B. Biochemistry · BiochemistryInvestigation: Planning and Reporting an Enzyme Experiment
B2.5 B3.4 A1.1 A1.2 A1.4 A1.5 A1.6 A1.8 A1.10 A1.11 A1.12 A1.13About 75 minutes
Learning goals- I can write a testable question and a hypothesis with a scientific reason for an enzyme investigation.
- I can identify independent, dependent and controlled variables, choose equipment, and plan a safe procedure with replicates and controls.
- I can process data (means, rates, uncertainty), graph it, and draw a conclusion that is justified by the evidence.
- I can evaluate sources of error and report an investigation in a standard lab-report format.
Words to know
hypothesis
A testable prediction with a reason based on scientific knowledge: "If…, then…, because…".
independent variable
The variable you deliberately change (for example, temperature).
dependent variable
The variable you measure to see the effect (for example, time for a disc to float).
controlled variables
Everything you keep the same so that only the independent variable can cause a change.
replicate (trial)
A repeat of the same treatment. Replicates show how much results vary and allow a mean to be calculated.
rate
How fast a reaction happens. When you measure the time for a fixed amount of change, rate is proportional to 1 ÷ time.
random error / systematic error
Random errors scatter results unpredictably (reduced by more trials). Systematic errors shift all results the same way (fixed by changing the method or equipment).
optimum
The value of a condition (such as temperature or pH) at which an enzyme works fastest.
From "what happens" to "how do we know"
You know that temperature affects enzymes. But how would you show it, convincingly enough that another scientist would believe your numbers? That is what this lesson is about: planning, carrying out and reporting a real investigation into a cellular process.
The skills here (writing a hypothesis, controlling variables, handling uncertainty, judging evidence) are exactly the ones first-year university biology labs grade most heavily.
Step 1: Question and hypothesis (A1.1)
Start with a testable question that names one independent and one dependent variable:
How does temperature affect the rate at which catalase breaks down hydrogen peroxide?
Then a hypothesis with a reason:
If the temperature increases from 10 °C to about 40 °C, then the rate will increase, because molecules move faster and collide more often with the active site; above about 40 °C the rate will decrease, because the enzyme begins to denature and its active site loses its shape.
Step 2: Variables and equipment (A1.2)
- Independent variable: temperature (10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60 °C, using water baths).
- Dependent variable: the time for a filter-paper disc soaked in catalase to float up through hydrogen peroxide. The enzyme produces oxygen bubbles (2 H₂O₂ → 2 H₂O + O₂), which stick to the disc and lift it. Rate = 1 ÷ time.
- Controlled variables: H₂O₂ concentration and volume; disc size and soaking time; enzyme source and concentration (one extract, for example from potato or liver, used for everything); depth of liquid; pH; time each tube spends in the water bath before testing.
- Controls: a disc soaked in water (no enzyme), and a disc soaked in boiled extract, should not float within the test time.
- Equipment: beakers or test tubes, water baths with thermometers, filter-paper hole punch, forceps, stopwatch, graduated cylinders.
Step 3: Procedure and safety (A1.4, A1.5)
- Equilibrate the H₂O₂ and the enzyme extract at each temperature for 5 minutes.
- Soak a disc in extract for 5 s, drain it, and drop it into the H₂O₂. Start timing when it touches the bottom; stop when it reaches the surface.
- Do three trials at each temperature with fresh discs.
Safety: wear goggles. Lab hydrogen peroxide (often 3%) irritates eyes and skin, so rinse spills with water. Use care with hot water baths and glassware. Wash hands after handling raw liver.
Other classic versions of this lab: amylase and starch, sampled every 30 seconds onto a spot plate of iodine until no blue-black colour appears; or a gas-pressure sensor measuring the O₂ produced by catalase.
Worked exampleExample: Processing the data (A1.6, A1.13)
Here are simulated class results: times (s) for the disc to float, three trials at each temperature.
- 10 °C: 29, 31, 30
- 20 °C: 17, 19, 18
- 30 °C: 12, 13, 11
- 40 °C: 10, 9, 11
- 50 °C: 14, 16, 15
- 60 °C: 55, 64, 61
Calculate the mean time, the rate, and the range for each temperature, and state the optimum.
