D. Gravitational, Electric, and Magnetic Fields · Gravitational, Electric and Magnetic FieldsGravitational Potential Energy, Escape Speed and Black Holes
D2.1 D2.2About 75 minutes
Learning goals- I can explain why gravitational potential energy is Eg = −GMm/r, with zero at infinity.
- I can calculate the change in gravitational potential energy between two distances and show that mgh is a special case.
- I can find the kinetic, potential and total energy of a satellite and the energy needed to change orbits.
- I can derive and use escape speed, and use the Schwarzschild radius to describe a black hole.
Words to know
gravitational potential energy (Eg)
The energy of a system of two masses because of their separation: Eg = −GMm/r, taking Eg = 0 when they are infinitely far apart.
gravitational potential
Gravitational potential energy per kilogram at a point: −GM/r, in J/kg. Compare electric potential later in this unit.
bound system
A system whose total energy (Ek + Eg) is negative, so the objects cannot separate to infinity without energy being added.
binding energy
The energy that must be added to a bound system to just separate its parts to infinity; equal to the size of its (negative) total energy.
escape speed
The minimum launch speed for an object to escape a body's gravity and never return (ignoring air): v = √(2GM/r).
black hole
A region where matter is so compressed that the escape speed exceeds the speed of light, so not even light can get out.
event horizon / Schwarzschild radius
The boundary of a non-rotating black hole, at r_s = 2GM/c². Nothing inside it can escape.
Why is mgh not enough?
In SPH3U you used Eg = mgh for a ball on a shelf. That works because g barely changes over a few metres. But a rocket climbing 400 km to the ISS moves through a field that weakens as it goes, and a probe heading to Jupiter leaves Earth's field almost entirely. We need an expression for gravitational potential energy that works at any distance.
Remember from the unit Work, Energy and Simple Harmonic Motion: work done by a force changes energy, and when only conservative forces like gravity act, total mechanical energy (Ek + Ep) is conserved.
Eg = −GMm/r
The gravitational potential energy of a mass m at distance r from the centre of a mass M is
Eg = −GMm/r
Two features need explaining.
1. Where is zero? Only changes in potential energy matter, so we may choose the zero anywhere. For mgh we chose the floor. For planets and stars, the natural choice is r = ∞, where the masses no longer affect each other.
2. Why negative? Gravity attracts. To pull m away from M to infinity, you must do positive work against gravity, which raises Eg up to 0. So at every finite distance Eg is less than 0. The closer you are, the more negative Eg is: you are deeper in the "gravity well".
(Getting this formula needs the area under the F = GMm/r² curve from r to infinity, a calculus result you may see in MCV4U or first-year university. The answer is the GMm/r above.)
Change in potential energy: moving from r₁ to r₂,
ΔEg = GMm(1/r₁ − 1/r₂)
which is positive when r₂ > r₁ (moving away).
Gravitational potential energy against distance from Earth's centre. Eg is negative everywhere and rises toward 0 far away. An object whose total energy stays below zero is trapped in the "well".mgh is a special case
For a small height h near the surface, ΔEg = GMm(1/R − 1/(R + h)) ≈ GMm h/R² = m(GM/R²)h = mgh. So mgh is the special case for a nearly uniform field. Use mgh only when h is much smaller than R_E.
Worked exampleExample 1: Lifting a payload to the ISS
How much does the gravitational potential energy of a 1000 kg cargo capsule increase when it goes from Earth's surface to the ISS altitude (420 km)? Compare with mgh.
- r₁ = 6.37 × 10⁶ m, r₂ = 6.79 × 10⁶ m, GM = 3.982 × 10¹⁴ m³/s².
- ΔEg = GMm(1/r₁ − 1/r₂) = (3.982 × 10¹⁴)(1000)(1/6.37 × 10⁶ − 1/6.79 × 10⁶).
- 1/6.37 × 10⁶ − 1/6.79 × 10⁶ = 1.5699 × 10⁻⁷ − 1.4728 × 10⁻⁷ = 9.71 × 10⁻⁹ m⁻¹.
- ΔEg = (3.982 × 10¹⁷)(9.71 × 10⁻⁹) = 3.87 × 10⁹ J.
- mgh = (1000)(9.8)(4.2 × 10⁵) = 4.12 × 10⁹ J.
