Grade by Grade
C. The World, 1650–1789 · The World, 1650–1789

The Scientific Revolution and the Global Exchange of Knowledge

C3 C1 A1.2 A1.4About 70 minutes
Learning goals
  • I can explain the main ideas of the Scientific Revolution, including Newton's synthesis and the experimental method.
  • I can describe how new institutions (societies, academies, journals) changed how knowledge was made and shared.
  • I can explain how knowledge from Asia, Africa and the Americas contributed to science in this period.
  • I can analyse how science was connected to empire, religion and gender.
  • I can use a primary source to trace how an idea moved between cultures.

Words to know

Scientific Revolution
The transformation of ideas about nature in Europe (roughly 1543 to 1700s), based on observation, experiment and mathematics.
empiricism
The idea that knowledge comes from observation and experience.
universal gravitation
Newton's law that every mass attracts every other mass with a force that depends on their masses and the distance between them.
scientific society
An organization of people who share and test scientific work, such as the Royal Society of London.
inoculation (variolation)
Deliberately giving a healthy person a mild case of smallpox, using material from a sufferer, to protect them from a severe case.
binomial nomenclature
Linnaeus's two-part Latin naming system for living things, such as Homo sapiens.
bioprospecting
Searching other regions for useful plants and knowledge, often relying on local and Indigenous experts.

A new way of knowing

In 1650, most educated Europeans still learned about nature from ancient authorities, such as Aristotle, and from scripture. By 1789, they increasingly trusted observation, experiment and mathematics, checked by other investigators. Historians call this change the Scientific Revolution.

It began earlier, with Copernicus's sun-centred model (1543), Kepler's laws of planetary motion and Galileo's telescope. Between 1650 and 1789 it became organized: societies, academies and journals turned private discoveries into public, testable knowledge. And it was never purely European: knowledge travelled along the same routes as trade and empire.

Newton's synthesis

In 1687 Isaac Newton published the Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica (Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy). He showed that the same laws of motion and the same law of universal gravitation explain a falling apple, the tides, the orbit of the Moon and the paths of the planets. The heavens and the Earth obeyed one set of mathematical laws.

Newton's work was a model for later thinkers: if nature followed rational laws, perhaps society, government and the economy did too. That idea fed the Enlightenment (next lesson).

Other landmarks:

  • Robert Boyle's experiments with an air pump led to Boyle's law (1662) relating gas pressure and volume.
  • Robert Hooke's Micrographia (1665) used the word cell; Antonie van Leeuwenhoek in Delft described tiny living things seen through his microscopes in the 1670s.
  • Edmond Halley used Newton's laws to predict that a comet would return in 1758. It did, after his death, and now bears his name.
  • Carl Linnaeus's Systema Naturae (1735) began the system of classifying living things that biologists still use.
  • Antoine Lavoisier showed that mass is conserved in chemical reactions and named oxygen; his chemistry textbook appeared in 1789.
Science, 1660–1789 (spacing to scale)1660Royal Societyfounded1665First scientificjournals1687Newton'sPrincipia1721Inoculation inLondon and Boston1735Linnaeus,Systema Naturae1758Halley's cometreturns as predicted1789Lavoisier'schemistry textbook
Science became organized and cumulative between 1660 and 1789. Spacing is to scale.

Making knowledge public

Scientists began to work in communities. The Royal Society of London was founded in 1660; the Académie royale des sciences in Paris in 1666. In 1665 the first scientific journals appeared, including the Royal Society's Philosophical Transactions. Members described experiments in detail so others could repeat them. This is the ancestor of today's peer review, which you will meet in every university science course.

Observeand measureHypothesisa testable ideaExperimentcontrol variablesMathematicsdescribe a lawPublishothers test itResults that others can repeat become accepted; results that fail are revised.New institutions made this cycle social: the Royal Society (1660),the Paris Academy of Sciences (1666) and the first scientific journals (1665).
The experimental method as practised by the new scientific societies. The key change was that results had to be shared and repeated by others.

Knowledge from around the world

The Scientific Revolution drew on knowledge from many cultures, often without giving credit.

  • China. Jesuit missionaries in Beijing served the Qing as astronomers. The Kangxi emperor studied Euclid's geometry with them, and Jesuits reported Chinese knowledge back to Europe.
  • India. Jai Singh II, ruler of Amber (Jaipur), built large stone observatories in the 1720s–1730s, including the Jantar Mantar in Delhi and Jaipur, and compiled astronomical tables drawing on Islamic, Hindu and European astronomy.
  • The Americas. Andean healers used cinchona bark against fevers; Europeans learned of it and called it "Jesuit's bark". Its active ingredient, quinine, later became a key treatment for malaria. The naturalist Maria Sibylla Merian studied insects in Suriname (published 1705) with help from Indigenous and enslaved African informants.
  • The Ottoman Empire, Africa and Asia: inoculation. Smallpox killed or scarred millions. In the Ottoman Empire, parts of Africa, China and India, people practised inoculation. Lady Mary Wortley Montagu, wife of the British ambassador in Istanbul, described it in a 1717 letter, had her son inoculated there and promoted it in London in 1721. That same year in Boston, an enslaved West African man named Onesimus explained the practice to the minister Cotton Mather, who promoted it during an epidemic.
How smallpox inoculation travelled (a knowledge network)Ottoman Empirewomen practitionersinoculate childrenWest Africapractice known toOnesimusChina and Indiaolder methods ofinoculationLady Mary WortleyMontagu writes home(1717); London 1721Boston, 1721Onesimus tellsCotton MatherInoculation spreads in Europe and the Americas;Jenner's cowpox vaccine follows in 1796also reportedin European writing
Inoculation reached Britain and its colonies through several routes. The knowledge came from Ottoman, African and Asian practice, carried by people of very different status.

