Grade by Grade
E. Canada, 1982 to the Present · Canada, 1982 to the Present

The Truth and Reconciliation Commission and the Path to Reconciliation

E3.3 E2.3 E2.1 E3.1 A1.3 A1.5About 75 minutes
Learning goals
  • I can describe how survivors brought the truth about residential schools to national attention.
  • I can explain the Settlement Agreement, the 2008 apology and the work of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (2008–2015).
  • I can describe the 94 Calls to Action and give examples of ones that have and have not been acted on.
  • I can explain the significance of Idle No More, the MMIWG Inquiry and the National Day for Truth and Reconciliation.
  • I can assess whether apologies and commemoration are enough to address past wrongs.

Words to know

survivor
A person who attended a residential school. Survivors' testimony is at the heart of the TRC's work.
intergenerational trauma
Harm that passes from one generation to the next, for example when the effects of residential schools affect survivors' children and grandchildren.
truth commission
An official body that gathers testimony and records about past wrongs so that a society can understand and address them.
Calls to Action
The TRC's 94 recommendations (2015) to governments and other parts of society to address the legacy of residential schools and advance reconciliation.
reconciliation
In the TRC's words, establishing and maintaining a mutually respectful relationship between Indigenous and non-Indigenous peoples.
cultural genocide
The destruction of the structures and practices that allow a group to continue as a group, such as its language, spiritual practices and ways of raising children. The TRC used this term for residential school policy.
UNDRIP
The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (2007), which sets minimum standards for the rights of Indigenous peoples.

Listening to survivors

Between 2008 and 2015, more than 6 500 people came forward to share their experiences with the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada (TRC). Most were survivors of residential schools. Many were telling their stories publicly for the first time. Their courage changed how Canada understands its own history.

This lesson is about what happened after the last schools closed: how survivors and First Nations, Inuit and Métis leaders brought the truth into the open, what governments and churches did in response, and what reconciliation means and asks of every Canadian, including you.

Remember from Grade 8 and before

In Grade 8 you learned that residential schools were part of a government policy to assimilate First Nations, Inuit and Métis children, that children were separated from their families and often forbidden to speak their languages, and that many suffered neglect and abuse. The TRC estimated that more than 150 000 children attended. The last federally run school, in Saskatchewan, closed in 1996.

A note before you begin

This topic can be upsetting, especially for people whose families were affected. It is okay to pause and talk with someone you trust. The National Indian Residential School Crisis Line offers support 24 hours a day at 1-866-925-4419. The Hope for Wellness Help Line (1-855-242-3310) also offers support to all Indigenous people in Canada.

Breaking the silence (1990s)

For decades, many survivors did not talk about what had happened. In 1990, Phil Fontaine, then leader of the Assembly of Manitoba Chiefs and later National Chief of the Assembly of First Nations, spoke publicly on national television about the abuse he and others had experienced at residential school. Others came forward. Survivors began to sue the federal government and the churches that ran the schools.

In 1996, the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples (created after Oka) devoted a large part of its report to residential schools. In 1998 the federal government issued a Statement of Reconciliation and funded the Aboriginal Healing Foundation to support community healing projects.

The Settlement Agreement and the apology

To resolve thousands of lawsuits, survivors, the federal government, the churches and Indigenous organizations reached the Indian Residential Schools Settlement Agreement, which took effect in 2007. It included:

  • a Common Experience Payment for every former student;
  • an Independent Assessment Process for claims of serious abuse;
  • funding for healing and commemoration;
  • the creation of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission.

On June 11, 2008, Prime Minister Stephen Harper stood in the House of Commons and apologized on behalf of the Government of Canada. He said the policy of assimilation was wrong and had caused great harm, and that "there is no place in Canada for the attitudes that inspired the Indian Residential Schools system to ever prevail again." First Nations, Inuit and Métis leaders were invited onto the floor of the House to respond. Many survivors watched together across the country. Reactions differed: some survivors felt the apology was a meaningful moment of recognition; others felt that words meant little without action.

Truth and reconciliation: key steps since 19901990Phil Fontainespeakspublicly aboutresidentialschool1996RCAP report;last federallyrun schoolcloses2007SettlementAgreementtakes effect2008Federalapology in theHouse ofCommons2015TRC releases94 Calls toAction2019MMIWG Inquiryfinal report2021Sept. 30national day;UNDRIP Act2022Pope Francisapologizes inMaskwacîs
Dates are evenly spaced, not to scale. The process was driven by survivors and Indigenous leaders at every step; governments and churches mostly responded.