ΔEg ≈ 3.87 × 10⁹ J. mgh overestimates by about 6% because g gets weaker with height. (And this is only the lift: in orbit the capsule also needs about 2.9 × 10¹⁰ J of kinetic energy, about 7.6 times more.)
Energy of a satellite
For a circular orbit, mv²/r = GMm/r², so mv² = GMm/r and
- Ek = ½mv² = GMm/(2r)
- Eg = −GMm/r
- E_total = Ek + Eg = −GMm/(2r)
The total energy is negative (the satellite is bound) and exactly half of Eg. Also Ek = −E_total. To move to a higher orbit, the total energy must increase (become less negative), even though the satellite ends up moving slower.
Worked exampleExample 2: From low orbit to geostationary orbit
A 1500 kg satellite is moved from a circular orbit at r₁ = 6.79 × 10⁶ m to geostationary orbit at r₂ = 4.22 × 10⁷ m. How much energy must its engines supply (ignoring the fuel's own mass)?
- E_total = −GMm/(2r) for each orbit.
- E₁ = −(3.982 × 10¹⁴)(1500)/(2 × 6.79 × 10⁶) = −4.40 × 10¹⁰ J.
- E₂ = −(3.982 × 10¹⁴)(1500)/(2 × 4.22 × 10⁷) = −7.08 × 10⁹ J.
- ΔE = E₂ − E₁ = −0.708 × 10¹⁰ − (−4.40 × 10¹⁰) = 3.69 × 10¹⁰ J.
About 3.69 × 10¹⁰ J must be added. The satellite's speed drops from 7.66 km/s to 3.07 km/s, yet its total energy rises.
Escape speed
To escape completely, an object must reach infinity (where Eg = 0) with Ek ≥ 0. So its total energy at launch must be at least zero:
½mv² + (−GMm/r) = 0 → v_esc = √(2GM/r)
The object's own mass cancels again. From Earth's surface, v_esc = √(2(3.982 × 10¹⁴)/6.37 × 10⁶) = 11.2 km/s. Notice that v_esc = √2 × (circular orbital speed at the same r).
Escape speed explains a lot. The Moon's escape speed is only 2.37 km/s, and over billions of years it could not hold an atmosphere. Jupiter's escape speed is about 60 km/s, so it has kept even its lightest gas, hydrogen.
Worked exampleExample 3: How high will it go?
A probe is launched straight up from Earth's surface at 8.0 km/s. Ignoring air resistance and Earth's rotation, how high does it rise?
- Conservation of energy: ½mv² − GMm/R_E = 0 − GMm/r_max (Ek = 0 at the top).
- Cancel m: 1/r_max = 1/R_E − v²/(2GM) = 1/(6.37 × 10⁶) − (8.0 × 10³)²/(2 × 3.982 × 10¹⁴).
- 1/r_max = 1.5699 × 10⁻⁷ − 8.036 × 10⁻⁸ = 7.663 × 10⁻⁸ m⁻¹, so r_max = 1.305 × 10⁷ m.
- Height = 1.305 × 10⁷ − 6.37 × 10⁶ = 6.68 × 10⁶ m.
About 6.7 × 10⁶ m (6700 km) above the surface, more than one Earth radius. Using mgh would give only 3.3 × 10⁶ m, a huge underestimate, because g weakens with height.
Black holes
What if a mass were squeezed so small that its escape speed reached the speed of light, c = 3.00 × 10⁸ m/s? Setting √(2GM/r) = c gives
r_s = 2GM/c²
This is the Schwarzschild radius. A correct treatment needs Einstein's general relativity (Karl Schwarzschild found this solution in 1916), but it gives the same formula. If all of an object's mass is inside r_s, nothing, not even light, can get out. The sphere of radius r_s is the event horizon of a black hole.
- Stellar black holes form when very massive stars collapse at the end of their lives. They are a few to tens of solar masses.
- Supermassive black holes sit at the centres of galaxies: Sagittarius A\* has about 4 million solar masses (previous lesson).
- In 2015 the LIGO detectors first detected gravitational waves from two merging black holes, confirming another prediction of general relativity. You will compare Newton's and Einstein's views of gravity in Comparing Fields and the Fundamental Forces.
Away from the horizon, a black hole's gravity is no stronger than any other object of the same mass. If the Sun were replaced by a 1 solar-mass black hole, Earth's orbit would not change (though it would get very cold and dark).
