D. The World, 1789–1900 · The World, 1789–1900Nationalism and Unification: Italy, Germany and the Breakup of Empires
D2 D3 D1 A1.4 A1.7About 75 minutes
Learning goals- I can explain what nationalism is and how it could unite or divide states.
- I can explain how Italy and Germany were unified, and the roles of Cavour, Garibaldi, Mazzini and Bismarck.
- I can describe how nationalism challenged multinational empires such as the Ottoman and Austrian empires.
- I can assess the role of individuals versus broader forces in historical change.
Words to know
unification
Joining several states or territories into one state.
Realpolitik
Politics based on practical power and interests rather than ideals; associated with Bismarck.
Risorgimento
"Resurgence": the movement for Italian unification.
plebiscite
A direct vote by citizens on one question, such as whether to join a new state.
multinational empire
A state that rules many peoples with different languages and identities, such as the Ottoman and Austrian empires.
Dual Monarchy
Austria-Hungary after 1867: one emperor, two partly self-governing halves (Austria and Hungary).
What is a nation?
In 1789, most Europeans felt loyal to a village, a region, a religion or a ruler. Over the next century, more and more people came to see themselves as members of a nation: a large group sharing a language, history and culture, which (nationalists argued) should have its own state.
Nationalism could work in two directions:
- Uniting: many small states that shared a culture could join into one (Italy, Germany).
- Dividing: peoples inside large multinational empires could break away (Greeks, Serbs and others from the Ottoman Empire; Hungarians demanding self-rule from Austria).
Historians debate whether nations are ancient or constructed in the modern era through schools, newspapers, maps, railways and wars. Much evidence from this century supports the second view: governments worked hard to make citizens feel national.
Italy: the Risorgimento
In 1815, Italy was divided into several states. Austria ruled Lombardy and Venetia directly and influenced others; the Pope ruled the Papal States in the centre; a Bourbon king ruled the south (the Kingdom of the Two Sicilies). Revolts in 1820–1821, 1831 and 1848 all failed.
Three very different men are linked to unification:
- Giuseppe Mazzini, the idealist, founded Young Italy (1831) and preached a democratic, republican Italy created by the people.
- Count Camillo di Cavour, prime minister of the northern kingdom of Piedmont-Sardinia, was a practical liberal. He modernized Piedmont's economy and army and used diplomacy. He secretly allied with Napoleon III of France, and together they defeated Austria in 1859. Piedmont gained Lombardy, and states in central Italy voted in plebiscites to join.
- Giuseppe Garibaldi, a soldier and nationalist hero, led about a thousand volunteers, the Redshirts, to Sicily in 1860. Joined by local rebels, they conquered Sicily and Naples. Although a republican, Garibaldi handed his conquests to King Victor Emmanuel II of Piedmont.
The Kingdom of Italy was proclaimed in 1861. Venetia was added in 1866 and Rome in 1870, when French troops protecting the Pope withdrew during the Franco-Prussian War.
Unification was not the end of the story. Only a small minority of people spoke standard Italian at home. The north and the much poorer south were very different, and the new state fought a long, violent campaign against rural rebellion and banditry in the south in the 1860s. A remark attributed to the politician Massimo d'Azeglio sums it up: having made Italy, the next task was to make Italians.
Italy was unified by a mix of diplomacy and war from above, and popular nationalism from below.Germany: blood and iron
In 1815, the German Confederation was a loose group of 39 states led by Austria. Prussia grew stronger through industry and the Zollverein, a customs union that excluded Austria. The liberal attempt at unity in 1848 failed.
In 1862, Otto von Bismarck became minister-president of Prussia. In a famous speech he said that the great questions of the day would be decided not by speeches and majority votes, as in 1848, but by "iron and blood". He practised Realpolitik and used three short wars:
- Denmark (1864): Prussia and Austria together took Schleswig and Holstein.
- Austria (1866): Prussia defeated Austria in seven weeks, pushed it out of German affairs and created the North German Confederation.
