B. Canada, 1890–1914: A Changing Society · Canada, 1890–1914: A Changing SocietyLaurier and French-English Relations
B3 B2 B1About 50 minutes
Learning goals- I can explain why Wilfrid Laurier's time as Prime Minister was significant.
- I can describe the Manitoba Schools Question, the South African War, the Naval Service Act and Regulation 17.
- I can explain how French Canadians and English Canadians often saw these issues from different perspectives.
- I can describe how Franco-Ontarians and Franco-Manitobans responded to limits on French-language schooling.
Words to know
compromise
A solution where each side gives up part of what it wants so that both can accept it.
imperialism
Here, the belief that Canada should strongly support Britain and the British Empire, including in its wars.
nationalism
Here, the belief that Canada (or French Canada) should put its own interests first and make its own decisions.
minority language rights
The rights of a group that speaks a language different from the majority, such as French speakers in Ontario, to use their language in schools and public life.
Franco-Ontarians
French-speaking people of Ontario. Their communities go back more than 300 years.
Regulation 17
A 1912 Ontario rule that limited French as a language of instruction to the first two years of elementary school.
Let's start with a question
Imagine your school suddenly announced that, after Grade 2, all your classes had to be taught in a language your family does not speak at home. How would your family feel? What would they do?
For many French-speaking families in Ontario and Manitoba between 1890 and 1914, this was not imaginary. Questions about language, religion, schools and Britain's wars caused some of the sharpest arguments in Canada at the time.
Wilfrid Laurier
Wilfrid Laurier was a lawyer from Quebec and the leader of the Liberal Party. In 1896 he became Canada's first French-Canadian Prime Minister. He stayed in office until 1911, one of the longest unbroken runs in Canadian history.
Laurier was famous for compromise. He believed Canada would only hold together if English and French Canadians each gave a little. He also believed in Canada's future, predicting that the twentieth century would belong to Canada.
But compromise has a cost: often neither side is fully happy. You will see this pattern again and again.
1. The Manitoba Schools Question
When Manitoba joined Canada in 1870, it had both Protestant and Catholic schools paid for with public money. Many Catholics there were French-speaking Métis and French Canadians.
By 1890, many English-speaking Protestant settlers had arrived. In 1890, Manitoba passed the Public Schools Act. It ended public funding for Catholic schools. Catholic families who wanted Catholic schools had to pay for them and still pay taxes for public schools.
French Canadians across Canada were angry. In 1896, Laurier made a deal with Manitoba's premier, Thomas Greenway, called the Laurier–Greenway Compromise:
- Catholic schools did not get their funding back.
- Religious teaching was allowed in public schools for half an hour at the end of the day, under certain conditions.
- Catholic teachers could be hired under certain conditions.
- French, like other minority languages, could be taught where there were enough students.
Later, in 1916 (after this unit), Manitoba banned teaching in languages other than English. French-speaking families kept French alive by supporting teachers who taught it anyway.
2. The South African War (1899–1902)
In 1899, Britain went to war in South Africa against the Boers, Dutch-speaking settlers who ran two independent republics there.
- Many English Canadians wanted Canada to send soldiers to help Britain, the "mother country".
- Many French Canadians did not see why Canadians should fight a British war far away. Some sympathized with the Boers as a small people resisting a great empire.
Laurier's compromise: the government would equip and send 1,000 volunteers, not a conscripted army. In the end, more than 7,000 Canadians served, including 12 nurses, and about 270 died, many from disease. At the Battle of Paardeberg in February 1900, Canadian troops were part of the first major British victory of the war.
Henri Bourassa, a young Liberal MP from Quebec, resigned his seat in October 1899 to protest sending troops without asking Parliament. He was re-elected unopposed in 1900 and became a leading voice for French-Canadian nationalism.
Laurier's compromise sat in the middle: Canada sent volunteers, not a conscripted army, so each side got part of what it wanted, and neither got all of it.3. The Naval Service Act (1910)
By 1910, Britain and Germany were racing to build warships. Britain wanted help from its empire.
Laurier's compromise was the Naval Service Act of 1910, which created the Royal Canadian Navy: a small Canadian navy that, in an emergency and with the government's decision, could be placed under British command.
- Many English-Canadian imperialists mocked it as a "tin-pot navy", far too small; they wanted Canada to give money directly to Britain's navy.
- Bourassa and Quebec nationalists opposed it because Canadians could be drawn into Britain's wars. In 1910 Bourassa founded the Montreal newspaper Le Devoir to argue his views.
Attacked from both sides, and also over a free-trade deal with the United States, Laurier lost the 1911 election to Robert Borden and the Conservatives.