A non-rotating black hole. Light and matter can fall in across the event horizon, but nothing inside it can get back out. The Schwarzschild radius is proportional to the mass.Worked exampleExample 4: Schwarzschild radius
Find the Schwarzschild radius of (a) the Sun (1.99 × 10³⁰ kg) and (b) Earth.
- (a) r_s = 2GM/c² = 2(6.67 × 10⁻¹¹)(1.99 × 10³⁰)/(3.00 × 10⁸)² = 2.655 × 10²⁰/9.00 × 10¹⁶ = 2.95 × 10³ m.
- (b) r_s = 2(6.67 × 10⁻¹¹)(5.97 × 10²⁴)/(9.00 × 10¹⁶) = 8.85 × 10⁻³ m.
(a) About 2.95 km: the Sun would have to be squeezed to a ball about 6 km across. (b) About 8.85 mm: Earth squeezed to the size of a marble. Neither will happen: the Sun is not massive enough to collapse into a black hole.
Just for funTo turn Earth into a black hole you would have to squeeze all 5.97 × 10²⁴ kg into a ball under 2 cm across. Good luck finding a vise that big.
Hands-on activityGravity well on a stretched sheet
You need: an old bedsheet or a large piece of stretchy fabric (spandex works well), two or three helpers (or chairs and clamps), a heavy ball (a grapefruit or a softball), and several marbles. Keep marbles away from small children (choking hazard).
- Hold the sheet tight and level at waist height. Put the heavy ball in the middle. The sheet dips: this models a gravity well (a picture of Eg, not of real space).
- Roll a marble straight toward the centre. It speeds up as it goes "downhill", just as falling objects gain Ek as Eg becomes more negative.
- Roll a marble sideways around the dip. With the right speed it circles several times before friction makes it spiral in. This models an orbit.
- Roll a marble fast enough from the edge so that it crosses the dip and rolls out the far side. This models a speed above escape speed.
- Replace the heavy ball with a lighter one. Is it easier or harder for marbles to escape?
What to look for: a deeper well (heavier ball) needs a faster marble to escape, just as v_esc = √(2GM/r) grows with M. Friction slowly removes energy so the marbles spiral in; real orbits in space have almost no friction, which is why they last.
Your turn
1Why is gravitational potential energy negative when we choose Eg = 0 at infinity?
Gravity attracts, so you must add energy (do positive work) to separate the masses to infinity, where Eg = 0. Starting below zero is the only way adding energy can bring you up to zero.
2Find Eg for a 1000 kg satellite on Earth's surface and at 420 km altitude.
Surface: −(3.982 × 10¹⁴)(1000)/(6.37 × 10⁶) = −6.25 × 10¹⁰ J. At 420 km: −(3.982 × 10¹⁷)/(6.79 × 10⁶) = −5.86 × 10¹⁰ J. (Higher is less negative.)
3Find the escape speed from the Moon's surface (M = 7.35 × 10²² kg, R = 1.74 × 10⁶ m).
v = √(2GM/R) = √(2(6.67 × 10⁻¹¹)(7.35 × 10²²)/(1.74 × 10⁶)) = 2.37 × 10³ m/s (2.37 km/s).
4For a 1000 kg satellite in the ISS orbit (r = 6.79 × 10⁶ m), find Ek, Eg and the total energy.
Ek = GMm/(2r) = (3.982 × 10¹⁷)/(1.358 × 10⁷) = 2.93 × 10¹⁰ J. Eg = −GMm/r = −5.86 × 10¹⁰ J. E_total = −2.93 × 10¹⁰ J.
5Find the Schwarzschild radius of a black hole of 10 solar masses.
r_s = 2G(10 × 1.99 × 10³⁰)/c² = 2.95 × 10⁴ m (about 30 km).
6Show that the escape speed is √2 times the circular orbital speed at the same radius.
v_esc = √(2GM/r) = √2 × √(GM/r) = √2 × v_orbit.
More practice: warm-up
1At what distance is Eg taken to be zero?
At infinity (infinite separation).
2Is the total energy of a satellite in a circular orbit positive or negative?
Negative (it is bound): E = −GMm/(2r).
3Does escape speed depend on the mass of the object being launched?
No. v = √(2GM/r) has no m in it.
4What is Earth's escape speed from the surface, to two significant digits?
About 11 km/s (11.2 km/s).
5What is the boundary of a black hole called?
The event horizon (at the Schwarzschild radius).
