Reading and Literature Studies · Reading Literary TextsPoetry, Part 2: Modernism, Allusion and Style in Yeats and Eliot, and How Achebe Answered Yeats
2.3 1.5 1.8About 75 minutes
Learning goals- I can identify features of modernist poetry, such as fragmentation, allusion, irony and free verse.
- I can trace an allusion and explain how it adds layers of meaning.
- I can analyse diction, imagery and syntax in a modernist poem.
- I can explain how a later writer (Chinua Achebe) answered Yeats's poem from a different perspective.
Words to know
modernism
A movement in the arts from about 1910 to 1940 that broke with traditional forms, using fragmentation, allusion, shifting perspectives and irony to express a world changed by war and technology.
allusion
A brief, often indirect reference to another text, person, event or work of art.
gyre
A spiral or circling motion. For Yeats, also a symbol of the cycles of history.
apocalyptic
Describing the end of the world or a total, violent transformation.
dramatic monologue
A poem spoken by a character (not the poet) to a silent listener, revealing the speaker's personality.
epigraph
A quotation placed at the start of a text to suggest its theme.
writing back
A postcolonial practice in which writers from colonized places respond to, revise or challenge texts from the colonizing culture.
Hook: a headline poem
Some lines escape their poems. Journalists, politicians and bloggers quote Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold whenever the world seems to be coming apart: wars, elections, pandemics, market crashes. Many who quote it have never read the poem.
The line comes from W. B. Yeats's The Second Coming, written in 1919, just after the First World War, during the Russian Revolution and as the Irish War of Independence began. In this lesson you will read the whole poem's argument, learn how modernist poets built meaning out of fragments and allusions, and see how a Nigerian novelist turned that famous line into the title of one of the most widely read novels of the twentieth century.
Remember from Grade 11
In ENG3U you analysed elements of style (imagery, sound, syntax, voice) in Keats, Hughes and Tagore, and the dramatic monologue in Browning. In Grade 10 you studied symbol, myth and allusion. Modernism uses all of these, but fractures them: voices shift, images collide, and the meaning is built by the reader.
A rough contrast between Victorian and modernist poetry. These are tendencies, not rules: Hardy and Hopkins sit on the border, and Yeats keeps some rhyme while sounding thoroughly modern.Yeats's The Second Coming (1920)
W. B. Yeats (1865 to 1939) was an Irish poet who won the Nobel Prize in Literature in 1923. The Second Coming was published in 1920. It has two stanzas.
Stanza 1 (paraphrase): a falcon circles in a widening gyre until it cannot hear the falconer. Then the poem names what this means:
Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;
Anarchy and a blood-dimmed tide are let loose, and innocence is drowned. The stanza ends with a judgment on its own time:
The best lack all conviction, while the worst Are full of passionate intensity.
Stanza 2 (paraphrase): surely, the speaker says, some revelation, some Second Coming, must be near. (In Christian belief, the Second Coming is Christ's promised return.) But as soon as he says the words, a vision rises from Spiritus Mundi (Latin, spirit of the world, Yeats's term for a shared store of images): in a desert, a shape with a lion's body and a man's head, its gaze blank and pitiless, moves slowly while desert birds wheel around it. The vision fades, but the speaker now knows that two thousand years of history were troubled into nightmare by a rocking cradle (the birth of Christ). The poem ends with a question: what rough beast, whose time has finally come, Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?
Yeats's opening image as a diagram. A trained falcon flies in ever-widening circles (a gyre) until it can no longer hear the person who controls it. The image becomes a picture of a world losing its centre after the First World War.Worked exampleLet's analyse diction and syntax
Analyse the style of the first stanza: diction, syntax and imagery.
- Diction: Mere anarchy is surprising: mere usually means only, but here it suggests anarchy that is pure and total, and also oddly ordinary. Loosed makes violence sound like an animal let off its leash.
- Syntax: the stanza's sentences are short and declarative, separated by semicolons: Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold. Each clause lands like a news bulletin. There is no I in stanza 1, only impersonal statements, which makes them sound like laws of history.
- Imagery: the falcon and falconer show a breakdown of control; the blood-dimmed tide makes violence a flood; the ceremony of innocence is drowned turns innocence into a ritual that is destroyed.
- Antithesis: The best lack all conviction, while the worst / Are full of passionate intensity. The balanced sentence sets two groups against each other, and the line break after worst leaves the reader waiting for the blow.
- Effect: the style is calm and precise while describing chaos; that contrast makes the vision more frightening.
Stanza 1 uses impersonal, declarative syntax, sharp diction (mere, loosed) and images of lost control to present collapse as a law of history; its calm voice makes the chaos more chilling.
The web of allusion and context around The Second Coming. Modernist poems pack in references; tracing them is part of reading. The last branch shows a later writer answering the poem.Worked exampleLet's trace an allusion
Explain the allusion in the poem's title and final line.