4. Regulation 17 in Ontario (1912)
French-speaking communities have lived in what is now Ontario for more than 300 years. By the early 1900s, many Franco-Ontarian children went to bilingual schools.
In 1912, the Ontario government of Premier James Whitney issued Regulation 17. It limited French as the language of teaching and communication to the first two years of elementary school. In 1913 it was changed to allow French as a subject for one hour a day.
How Franco-Ontarians responded:
- In 1910, they had already formed an association (the ACFÉO) to protect the French language and schools. It led the fight.
- In 1913, the French-language newspaper Le Droit was founded in Ottawa to oppose Regulation 17.
- Many teachers kept teaching in French, and many families refused to obey. In January 1916, at École Guigues in Ottawa, parents occupied the school to protect teachers Diane and Béatrice Desloges. When police came to close it, mothers fought back with hatpins. People call this the Battle of the Hatpins.
Ontario dropped Regulation 17 in 1927. On 22 February 2016, Premier Kathleen Wynne formally apologized for it. Today Franco-Ontarians have their own French-language school boards.
| Issue | Many English Canadians felt | Many French Canadians felt | Outcome |
|---|
| Manitoba Schools (1890–1896) | One public school system with English would unite the province | Catholic and French rights promised in 1870 were being broken | Laurier–Greenway Compromise (1896) |
| South African War (1899–1902) | Canada should help Britain | It was Britain's war, not Canada's | Volunteers sent; more than 7,000 served |
| Naval Service Act (1910) | The navy was too small; send Britain more help | Canadians could be dragged into Britain's wars | Royal Canadian Navy created; Laurier lost in 1911 |
| Regulation 17 (1912) | Children in Ontario should learn in English | French-language education was under attack | Strong resistance; dropped in 1927 |
Two perspectives on four issues. These are general patterns: not every English or French Canadian agreed with their group. Four big French-English debates in about 25 years (years spaced to scale). Notice how the school questions in Manitoba and Ontario bracket the war and navy debates.Worked exampleModelled example: Reading a perspective
Read this imagined letter (not a real source): "My children were born in Ottawa, as I was. Why should the government decide that after Grade 2 they may not learn in the language of their grandparents?" Whose perspective is it, and what does it tell us?
- Ask who is speaking: a parent, born in Ottawa, whose family speaks French. This is likely a Franco-Ontarian parent around 1912.
- Ask what issue it is about: limits on French teaching after Grade 2. That matches Regulation 17.
- Ask what they feel and why: the writer feels their family belongs in Ontario (born there for generations) and sees the rule as unfair to their culture.
- Ask what other perspectives exist: the provincial government argued all Ontario children needed strong English for jobs and citizenship.
It is a Franco-Ontarian parent's perspective on Regulation 17. It shows that many saw the rule as an attack on their identity and rights. To understand the issue fully, we would compare it with sources from the government and English-speaking Ontarians.
Perspective is not the same as agreeing
When you explain why people supported Regulation 17 or opposed the navy, you are not saying they were right. Historical perspective means understanding why people thought as they did, based on their time and place. You can then make your own judgement, using evidence.
Just for funTry a Laurier-style compromise at home: one person wants pizza, another wants tacos, so you order... pizza tacos. Nobody is fully happy, which, Laurier might say, means it worked.
Hands-on activityKitchen-table debate: Should Canada send soldiers in 1899?
You need: two sheets of paper, a pencil and at least one other person.
- On one sheet write YES: Canada should send soldiers to help Britain. On the other write NO: this is not Canada's war.
- Each person takes one side (switch halfway if you like). Write three reasons a person in 1899 might have given. Use what you learned: loyalty to Britain, ties of family and empire, distance, cost, French-Canadian views, Canada making its own choices.
- Take turns: each side has one minute to speak.
- Now play Laurier: write one compromise that both sides might accept.
- Compare your compromise with what Laurier really did (1,000 volunteers, paid for and sent by Canada).
Look for: reasons that fit 1899, not today, and a compromise that gives each side something.
Your turn
1Why was Wilfrid Laurier's election in 1896 significant?
He was Canada's first French-Canadian Prime Minister, and he served until 1911.
2What did Manitoba's 1890 Public Schools Act do?
It ended public funding for Catholic schools, so Catholic families had to pay for their own schools and also pay public school taxes.
3Give two parts of the Laurier–Greenway Compromise.
Any two: Catholic schools did not get public funding back; religious teaching for half an hour at the end of the day; Catholic teachers could be hired under conditions; French and other languages could be taught where there were enough students.