Science, empire, religion and gender

  • Empire. Botanical gardens (such as Kew in London) and expeditions gathered plants of economic value, such as cinchona, tea, sugar and spices. Science and colonial profit were closely linked.
  • Religion. Most scientists of the period were religious believers; Newton wrote more about theology than physics. Many saw science as revealing God's design. Conflict between science and religion was real at times but is often exaggerated.
  • Gender. Women were mostly excluded from universities and societies, but some found ways in. Émilie du Châtelet translated Newton's Principia into French with her own commentary (published 1759). Laura Bassi became a professor at the University of Bologna in 1732 and later held its chair of experimental physics. Merian funded her own expedition.
  • Race. Some naturalists, including Linnaeus, also classified human beings into ranked groups. These ideas were not supported by evidence, but they were later used to justify slavery and colonial rule. Modern genetics shows they are false.
Worked example

Modelled example: Tracing an idea through a primary source

In a 1717 letter from Istanbul, Lady Mary Wortley Montagu described how older women performed "engrafting" (inoculation) at gatherings each autumn, putting a small amount of smallpox matter into scratches on children's skin. She wrote that she intended to try it on her son. (This is a paraphrase.) What can this source tell us?

  1. Origin: a private letter by an aristocratic Englishwoman living in the Ottoman capital, who had herself survived smallpox and lost her brother to it.
  2. Content: it describes a local medical practice carried out by Ottoman women, its timing and method, and its success.
  3. Perspective: she is an outsider observing; she may simplify, and she writes for an English audience. But she had strong personal motives to get the facts right.
  4. Corroborate: the Royal Society had received reports of the same practice from physicians in Istanbul (1714); Onesimus's account in Boston shows a separate African source of the same knowledge.
  5. Significance: the letter shows knowledge flowing from the Ottoman world to Britain, the opposite direction from the usual story of science spreading outward from Europe.

The letter is good evidence that inoculation was a known Ottoman practice and that Europeans learned it there. Together with Onesimus's account, it challenges the idea that modern medicine was purely a European invention.

Just for fun

Funny but true: The Royal Society agreed to publish Newton's Principia in 1686 but had spent its publishing budget on a lavish book called The History of Fish. Edmond Halley paid for the printing of Newton's masterpiece himself.

Hands-on activity

Repeat a classic experiment: the pendulum

You need: a string about 1 m long, a small weight (a washer or a few keys), tape, a phone stopwatch, and a ruler. Ask a grown-up to help tape the string to the edge of a table or doorframe.

  1. Hang the weight on the string and pull it a little to the side (a small angle). Let go and time 10 complete swings.
  2. Repeat with a heavier weight but the same length. Then repeat with a shorter string (about 25 cm).
  3. Record results in a table. What changes the time of a swing: mass or length?
  4. Write up your method so that someone else could repeat it exactly, as members of the Royal Society did.

Look for: the mass makes almost no difference, but a shorter string swings faster (a 25 cm pendulum takes about half the time of a 1 m pendulum). Galileo studied this, and pendulum clocks (Huygens, 1656) made accurate timekeeping possible.

Your turn

1

What did Newton's Principia (1687) show?

2

Why were scientific societies and journals important?

3

How did Halley's comet support Newton's theory?

4

Who was Onesimus, and why is he important in the history of medicine?

5

What did Jai Singh II build?

6

Name two women who contributed to science in this period.

7

Give one way science was linked to empire.

More practice: warm-up

1

In what year was the Royal Society founded?

2

Who published the Principia?

3

What naming system did Linnaeus create?

4

Who described tiny living things seen through microscopes in the 1670s?

5

What disease did inoculation protect against?

More practice: on your own

1

Explain why Newton's work influenced thinking about society.

2

Why is "the Scientific Revolution was purely European" a weak claim?

3

How did gender shape participation in science?

4

Why should historians be cautious with Linnaeus's human classifications?

5

Is Montagu's letter credible evidence about Ottoman medicine? Explain.

Challenge

1

"The Scientific Revolution was a revolution in institutions as much as in ideas." Assess this claim.

2

Assess the historical significance of smallpox inoculation, 1717–1796.

3

Explain how the same period produced both Newton's universal laws and racist human classifications. What does this tell us about "progress"?

Check your understanding

Quiz

1.

What did Newton's Principia (1687) explain?

2.

Which institution was founded in London in 1660?

3.

Who explained inoculation to Cotton Mather in Boston?

4.

What did Jai Singh II build in the 1720s and 1730s?

5.

Who translated Newton's Principia into French?

6.

Why did the return of Halley's comet in 1758 matter?

For parents and teachers

Big idea: This lesson addresses C3 (ideas and practices that shaped identity and heritage) and C1 (developments in science and technology), and practises selecting evidence (A1.2) and interpreting a primary source (A1.4).

How to help: Do the pendulum activity together (help attach the string safely). Ask your teen to write the method so someone else could repeat it. Then discuss: why does repeatability make knowledge more trustworthy?

Common difficulties: Seeing science as a list of European geniuses. Push for at least one non-European example in every answer, and for the social side: societies, journals, patrons and informants.

University link: Students heading into the sciences or history of science will meet these ideas again; the history of medicine is a growing field.