From experiment to equation
Scientists, engineers, kinesiologists, economists and data analysts all do the same thing: they measure something, look for a pattern, choose a model and use it to predict. Real measurements are never perfect, so the points do not land exactly on a line or curve. Your job is to see the overall shape and decide which model fits.
In this lesson you will model two home experiments: an elastic band stretched by washers, and a ball bouncing on the floor.
A non-linear model: the bouncing ball
Drop a ball from 100 cm and measure the height of each bounce (sample data):
Bounce number: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Height (cm): 100, 70, 49, 34, 24, 17
First differences: −30, −21, −15, −10, −7. They get smaller, so the relation is non-linear. Look at ratios instead: 70 ÷ 100 = 0.70, 49 ÷ 70 = 0.70, 34 ÷ 49 ≈ 0.69, 24 ÷ 34 ≈ 0.71, 17 ÷ 24 ≈ 0.71. Each bounce is about 70% of the one before.
Hands-on activityBounce lab
You need: a ball that bounces well (a tennis ball or rubber ball), a tape measure or metre stick taped to a wall, a hard floor, a helper, and (if you have one) a phone that records slow-motion video.
Part A (linear): drop the ball from 40, 60, 80, 100 and 120 cm. Measure the height of the first bounce each time. Plot drop height (x) against bounce height (y). Draw a line of good fit and find its equation. Does the line pass close to (0, 0)? Why would it?
Part B (non-linear): drop the ball from 100 cm and measure the first four or five bounce heights. Find the ratio between bounces. Predict the next bounce, then test it.
What to look for: in Part A the points are close to a line through the origin (direct variation: dropping from 0 cm gives a bounce of 0 cm). In Part B each bounce is about the same percent of the one before. Slow-motion video makes the top of each bounce much easier to read. Keep the area clear so nobody trips while chasing the ball.