- France (1870–1871): Bismarck edited a diplomatic telegram (the Ems Dispatch) to provoke France into declaring war. The southern German states joined Prussia. After victory, the German Empire was proclaimed in the Hall of Mirrors at Versailles on 18 January 1871, with the Prussian king as Kaiser Wilhelm I. Germany took Alsace-Lorraine from France, creating lasting French resentment.
Even more than Italy's, German unification was mainly from above: an authoritarian, military state led it, and parliament had limited power.
Three wars in seven years turned Prussia into the German Empire, which became one of Europe's leading industrial and military powers by 1900.Nationalism and the multinational empires
- Ottoman Empire: the Greek War of Independence (1821–1830) won independence with help from Britain, France and Russia, and inspired Romantic writers across Europe. Serbia won self-rule, and at the Congress of Berlin (1878) Serbia, Montenegro and Romania were recognized as independent. The Ottoman response, reform from within, is the subject of a later lesson.
- Austrian Empire: after defeat in 1866, the emperor made the Compromise of 1867, creating the Dual Monarchy of Austria-Hungary. Hungarians gained self-government, but Czechs, Poles, Croats, Serbs, Romanians and others did not get the same status.
- Russian Empire: governments pursued Russification, forcing Russian language and culture on Poles, Ukrainians, Finns and others. Poles rose up in 1830 and 1863 and were defeated.
Nationalism around the world
Nationalism was not only European. Canada's Confederation in 1867 created a new country for reasons that included defence, railways and trade (you may remember Confederation from earlier grades). The Indian National Congress was founded in 1885. In Japan, Meiji leaders built a strong national identity around the emperor. And Jewish nationalism, Zionism, took organized form when Theodor Herzl published The Jewish State (1896) and called the First Zionist Congress (1897), partly in response to rising antisemitism in Europe.
Nationalism had a dark side too. It could define some people as outsiders, fuel antisemitism and racism, and justify expansion abroad, themes that lead into the age of imperialism.
Worked exampleModelled example: Individuals or forces?
Question: Did Bismarck unify Germany, or would it have happened anyway?
- The case for Bismarck: he chose the timing of each war, isolated each enemy diplomatically, kept Austria out, and edited the Ems Dispatch to bring on war with France. Without him, unification might have come later, or differently (perhaps more liberal, or including Austria).
- The case for broader forces: the Zollverein had already tied German economies to Prussia; industrialization gave Prussia railways and weapons; nationalist feeling was widespread after 1848; Austria was weakened by its multinational problems.
- Weigh them: forces made unification likely; Bismarck determined its form (Prussian-led, monarchical, without Austria) and timing (1864–1871).
- Write a thesis that reflects both.
Thesis: Long-term economic and nationalist forces made German unification likely, but Bismarck's Realpolitik decided when it happened and gave the new Germany its authoritarian, Prussian-dominated form.
Just for funGaribaldi was so popular in Britain that a biscuit, the Garibaldi (currants pressed between thin layers of dough), was named after him in the 1860s and is still sold today. Few revolutionaries end up in a cookie tin.
Hands-on activityMake a nation: a household identity kit
You need: paper, coloured pencils or markers, and 20 minutes. Optional: a grown-up or sibling.
Nations were often built with symbols and stories. Design an identity kit for your household (or an imaginary country):
- A flag with symbols that stand for shared values.
- A founding story (two or three sentences).
- A national holiday and how it is celebrated.
- One rule about which language or customs are used.
Then reflect: Who does your kit include? Could anyone feel left out by your language rule or founding story? Connect this to Italy ("make Italians") or Russification.
Look for: an understanding that symbols and stories create belonging, and that they can also exclude.
Your turn
1How could nationalism both unite and divide states? Give an example of each.
Unite: small states joined to form Italy and Germany. Divide: peoples in multinational empires broke away or demanded self-rule, such as the Greeks from the Ottoman Empire or Hungarians in the Austrian Empire.
2Compare the roles of Cavour and Garibaldi.
Cavour used diplomacy and alliance (with Napoleon III) and modernized Piedmont; Garibaldi led volunteer soldiers who conquered Sicily and Naples, then handed them to the king.