The Truth and Reconciliation Commission (2008–2015)

The TRC was led by three commissioners: Justice Murray Sinclair (Anishinaabe), the chair; Chief Wilton Littlechild (Cree), a lawyer and residential school survivor; and Marie Wilson, a journalist with long experience in the North. Over six years it held seven national events and many community hearings, gathered millions of records, and listened to survivors.

In June 2015, it released its summary report and 94 Calls to Action, with the full report following in December 2015. The report concluded that residential school policy was part of a policy of cultural genocide. The records it gathered are kept at the National Centre for Truth and Reconciliation at the University of Manitoba.

The 94 Calls to Action (2015)Truth andReconciliationCommissionChild welfareCalls 1–5EducationCalls 6–12Language and cultureCalls 13–17HealthCalls 18–24JusticeCalls 25–42ReconciliationCalls 43–94:governments, churches,media, sports, business,newcomers...
The first 42 Calls to Action address the legacy of residential schools in five areas. Calls 43 to 94 are about reconciliation: they speak to governments and also to churches, schools, media, sports, businesses and newcomers to Canada.

From Calls to Action to action?

Some Calls to Action have been acted on:

  • Call 80 asked for a statutory holiday. Since 2021, September 30 has been the National Day for Truth and Reconciliation for federal workplaces. It is also Orange Shirt Day, inspired by Phyllis Webstad (Northern Secwépemc), whose new orange shirt was taken away on her first day at residential school in 1973.
  • Call 94 asked Canada to change the citizenship oath to include respecting treaties with Indigenous peoples. This was done in 2021.
  • Call 58 asked the Pope to apologize in Canada. Pope Francis did so at Maskwacîs, Alberta, on July 25, 2022.
  • Calls 62 and 63 asked for school curriculum on residential schools, treaties and Indigenous contributions. Ontario revised its curriculum, including this course, to include them.

Many others, especially on child welfare, health and justice, are still in progress. Indigenous-led reviews, such as yearly reports by the Yellowhead Institute, have found that only a small number of the 94 have been fully completed. Reconciliation is a long process, not a single event.

Related movements and inquiries

  • Idle No More (2012–2013): started by four women in Saskatchewan (Jessica Gordon, Sylvia McAdam, Sheelah McLean and Nina Wilson) to oppose federal laws that changed environmental protections and reserve land rules without consultation. It spread through social media into round dances, teach-ins and rallies across Canada and beyond.
  • Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls (MMIWG): after years of advocacy by families, a National Inquiry reported in June 2019 with 231 Calls for Justice. It concluded that the violence amounted to genocide. The REDress Project by Métis artist Jaime Black, which hangs empty red dresses in public places, has become a symbol of remembrance.
  • 2021: in May, Tk'emlúps te Secwépemc in British Columbia announced that ground-penetrating radar had found what are believed to be about 200 potential unmarked burials near the former Kamloops Indian Residential School. Other communities have since carried out searches. Many Canadians who had not paid attention before began to learn this history.
  • 2021: Parliament passed the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, committing Canada to align its laws with UNDRIP.
  • Child welfare: the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal found in 2016 that Canada discriminated against First Nations children by underfunding child welfare on reserves. This led to a large compensation settlement and to orders that Canada fully apply Jordan's Principle (adopted by the House of Commons in 2007), named after Jordan River Anderson of Norway House Cree Nation, which aims to make sure First Nations children get the services they need without delays over which government pays.
The TRC's description of reconciliationAwarenesslearning the truthabout the pastAcknowledgementadmitting the harmthat was doneAtonementmaking amends forthe causesActionchanging behaviourtoday
The TRC described reconciliation as a process that requires awareness of the past, acknowledgement of the harm, atonement for its causes, and action to change behaviour. An apology is one step, not the whole path.
Worked example

Let's assess the significance of the 2008 apology (E3.3, A1.5)

Was the 2008 federal apology for residential schools historically significant? Use criteria and at least two perspectives.

