistakes for others.
  3. Who checks it? A pathologist or lab technologist should confirm each result.
  4. Privacy: how are patients' images stored, and who can use them? Did patients consent?
  5. Benefit: faster results, and help for busy staff.

Use AI as a helper, test it on local patients, keep experts checking results, and protect privacy and consent.

Is my source reliable?

When researching, prefer government health and science agencies, universities, hospitals, science centres and science news written by experts. Check: Who wrote it? When? What evidence do they give? Are they selling something? Compare at least two sources. For controversial topics, look for sources that present more than one side.

Just for fun

Riddle: what has no author, no date, no evidence and a giant BUY NOW button?

Not a reliable source. (Ask "Are they selling something?" and you'll beat most of the internet.)

Hands-on activity

Research and decide: a cell-biology development

You need: a device with internet access (with an adult's permission) or library books, paper.

  1. Choose one development: stem cell transplants, insulin made by microbes, GM crops, cultured meat, AI for reading cell images, or bioremediation.
  2. Research it using at least two reliable sources. Record the title, author or organization, and date of each.
  3. Make a PMI chart: Plus (benefits), Minus (harms or risks), Interesting (questions or surprising facts). Include effects on human health and on the environment.
  4. Write how three different people or groups might see it (for example, a patient, a farmer and an environmental scientist, or a First Nations health researcher).
  5. Write your conclusion in one paragraph: Should this development be used more, used with limits, or not used? Why? Use evidence from your chart.
  6. Communicate: present your conclusion to someone at home in 2 minutes, or make a one-page infographic.

What to look for: two named, reliable sources; at least two benefits and two harms; three distinct perspectives; a conclusion that follows from the evidence and admits uncertainty where there is some.

Your turn

1

How is most insulin made today?

2

Which Canadian scientists first showed that blood-forming stem cells exist, and when?

3

Give one benefit and one concern about GM crops.

4

Give one environmental benefit and one concern about cultured meat.

5

Why does the Stem Cell Registry need donors from all backgrounds?

6

What do the letters in OCAP® stand for?

7

Give one risk of using AI to read cell images.

More practice: warm-up

1

In which city was insulin first purified for treatment?

2

What is cultured meat grown from?

3

What do bacteria do in bioremediation?

4

What is informed consent?

5

Name one reliable kind of source for health research.

More practice: on your own

1

Explain why using microbes to make insulin was an improvement over getting it from animal organs.

2

A farmer and an organic farmer live side by side. One grows GM canola. How might their perspectives differ?

3

Why might some First Nations communities want to control research samples and data about them?

4

Explain why an AI trained on images from one group of patients might make more mistakes for other groups.

5

Choose the development you think helps human health the most, and give two reasons.

Challenge

1

Cultured meat might reduce land use, but it uses a lot of energy. Explain how the source of that energy changes whether it is better for the environment.

2

Write a balanced recommendation, in 3 to 4 sentences, about whether a hospital should use an AI cell-image tool.

3

Developments in cell biology can be both beneficial and harmful. Use antibiotics as an example, linking to what you learned about microbes.

Check your understanding

Quiz

1.

Most insulin today is made by…

2.

James Till and Ernest McCulloch are known for discovering…

3.

Which is a concern about GM insect-resistant crops?

4.

OCAP® principles say that First Nations communities should…

5.

Which is the best use of an AI tool for reading cell images?

6.

Which is the most reliable source for a report on stem cell transplants?

For parents and teachers

Big idea: cell biology has led to life-saving and world-changing developments (insulin from microbes, stem cell transplants, GM crops, cultured meat, AI tools, bioremediation), each with benefits and possible harms. Thoughtful decisions consider evidence and the perspectives of everyone affected.

How to help at home:

  • Help your child choose reliable sources and record them.
  • Ask for both sides: Who benefits? Who might be harmed? What would a farmer, a patient or a scientist say?
  • Share your own family's views respectfully, and let your child disagree with reasons.

Sensitive topic note: topics like GM food and research ethics can be values-based. Encourage your child to separate evidence from opinion, and to respect perspectives that differ from their own. The lesson mentions past research done without consent in Indigenous communities; present First Nations, Métis and Inuit peoples as communities that lead and partner in research today.

Common difficulties:

  • Listing only benefits or only harms. Insist on both.
  • Writing an opinion with no evidence. Ask: What fact supports that?