Politics based on power and practical interests rather than ideals; associated with Bismarck.
4Name Bismarck's three wars and what each achieved.
Denmark (1864): Schleswig-Holstein. Austria (1866): Austria pushed out of German affairs; North German Confederation. France (1870–71): southern states joined; German Empire proclaimed; Alsace-Lorraine taken.
5What was the Compromise of 1867?
It created the Dual Monarchy of Austria-Hungary, giving Hungary self-government under the same emperor.
6Why was Italian unification incomplete in 1861?
Venetia (Austrian until 1866) and Rome (protected by French troops until 1870) were not yet included; and the people did not yet share one language or identity.
7Give one example of nationalism outside Europe in this period.
Any one: Canadian Confederation (1867); the Indian National Congress (1885); Meiji Japan's national identity; Zionism (1890s).
More practice: warm-up
2Who became the first king of united Italy?
3Where was the German Empire proclaimed in 1871?
In the Hall of Mirrors at Versailles.
4Which territory did Germany take from France in 1871?
5Which empire did Greece win independence from?
More practice: on your own
1Why is German unification described as "from above"?
It was carried out by the Prussian state, army and Bismarck through war and diplomacy, not by a popular or parliamentary movement; the new empire gave parliament limited power.
2What problems did the new Kingdom of Italy face after 1861?
A north-south divide in wealth; few people speaking standard Italian; rural rebellion and banditry in the south; conflict with the Pope over Rome.
3How did the Franco-Prussian War help complete Italian unification?
France withdrew its troops from Rome to fight Prussia in 1870, so Italian forces took Rome.
4Why did Alsace-Lorraine matter for the future?
Its annexation left lasting French resentment and desire for revenge, poisoning Franco-German relations (a background cause of World War I, studied in The World since 1900).
5Explain why Zionism emerged in the 1890s.
Jewish nationalists such as Herzl argued Jews needed their own state because antisemitism persisted even in liberal countries (for example the Dreyfus affair in France) and violent attacks occurred in the Russian Empire.
Challenge
1Compare Italian and German unification using three criteria.
Leadership: Italy combined Cavour's diplomacy with Garibaldi's popular volunteers; Germany was led by Bismarck and the Prussian army. Methods: both used wars and plebiscites/treaties, but Germany relied more on war. Outcome: Italy became a constitutional monarchy with deep regional divides; Germany became an authoritarian, industrial great power. Both were unified mainly from above, Germany more so.
2Was nationalism a liberating or a destructive force in the nineteenth century?
Liberating: freedom for Greeks, Serbs and Latin Americans from imperial rule; popular participation; Italian and German self-determination. Destructive: Russification and pressure on minorities; antisemitism; justification for imperialism abroad; rivalry that fed later wars. A balanced answer says it depended on who defined the nation and who was excluded.
3Evaluate the claim that nations are "invented" rather than ancient, using evidence from this lesson.
Invented: Italy needed to "make Italians"; few spoke standard Italian; states used schools, flags and holidays to build identity. Ancient: peoples did share older languages, religions and histories (Greeks, Poles). Conclusion: nations drew on older materials but were shaped and spread by modern states and movements.
Check your understandingQuiz
1. Who led the volunteer Redshirts in the conquest of Sicily and Naples in 1860?
2. Which policy is most associated with Bismarck?
3. What created the German Empire in 1871?
4. What was the Compromise of 1867?
5. When did Rome become part of the Kingdom of Italy?
6. Russification is an example of nationalism being used to:
For parents and teachersBig idea: This lesson covers nationalism and unification under D2 (war and conflict), D3 (national identity) and D1 (political developments). It practises analysing the role of individuals versus forces (A1.4) and reaching a balanced conclusion (A1.7).
How to help: Ask your teen what makes them feel Canadian (or part of another community) and whether those feelings come from symbols, stories, language or experience. Connect this to how Italy and Germany built national identities.
Common difficulties: Mixing up the Italian figures (Mazzini the idea, Cavour the diplomat, Garibaldi the soldier); listing Bismarck's wars without explaining what each achieved; seeing nationalism as only positive or only negative.