- Mean = sum ÷ 3. 10 °C: (29 + 31 + 30) ÷ 3 = 30.0 s. Likewise 20 °C: 18.0 s; 30 °C: 12.0 s; 40 °C: 10.0 s; 50 °C: 15.0 s; 60 °C: (55 + 64 + 61) ÷ 3 = 60.0 s.
- Rate = 1 ÷ mean time. 10 °C: 1 ÷ 30.0 = 0.033 s⁻¹; 20 °C: 0.056 s⁻¹; 30 °C: 0.083 s⁻¹; 40 °C: 0.100 s⁻¹; 50 °C: 0.067 s⁻¹; 60 °C: 0.017 s⁻¹.
- Range (a simple measure of spread) = highest − lowest. Most temperatures: 2 s. At 60 °C: 64 − 55 = 9 s, so those trials varied much more.
- Precision: times were measured to the nearest second, so rates are rounded to three decimal places; more digits would claim more precision than the data have.
- Optimum: the fastest rate is at 40 °C. Because the next readings are 30 and 50 °C, the true optimum lies somewhere between about 30 and 50 °C; testing at 35 and 45 °C would narrow it down.
Means: 30.0, 18.0, 12.0, 10.0, 15.0, 60.0 s. Rates: 0.033, 0.056, 0.083, 0.100, 0.067, 0.017 s⁻¹. The rate peaks at 40 °C (optimum between about 30 and 50 °C).
Rate (1 ÷ mean time) against temperature for the simulated class data. The rate rises to a peak near 40 °C, then falls steeply as the enzyme denatures.Step 4: Analysis and conclusion (A1.8, A1.10)
Conclusion: the rate of catalase activity increased from 10 °C to a maximum at about 40 °C and decreased sharply above that, which supports the hypothesis. Use evidence: "The rate at 40 °C (0.100 s⁻¹) was three times the rate at 10 °C (0.033 s⁻¹), and at 60 °C it fell to 0.017 s⁻¹."
Evaluation: ask what could have affected the results.
- Random error: human reaction time with the stopwatch; discs catching on the side of the tube. The wider range at 60 °C suggests extra variability, possibly because the enzyme was denaturing during the trial. More trials would help.
- Systematic error: if the water bath was really 2 °C cooler than the thermometer said, every point would shift. Calibrate thermometers. If discs absorbed different volumes of extract, use a dropper to add a fixed volume.
- Limitations: only six temperatures; the curve's shape between readings is a guess. The disc method measures O₂ production indirectly.
- Improvements: use 5-degree steps near the peak; use a gas-pressure sensor for a direct, continuous measurement.
Never say a result proves a hypothesis; say it supports or does not support it.
Step 5: The lab report (A1.11)
A standard report has: Title; Purpose/Question; Hypothesis; Variables; Materials; Procedure (numbered, past tense or instructions as your teacher asks); Observations (a data table with units and uncertainties, and qualitative notes); Analysis (calculations shown once, then graphs with titles, labelled axes and units); Conclusion (answer the question, refer to data, accept or reject the hypothesis); Evaluation (sources of error, limitations, improvements); and References (in a consistent citation style, such as APA).
Planning your own: a safe home investigation
You can carry out a real enzyme investigation at home with the protease in kiwifruit (called actinidin), which digests gelatin, a protein. Fresh pineapple contains a similar protease (bromelain). In Grade 11 you compared fresh, boiled and canned pineapple. Now you will design a quantitative test of how pre-heating temperature affects the enzyme.
There is a design trap: set gelatin melts if it gets warm (around body temperature), so you cannot test the enzyme at high temperatures on the gelatin itself. Instead, you heat-treat the juice at different temperatures, cool it, and then let every sample act on gelatin in the fridge. The independent variable is therefore the temperature the enzyme was exposed to, which measures denaturation (thermal stability).
The home investigation: equal volumes of kiwi juice, pre-heated to different temperatures and cooled, act on set gelatin in the fridge. The volume of gelatin turned to liquid measures how active the protease still is.Just for funSome jelly-dessert recipes warn you never to add fresh pineapple or kiwi. That isn't fussy cooking advice: it's enzyme kinetics, printed on a recipe card.
Hands-on activityKiwi protease vs temperature: a full investigation
Grown-up needed for the knife, the stove and hot water.
You need: 2 or 3 ripe kiwis, a box of plain gelatin or jelly powder, a kettle, a pot, a kitchen thermometer that reads to 100 °C, 6 identical small clear cups (about 125 mL; 12 if you can do two trials each), 6 small heat-proof jars or mugs, a fork and a fine strainer, a measuring spoon or medicine syringe (to measure 10 mL), masking tape and a marker, a timer, and paper towel.