- Identify the source: the Second Coming is the Christian belief that Christ will return; Bethlehem is the town of Christ's birth.
- Recall the expectation: in Christian scripture, the Second Coming brings final judgment and peace.
- See the twist: Yeats's speaker expects a revelation, but what is coming is a rough beast with a blank, pitiless gaze, slouching (a clumsy, ugly verb) toward the birthplace of Christ.
- Meaning: the allusion turns hope into dread: the next age of history will be a violent inversion of the Christian age, not its fulfilment. The poem ends with a question, so even the speaker cannot say exactly what is coming.
- Context: written in 1919, the image speaks to a world that had just seen mass death in war and revolution.
The title and ending invert a Christian promise: instead of Christ's return bringing peace, a pitiless beast moves toward Bethlehem, expressing Yeats's fear that the coming age would be brutal.
T. S. Eliot's Prufrock: modernism from inside a mind
T. S. Eliot (1888 to 1965) published The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock in the magazine Poetry in 1915. It opens with an epigraph in Italian from Dante's Inferno, spoken by a soul in hell who tells his story only because he believes no one will ever repeat it. Then Prufrock begins:
Let us go then, you and I, When the evening is spread out against the sky Like a patient etherized upon a table;
The third line is a shock: a romantic evening sky compared to an anaesthetized patient on an operating table. That clash of the lyrical and the clinical is a modernist signature.
What happens (paraphrase): Prufrock, a timid middle-aged man, walks through foggy city streets toward a drawing room where women come and go / Talking of Michelangelo. He wants to ask an overwhelming question (perhaps a declaration of love) but keeps postponing it. He worries about his thinning hair and thin arms, and sums up his cautious life in one line:
I have measured out my life with coffee spoons;
He insists he is not Prince Hamlet, only a minor attendant lord, and ends imagining mermaids singing, though not to him.
Features: a dramatic monologue that drifts; fragments and sudden jumps; allusions to Dante, Michelangelo, Hamlet and the Bible; irony (a love song with no love and no song).
Writing back: Chinua Achebe and Things Fall Apart
In 1958, the Nigerian writer Chinua Achebe (1930 to 2013) published Things Fall Apart, a novel about Okonkwo, a respected man in an Igbo community, at the time when British missionaries and colonial government arrive. Achebe took his title from Yeats's line and used lines from the poem as his epigraph. (The novel is under copyright, so it is described here rather than quoted.)
Why does this matter for critical literacy?
- Yeats's poem imagines Western civilization falling apart; its centre is Christian Europe.
- Achebe's novel shows a different centre: a complex Igbo society with its own laws, religion, arts and politics, and it is that world that is torn apart, by colonialism.
- Achebe writes back: he borrows a famous line from the colonizing culture's literature and turns its perspective around. The rough beast arriving, from an Igbo point of view, might look a lot like the colonizers.
This is a powerful kind of extending understanding: one text changes how we read another. After Achebe, it is hard to read Yeats's centre without asking: whose centre?
Just for funYeats's falcon may be the most famous bird in English poetry for not listening. Anyone who has ever called a teenager in for dinner from the far end of the backyard knows exactly how the falconer feels.
Hands-on activityBuild an allusion web
You need: a large sheet of paper or a whiteboard, coloured pens, and an internet connection or a library dictionary of allusions.
- Write The Second Coming in the centre.
- Draw branches for every allusion or contextual reference you can find: the Second Coming, Bethlehem, the sphinx-like figure, Spiritus Mundi, the falcon, 1919.
- On each branch, write in a few words what the reference meant before Yeats and what it means in the poem.
- Add one branch for a later text that alludes to Yeats (Achebe's Things Fall Apart), and one for a song, headline or film you find that quotes the poem today.
- Circle the branch that changes the poem's meaning most, and write two sentences explaining why.
What to look for: accurate sources for each allusion, a clear before / in the poem contrast, and a thoughtful choice of the most important branch (many students choose Bethlehem, because the inversion of the Christian promise is the poem's main twist).
Your turn
1Name three features of modernist poetry.
Any three: free verse or broken rhythms; fragmentation and sudden jumps; allusion; irony and doubt rather than resolution; shifting voices or perspectives; clashing images (lyrical with clinical).
2Paraphrase Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold.
Everything is breaking down; the central authority or force that kept things together can no longer do so.
3What is the falcon an image of?
Loss of control: as the falcon circles wider it can no longer hear the falconer, just as society moves out of reach of the forces that once guided it.
4Explain the allusion in Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born.
Bethlehem is Christ's birthplace; instead of Christ's return, a rough beast is coming to be born there, an ominous inversion of the Christian promise of the Second Coming.
5Why is Like a patient etherized upon a table a surprising simile?
