C. Energy and Momentum · Work, Energy and Simple Harmonic MotionDamped Harmonic Motion, Shock Absorbers and Perpetual Motion
C3.4 C3.2About 70 minutes
Learning goals- I can describe underdamped, critically damped and overdamped motion and explain damping using energy.
- I can calculate the energy lost when the amplitude of an oscillator decreases.
- I can explain how a shock absorber uses damping to control a car's suspension.
- I can use the law of conservation of energy to explain why a perpetual motion machine is impossible.
Words to know
damping
The gradual loss of mechanical energy from an oscillating system, which makes its amplitude decrease.
underdamped
Lightly damped: the system oscillates with decreasing amplitude.
critically damped
Damped just enough to return to equilibrium as quickly as possible without oscillating.
overdamped
Heavily damped: the system returns to equilibrium slowly without oscillating.
shock absorber
A damper, usually an oil-filled piston and cylinder, that converts the kinetic energy of suspension motion into thermal energy.
perpetual motion machine
An impossible device that would run forever and deliver work without any energy input.
Why the bouncing stops
Push down on the corner of a parked car and let go. It rises, maybe dips once, and settles. A playground swing left alone slows to a stop. A guitar note fades. Real oscillators lose mechanical energy, and the motion dies away. This lesson explains damped harmonic motion, how engineers use it in shock absorbers, and why the law of conservation of energy means a perpetual motion machine can never work.
Damped harmonic motion
In ideal SHM, mechanical energy stays at ½kA² forever. In real systems, non-conservative forces such as air resistance, friction and fluid drag do negative work on every cycle. This is called damping. Since E = ½kA², losing energy means the amplitude shrinks.
- Underdamped: light damping. The object oscillates with a gradually shrinking amplitude (a swing, a guitar string). With light fluid drag, the amplitude typically drops by about the same fraction each cycle, so it decays exponentially (as in the MHF4U unit Exponential and Logarithmic Functions).
- Critically damped: just enough damping that the object returns to equilibrium as quickly as possible without overshooting.
- Overdamped: heavy damping. The object creeps back to equilibrium slowly without oscillating, like a door closer that is set too stiff.
The period of a lightly damped oscillator is almost the same as without damping; it is the amplitude that changes.
Position against time for the same oscillator with three levels of damping. Light damping lets it oscillate with shrinking amplitude; critical damping returns it fastest without overshoot; heavy damping returns it slowly.Shock absorbers
A car's suspension has two parts at each wheel. The coil spring supports the car and stores energy when the wheel hits a bump. On its own, the spring would let the car bounce up and down for many cycles (try the period calculation in Simple Harmonic Motion of a Mass on a Spring). The shock absorber (damper) is a piston in a sealed cylinder of oil. When the suspension moves, oil is forced through small holes in the piston. That fluid friction does negative work and turns the oscillation's mechanical energy into thermal energy in the oil, which is then lost to the surrounding air.
Designers aim close to critical damping, usually staying slightly underdamped: firm enough to stop bouncing within about one cycle, but not so stiff that every bump is passed straight to the passengers. When shocks wear out, the car keeps bouncing after bumps, which reduces tire grip and control.
The same idea protects tall buildings. Taipei 101, a skyscraper in Taiwan, has a huge steel pendulum near its top: a tuned mass damper that swings against the building's sway and, with hydraulic dampers, turns its energy into thermal energy.
One corner of a car's suspension. The coil spring stores energy from a bump; the shock absorber's piston forces oil through small holes, converting the oscillation's energy into thermal energy so the bouncing dies out quickly.Why perpetual motion is impossible
A perpetual motion machine is a device that would run forever and keep delivering useful work with no energy input. Inventors have proposed overbalanced wheels with rolling weights, water wheels that pump their own water back up, and magnet motors for centuries. None has ever worked, and the conservation laws explain why:
- Energy cannot be created. A machine that delivers work must take that energy from somewhere. If nothing is put in, the stored energy runs down. A machine claiming to put out more energy than it takes in breaks the law of conservation of energy.
- Real machines have non-conservative forces. Friction, air resistance and electrical resistance turn some energy into thermal energy on every cycle. Even a machine that only kept itself moving would slowly run down, like a damped oscillator.