  1. Criterion 1: Did it cause change? It was the first time a prime minister apologized in the House of Commons for residential schools. It came with the Settlement Agreement and the TRC, which led to the 94 Calls to Action. That is real change.
  2. Criterion 2: Was it lasting and widely felt? It is still quoted, taught and debated. Survivors across Canada watched it.
  3. Perspective of some survivors: it was the recognition they had waited decades for, and a moment of validation.
  4. Perspective of other survivors and leaders: an apology without action is incomplete. They pointed to ongoing problems such as child welfare and drinking water on reserves.
  5. Corroborating evidence: later actions (September 30, the UNDRIP Act) and unmet Calls to Action both matter for judging its significance.

Model judgement: The apology was significant as a turning point in public acknowledgement and because it was tied to the TRC. Its full significance depends on what followed: an apology is part of reconciliation, but by the TRC's own definition it must lead to atonement and action.

Hands-on activity

Track three Calls to Action

You need: internet access, paper, and about 40 minutes.

  1. Find the TRC's 94 Calls to Action (the National Centre for Truth and Reconciliation website posts them).
  2. Choose three: one about education, one about child welfare or health, and one from the reconciliation section.
  3. For each, write: what it asks, who it is addressed to, and its status today. Trackers by Indigenous organizations and news outlets (for example the Yellowhead Institute's reports or CBC's Beyond 94) can help. Note the date each source was last updated.
  4. Choose one action you or your family could take, such as learning the history of the treaty land you live on, attending a community September 30 event, or reading a book by an Indigenous author.

Look for: accurate descriptions, dated sources (A1.3: is the information current?), and a realistic personal action.

Your turn

1

What were the main parts of the 2007 Indian Residential Schools Settlement Agreement?

2

Who apologized in the House of Commons on June 11, 2008?

3

Name the three TRC commissioners.

4

How many Calls to Action did the TRC issue, and when?

5

What is September 30, and who inspired Orange Shirt Day?

6

What did the TRC conclude about residential school policy?

More practice: warm-up

1

About how many children attended residential schools, according to the TRC?

2

When did the last federally run residential school close?

3

Where did Pope Francis apologize in July 2022?

4

Which movement was started by four women in Saskatchewan in 2012?

5

Where are the TRC's records kept?

More practice: on your own

1

Why did survivors' lawsuits matter in the creation of the TRC?

2

Give one example of a Call to Action that has been completed and one area where progress has been slow.

3

What did the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal find in 2016?

4

Explain the TRC's four-part description of reconciliation.

5

Why might a source about Calls to Action from 2016 be less useful today?

Challenge

1

"Apologies are enough to make up for past wrongs." Do you agree? Support your answer with evidence from this lesson.

2

Use continuity and change: how did the relationship between the federal government and First Nations, Inuit and Métis peoples change between 1982 and 2022, and what stayed the same?

3

Why do historians say survivors were the main agents of change in this story? Give two pieces of evidence.

Check your understanding

Quiz

1.

What created the Truth and Reconciliation Commission?

2.

Who chaired the TRC?

3.

How many Calls to Action did the TRC issue in 2015?

4.

Which Call to Action led to the National Day for Truth and Reconciliation?

5.

What did the 2021 UNDRIP Act commit Canada to do?

6.

According to the TRC, reconciliation requires...

For parents and teachers

Big idea: This lesson addresses E3.3 (the significance of public acknowledgement and commemoration of past wrongs, including residential schools) and E2.3 (the relationship between governments and First Nations, Métis and Inuit, including the TRC and Idle No More). It practises judging significance (A1.5) and checking whether a source is current (A1.3).

Sensitive content: This lesson deals with harm to children. Details of abuse are not described. There is deliberately no joke block. Watch for signs that your teen is upset, especially if your family has a connection to residential schools. Support: National Indian Residential School Crisis Line, 1-866-925-4419 (24 hours); Hope for Wellness Help Line, 1-855-242-3310.

Common difficulties:

  • Thinking reconciliation is finished. Many Calls to Action remain incomplete.
  • Treating Indigenous peoples only as victims. Emphasize survivors' and leaders' agency: their activism, lawsuits and testimony drove every step.
  • Mixing up the TRC (94 Calls to Action) and the MMIWG Inquiry (231 Calls for Justice).

How to help: On September 30, consider attending a local event or reading a book by an Indigenous author together. Let your teen lead the conversation, and listen.