It compares a romantic evening sky to an unconscious surgical patient: lyrical expectation meets a clinical, lifeless image, suggesting numbness and paralysis.
6What does I have measured out my life with coffee spoons suggest about Prufrock?
His life is made of small, cautious, routine social moments, measured in tiny portions, with no grand action or risk.
7How did Chinua Achebe use Yeats's poem?
He took the title Things Fall Apart (1958) and an epigraph from it for a novel about an Igbo community disrupted by British colonialism, turning the poem's perspective around (writing back).
More practice: warm-up
1When was The Second Coming written, and when published?
Written in 1919, published in 1920.
A quotation at the start of a text that suggests its theme.
3What language is the epigraph to Prufrock in, and where is it from?
Italian, from Dante's Inferno.
Latin for spirit of the world: Yeats's term for a shared store of images from which visions come.
5Who wrote Things Fall Apart, and when?
More practice: on your own
1Explain how the antithesis The best lack all conviction, while the worst / Are full of passionate intensity works.
It balances two groups in one sentence: good people are paralysed by doubt, while bad people act with energy and certainty. The line break after worst creates suspense before the blow. It describes a world where conviction itself has become dangerous.
2Why does Yeats end with a question rather than a statement?
It keeps the future uncertain and threatening: the speaker senses something terrible coming but cannot name it, which is more unsettling than a clear prediction.
3How is Prufrock both a love song and not one?
It is addressed to you and circles around an overwhelming question, perhaps a declaration of love, but Prufrock never asks it; the title is ironic: no love is declared and no song is sung.
4Explain what writing back means, using Achebe as the example.
A writer from a colonized culture responds to a text from the colonizing culture. Achebe borrowed Yeats's line to show that an Igbo world, with its own centre, was torn apart by colonialism, challenging the European-centred perspective of the original.
5Which reading of centre do you find more persuasive after reading about Achebe: Yeats's or Achebe's? Explain.
Model: Achebe's adds something essential. Yeats's centre is European Christian civilization; Achebe shows there are many centres, and that for colonized peoples the falling apart began with Europe's arrival. Both can be held together, but Achebe's question (whose centre?) deepens any reading.
Challenge
1Argue whether The Second Coming is best read as a prophecy, a response to its historical moment, or both.
Model: both. Its details (the blood-dimmed tide, anarchy loosed) clearly respond to the violence of 1919, but the impersonal syntax and mythic images (the gyre, the beast) lift it into a vision of historical cycles, which is why readers keep applying it to new crises. Look for evidence for each side and a reasoned conclusion.
2Compare how Yeats and Eliot use imagery to show a modern world in crisis.
Yeats uses vast, mythic images (a falcon lost in the sky, a tide of blood, a desert beast): crisis on the scale of history. Eliot uses small, urban, clinical images (an etherized patient, coffee spoons, foggy streets): crisis inside one paralysed mind. Both show a loss of meaning, one public, one private.
3Apply a postcolonial lens to the rough beast: from whose perspective is it a monster?
From Yeats's European speaker's perspective, the beast is the terrifying end of Christian civilization. From the perspective of colonized peoples (as Achebe suggests), the arrival of European power in the 1800s and 1900s was itself the rough beast that brought their worlds' order to an end. The lens shows that the poem's apocalypse is defined by its speaker's position.
Check your understandingQuiz
1. Which is a typical feature of modernist poetry?
2. In The Second Coming, the falcon that cannot hear the falconer represents...
3. Bethlehem in the last line is an allusion to...
4. Like a patient etherized upon a table is surprising because it...
5. Achebe's title Things Fall Apart is an example of...
For parents and teachersWhat this lesson teaches: ENG4U Reading 2.3 (elements of style: diction, syntax, imagery and allusion in modernist poetry), 1.5 (extending understanding by connecting texts: Yeats and Achebe) and 1.8 (critical literacy: whose perspective a text assumes).
How to help at home:
- Search a news site for the centre cannot hold and look at how the line is used. Ask your teen: Does the article use it the way Yeats meant it?
- Ask them to explain Achebe's writing back in one sentence.
Common difficulties:
- Feeling lost in a modernist poem. That is normal; paraphrase stanza by stanza and trace one allusion at a time.
- Looking up allusions but not interpreting them. Ask: What did it mean before, and what does it mean here?
- Treating Western texts as the default centre. The Achebe connection models how to question that.
Facts used: Yeats (1865 to 1939) won the Nobel Prize in Literature in 1923; The Second Coming was written in 1919 and published in 1920. Eliot (1888 to 1965) published Prufrock in Poetry in June 1915. Achebe (1930 to 2013) published Things Fall Apart in 1958. Short quotations are checked against the Poetry Foundation (Yeats) and the University of Toronto's Representative Poetry Online (Eliot); the rest is paraphrased.