4Why did many French Canadians oppose sending troops to South Africa?
They saw it as Britain's war, far away, and did not think Canadians should fight it. Some sympathized with the Boers.
5What did the Naval Service Act of 1910 create?
6What did Regulation 17 do?
It limited French as a language of teaching to the first two years of elementary school in Ontario (later allowing French as a subject for one hour a day).
7Name two ways Franco-Ontarians resisted Regulation 17.
Any two: teachers kept teaching in French; families refused to obey; the newspaper Le Droit was founded (1913); the ACFÉO organized opposition; parents defended École Guigues in the Battle of the Hatpins (1916).
More practice: warm-up
1Which political party did Laurier lead?
2Who won the 1911 election?
Robert Borden and the Conservatives.
3What newspaper did Henri Bourassa found in 1910?
4When did Ontario drop Regulation 17?
Dutch-speaking settlers in South Africa who ran two independent republics and fought Britain from 1899 to 1902.
More practice: on your own
1Explain why the Laurier–Greenway Compromise left both sides partly unhappy.
Catholics and French Canadians did not get their separate funded schools back, so they felt their rights were still broken. Some English Protestants disliked any religious teaching or French in public schools. A compromise gives each side only part of what it wants.
2Why did Henri Bourassa resign his seat in 1899?
To protest Laurier's government sending troops to the South African War without asking Parliament. He believed Canada should not be drawn into Britain's wars.
3Explain why the Naval Service Act was attacked from two sides.
English-Canadian imperialists thought the navy was too small and wanted more direct help for Britain (a "tin-pot navy"). French-Canadian nationalists like Bourassa feared it would pull Canadians into British wars. Laurier's middle path pleased neither.
4Why is the Battle of the Hatpins significant?
It shows ordinary families, especially mothers, actively defending French-language education. It became a symbol of Franco-Ontarian resistance to Regulation 17.
5Give one example of continuity and one of change in French-language education in Ontario, from 1912 to today.
Continuity: Franco-Ontarians still work to protect French language and culture, and French schools still exist. Change: instead of rules limiting French, Ontario now has French-language school boards run by Franco-Ontarians, and in 2016 the province apologized for Regulation 17.
Challenge
1Was Laurier's habit of compromise a strength or a weakness? Argue one side with two pieces of evidence.
Strength: compromises like volunteers for South Africa and the Laurier–Greenway deal kept the country together during dangerous divisions; he governed for 15 years. Weakness: compromises often failed minority rights (Catholic schools in Manitoba were not restored) and in 1911 he was attacked from both sides over the navy and lost. Either side is acceptable with evidence.
2How did the experiences of Franco-Manitobans and Franco-Ontarians between 1890 and 1916 follow a similar pattern?
In both provinces, as the English-speaking population grew, governments limited French and Catholic schooling (Manitoba 1890 and 1916; Ontario 1912). In both, French-speaking families resisted by organizing, supporting teachers and keeping French alive. The pattern shows how minority rights depended on the majority's political choices.
3Bourassa said Canada should be an "Anglo-French country" with equal rights for both cultures across the whole country. How is Canada today similar to and different from his vision?
Similar: English and French are official languages federally, and French-language education rights exist across Canada. Different: French is strong mainly in Quebec and some communities; most Canadians outside Quebec speak English at home. His vision also left out Indigenous nations and other communities, which many Canadians today see as part of Canada's foundation.
Check your understandingQuiz
1. Who was Canada's first French-Canadian Prime Minister?
2. What did the Laurier–Greenway Compromise allow?
3. How did Laurier handle the South African War?
4. Why did Henri Bourassa oppose the Naval Service Act?
5. What did Regulation 17 (1912) do?
6. What was the Battle of the Hatpins?
7. Which is the best example of historical perspective?
For parents and teachersBig idea: This lesson covers significant political events and people of 1896–1912 (B3), compares French- and English-Canadian perspectives (B2), and connects minority-language rights then and now (B1).
Ontario connection: Regulation 17 is Ontario history. If you live near Ottawa, Sudbury, Hearst, Penetanguishene or another Franco-Ontarian community, look for local French schools, the Franco-Ontarian flag (a green part with a white lily on the left and a white part with a green trillium on the right) or Le Droit.
How to help: Ask your child to explain one issue from both sides before saying what they think. Encourage "many" rather than "all" ("many French Canadians opposed...").
Common difficulties: Mixing up the Manitoba Schools Question (religion and funding, 1890) with Regulation 17 (language, Ontario, 1912); thinking Laurier was against Britain (he sought a middle path).