More practice: on your own
1How much work is needed to move a 5.0 kg mass from 2R_E to 3R_E from Earth's centre?
W = ΔEg = GMm(1/(2R_E) − 1/(3R_E)) = (3.982 × 10¹⁴)(5.0)(1/(1.274 × 10⁷) − 1/(1.911 × 10⁷)) = 5.2 × 10⁷ J.
2A rock falls from rest at a height of one Earth radius (r = 2R_E). With no air, how fast is it moving when it hits the surface?
½v² = GM(1/R_E − 1/(2R_E)) = GM/(2R_E). v = √(GM/R_E) = √(3.982 × 10¹⁴/6.37 × 10⁶) = 7.9 × 10³ m/s.
3What launch speed (straight up, no air) is needed to reach a height of 1000 km?
½v² = GM(1/R_E − 1/(R_E + h)) = 3.982 × 10¹⁴ (1.5699 × 10⁻⁷ − 1.3569 × 10⁻⁷) = 8.48 × 10⁶. v = 4.12 × 10³ m/s.
4Explain why moving a satellite to a higher circular orbit requires adding energy even though it ends up moving more slowly.
E_total = −GMm/(2r). A larger r makes E_total less negative, so energy must be added. Ek drops, but Eg rises (becomes less negative) by twice as much as Ek falls.
5A meteoroid starts essentially at rest very far from Earth and falls straight in. With what speed does it reach the top of the atmosphere (take r ≈ R_E)?
Energy: 0 = ½mv² − GMm/R_E, so v = √(2GM/R_E) = 11.2 km/s: the escape speed, run backwards.
Challenge
1A spacecraft in the ISS orbit (r = 6.79 × 10⁶ m) wants to escape Earth. How much must its speed increase (in one quick burn, ignoring the Sun)?
v_orbit = √(GM/r) = 7.66 km/s; v_esc at that r = √(2GM/r) = 10.83 km/s. Increase = 3.17 km/s. Starting from orbit is much cheaper than from the ground.
2Find the escape speed from the Sun starting at Earth's distance (1.50 × 10¹¹ m). Earth already orbits at 29.8 km/s. What extra speed (relative to the Sun) must a probe gain to leave the solar system?
v_esc = √(2GM_S/r) = √(2(6.67 × 10⁻¹¹)(1.99 × 10³⁰)/(1.50 × 10¹¹)) = 42.1 km/s. A probe launched in the direction of Earth's motion already has 29.8 km/s, so it needs about 12.3 km/s more, relative to the Sun (plus whatever it takes to climb out of Earth's own well).
3Find the Schwarzschild radius of Sagittarius A∗ (4.0 × 10⁶ solar masses) in metres and AU (1 AU = 1.50 × 10¹¹ m). Compare with S2's closest approach (about 120 AU).
r_s = 2G(4.0 × 10⁶)(1.99 × 10³⁰)/c² = 1.18 × 10¹⁰ m ≈ 0.079 AU. S2's closest approach is about 1500 times larger, so S2 safely orbits outside the horizon.
Check your understandingQuiz
1. With the zero of Eg at infinity, the gravitational potential energy of an object near Earth is
2. The total energy of a satellite in a circular orbit is
3. Earth's escape speed from the surface is about 11.2 km/s. A 2000 kg rocket and a 2 kg probe would need
4. If a planet's mass were doubled with its radius unchanged, its escape speed would be
5. The Schwarzschild radius of a black hole is proportional to
6. Why does mgh give the wrong answer for the energy needed to reach 6700 km above Earth?
For parents and teachersBig idea (D2.1, D2.2): Eg = −GMm/r works at any distance. The minus sign means the system is bound. Setting total energy to zero gives escape speed, and setting escape speed to c gives the size of a black hole.
How to help: Ask your teen to explain the minus sign using the "gravity well" picture. Check that they can explain why a satellite in a higher orbit has more total energy but less speed. The stretched-sheet activity makes the well visible; it needs two or three people.
Common difficulties:
- Sign errors with negative energies: −0.7 × 10¹⁰ is greater than −4.4 × 10¹⁰.
- Using mgh over large heights.
- Subtracting reciprocals: compute 1/r₁ and 1/r₂ separately with enough digits before subtracting.
- Thinking a black hole "sucks in" everything nearby. Far from the horizon its gravity is like any other mass.
Safety: marbles are a choking hazard for young children.