- Even with zero friction, a machine could at best keep its energy. The moment you take useful work out of it, its energy decreases.
(University physics adds a second barrier from the second law of thermodynamics: you cannot turn thermal energy completely back into work. That is beyond this course.)
Worked exampleExample 1: Energy lost in one cycle
A mass on a spring has an amplitude of 10 cm. After one cycle its amplitude is 8.0 cm. What percentage of its mechanical energy was lost?
- E = ½kA², so E₂/E₁ = (A₂/A₁)² = (8.0 ÷ 10)² = 0.64.
- Energy kept: 64%. Energy lost: 36%.
36% of the energy was lost in one cycle, even though the amplitude dropped only 20%.
Worked exampleExample 2: How many cycles to halve the amplitude?
A lightly damped oscillator keeps 95% of its amplitude each cycle. After how many cycles is the amplitude half its starting value?
- After n cycles: A = A₀(0.95)ⁿ. Set (0.95)ⁿ = 0.5.
- Take logarithms: n = log 0.5 ÷ log 0.95 = (−0.3010) ÷ (−0.02228) = 13.5.
- So after about 14 cycles the amplitude is below half.
About 14 cycles. The energy halves much sooner: (0.95²)ⁿ = 0.5 gives n ≈ 6.8 cycles.
Worked exampleExample 3: What a shock absorber must do
A car wheel hits a bump and compresses its spring (k = 3.0 × 10⁴ N/m) by 5.0 cm. How much energy must the shock absorber remove to stop the bouncing?
- Ee = ½kx² = ½(3.0 × 10⁴)(0.050)² = 37.5 J.
- Without a damper, most of this energy would come back as bouncing, cycle after cycle.
- With good damping, most of the 37.5 J becomes thermal energy in the oil within about one cycle.
About 38 J per bump at this wheel. Over a long drive on a rough road, the oil can become noticeably warm.
Worked exampleExample 4: Testing a perpetual motion claim
An inventor proposes a water wheel that drives a pump, which lifts the water back up to drive the wheel again. The wheel is 80% efficient and the pump is 70% efficient. What fraction of the energy is left after one full loop? After three loops?
- Fraction after one loop: 0.80 × 0.70 = 0.56.
- After three loops: 0.56³ = 0.18.
- Each loop delivers less water to the top than the loop before, so the machine slows and stops. Even with 100% efficient parts, it could only keep running; taking any useful work out would run it down.
56% after one loop, 18% after three. It cannot run forever, let alone power anything else.
Just for funIn 1775 the French Academy of Sciences in Paris got so tired of perpetual motion proposals that it announced it would no longer examine any. Two and a half centuries later, inventors are still sending them in to other places.
Hands-on activityDamp a pendulum
You need: a string about 1 m long, a bob (a heavy nut or a few washers), tape, an index card, a protractor, a ruler and a phone stopwatch.
- Hang the pendulum from the top of a door frame or a high shelf so it swings freely. Pull it to 20° and release. Count the swings until the amplitude falls to about 10° (half). Estimate the angle with the protractor held behind the string; a helper makes this easier. Also time 10 swings.
- Tape the index card to the string just above the bob, like a sail facing the direction of motion. Repeat step 1.
- Compare the number of swings to reach half amplitude, and the period, with and without the card.
What to look for: with the card, the amplitude halves in far fewer swings, because air resistance does more negative work each cycle. The period should be almost the same in both cases: damping changes how long the motion lasts, not how long each swing takes. Discuss which setup is more like a car with good shock absorbers.
Your turn
1An oscillator's amplitude drops from 10 cm to 9.0 cm in one cycle. What fraction of its energy remains?
(9.0 ÷ 10)² = 0.81 (81%; 19% was lost).
2Which kind of damping returns an object to equilibrium fastest without overshooting?
3Why does a car need shock absorbers as well as springs?
Springs alone would let the car keep bouncing after each bump. Shock absorbers convert the oscillation's energy into thermal energy so the bouncing dies out quickly, keeping the tires in contact with the road.
4An oscillator has 0.40 J of energy. Damping reduces its amplitude to half. How much energy does it have now?
E ∝ A², so it has ¼ of the energy: 0.10 J.
5State the main reason a perpetual motion machine is impossible.
It would have to deliver energy without an energy input, violating the law of conservation of energy; and real machines always lose some energy to thermal energy through friction.
6A door closer lets a door creep shut slowly without swinging back. What type of damping is that?
Overdamped (or close to critical if it is set well).
More practice: warm-up
The loss of mechanical energy from an oscillating system because of non-conservative forces, which makes the amplitude decrease.
2Into what form does a shock absorber turn mechanical energy?
Thermal energy (in the oil).
3Does light damping change the period much?
No, mainly the amplitude.
4Give an everyday example of an underdamped oscillator.
For example, a playground swing or a plucked guitar string.
5What is a perpetual motion machine?
A device that would run forever and deliver work without any energy input.
More practice: on your own
1A pendulum's amplitude falls by 4.0% each swing. What fraction of its amplitude and of its energy is left after 10 swings?
Amplitude: 0.96¹⁰ = 0.66. Energy: 0.66² = 0.44 (or 0.9216¹⁰).
2An oscillator keeps 95% of its amplitude per cycle. After how many cycles is its energy halved?
Energy ratio per cycle 0.95² = 0.9025. n = log 0.5 ÷ log 0.9025 = 6.8, so after about 7 cycles.
3A car spring (k = 2.5 × 10⁴ N/m) is compressed 8.0 cm by a pothole. How much energy must the damper remove?
½(2.5 × 10⁴)(0.080)² = 80 J.
4A website sells a "magnet motor" that supposedly runs forever and powers a house with no fuel. Use physics to evaluate the claim.
Magnets can store energy, but the force from a fixed arrangement of magnets is conservative: around a closed cycle it does zero net work. Powering a house means taking energy out continually with no input, which violates conservation of energy. The claim is false.
5An overbalanced wheel has weights that roll outward on one side. Why does it not keep turning?
When the whole wheel is analysed, the turning effects of the weights on both sides balance (more weights sit on the inner side), so there is no net driving effect; and friction removes energy each turn. It stops, in agreement with conservation of energy.
Challenge
1Show that if an oscillator keeps a fraction r of its amplitude each cycle, it keeps r² of its energy, and find how many cycles it takes to lose 99% of its energy when r = 0.90.
E = ½kA², so E₂/E₁ = (rA)²/A² = r². For 99% lost: (0.81)ⁿ = 0.01, n = log 0.01 ÷ log 0.81 = 21.9, so about 22 cycles.
2Someone argues: "In space there is no air and no friction, so a spinning wheel in space could power a satellite forever." Evaluate the argument.
A frictionless wheel would keep spinning, but the moment you take energy out to power the satellite, the wheel's kinetic energy decreases by the same amount. Without an energy input it must eventually stop. The argument confuses keeping motion with supplying energy.
3A car designer can choose shock absorbers that make the suspension underdamped, critically damped or overdamped. Describe the ride with each and recommend one.
Underdamped: the car bounces several times after bumps (comfortable but poor control). Overdamped: the suspension returns slowly and can still be compressed when the next bump arrives, so the ride feels harsh. Critically damped (or slightly under it): returns fastest without bouncing, a good balance of comfort and control. Recommend close to critical damping.
Check your understandingQuiz
1. Damping in an oscillating system is caused by:
2. An oscillator's amplitude is halved by damping. Its energy is now:
3. A well-designed car shock absorber is close to:
4. A shock absorber works by:
5. Which statement explains why a perpetual motion machine cannot deliver useful work forever?
6. For a lightly damped pendulum, what happens to the period as the amplitude decreases?
For parents and teachersBig idea (C3.4, C3.2): in real oscillators, non-conservative forces remove mechanical energy, so the amplitude shrinks (damping). Engineers use damping deliberately in shock absorbers. The same conservation law shows that perpetual motion machines are impossible.
How to help: push down on the corner of a parked car together and count the bounces (one rebound is normal; several suggests worn shocks). Ask your teen to explain where the energy goes.
Common difficulties:
- Thinking damping changes the period a lot (it mainly changes the amplitude).
- Forgetting that energy depends on amplitude squared.
- Believing a frictionless machine could supply energy forever (it could only keep moving).
- Confusing critical damping (fastest return without overshoot) with overdamping.