- Day 1: make the gelatin following the package. Pour the same volume (about 60 mL) into each cup, label them, and refrigerate overnight so they set completely.
- Day 2: peel and mash the kiwis and press the pulp through the strainer to collect juice (you need about 50 mL).
- Put 10 mL of juice in each of 5 jars. Label: raw, 40 °C, 60 °C, 80 °C, boiled. Put 10 mL of water in the sixth (control).
- With a grown-up, heat a pot of water to 40 °C (check with the thermometer). Stand the 40 °C jar in it for 5 minutes, keeping the temperature steady. Repeat for 60 °C and 80 °C. For boiled, hold the jar in boiling water for 5 minutes. Let all jars cool to room temperature.
- Pour each 10 mL sample onto the surface of its gelatin cup. Return all cups to the fridge for 24 hours.
- Measure: tilt each cup over a measuring spoon or syringe and collect all the liquid. Volume digested = volume of liquid − 10 mL. Record it in a table.
- Graph volume digested against pre-heating temperature. Write a report with the headings in Step 5 above.
What to look for: the raw-juice cup should have the most liquid. The amount should fall as the pre-heating temperature rises, and the boiled juice should behave like the water control (little or no liquid). A strong report names the controlled variables (juice volume, gelatin volume and concentration, fridge time, cup size), explains why the water control matters, and discusses at least two sources of error (for example, juice that wasn't fully cooled may have softened the gelatin by heat alone; the heating temperatures drifted).
Your turn
1Write a testable question for an investigation of how pH affects amylase activity.
For example: How does pH (4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9) affect the time taken for amylase to completely digest a starch solution, as shown by the iodine test? It names the independent variable (pH) and the dependent variable (time to digest starch).
2For the catalase disc investigation, name the independent variable, the dependent variable and three controlled variables.
IV: temperature. DV: time for the disc to float (used to calculate rate). Controlled (any three): H₂O₂ concentration and volume; disc size; soaking time; enzyme extract concentration; depth of liquid; pH.
3Why is rate calculated as 1 ÷ time in the disc method?
Each disc floats when it has collected about the same amount of O₂. A shorter time means that amount was produced faster, so rate is proportional to 1 ÷ time.
4A student's three times at 30 °C are 12, 13 and 25 s. What should they do with the 25 s result?
It is an anomaly (much higher than the others). They should check for a mistake (disc stuck to the side, timing error). If a cause is found, they can repeat that trial and note it; they should not quietly delete it. Reporting it and explaining the decision is part of honest data handling.
5Explain the purpose of the boiled-extract control.
Boiling denatures the enzyme. If the disc does not float, it shows that the floating in other trials was caused by active enzyme, not by something else in the extract or the peroxide.
6Why should you say results "support" rather than "prove" a hypothesis?
Experiments have error and limitations, and other explanations or future data might not fit. Science accepts conclusions provisionally, based on the weight of evidence.
More practice: warm-up
1What is the variable you deliberately change called?
The independent variable.
2Why do scientists repeat each treatment several times?
To see how much results vary and to calculate a more reliable mean.
3Name one piece of safety equipment for an enzyme lab using hydrogen peroxide.
4What does "optimum temperature" mean?
The temperature at which the enzyme works fastest.
5Name one section that must appear in a lab report.
Any of: title, purpose, hypothesis, variables, materials, procedure, observations, analysis, conclusion, evaluation, references.
More practice: on your own
1A disc floated in 8.0 s, 8.5 s and 9.0 s. Find the mean time and the rate, with sensible precision.
Mean = (8.0 + 8.5 + 9.0) ÷ 3 = 8.5 s. Rate = 1 ÷ 8.5 = 0.12 s⁻¹ (two significant figures, matching the data).
2In the kiwi investigation, why can't you simply put gelatin cups in ovens at 40, 60 and 80 °C to test the enzyme at those temperatures?
Gelatin melts at warm temperatures, so the gelatin would turn liquid even without any enzyme. You couldn't tell enzyme digestion from melting. Pre-heating the juice and then testing everything cold avoids this confounding variable.
3Classify each error as random or systematic: (a) a thermometer that always reads 3 °C high; (b) a stopwatch started a little late in some trials.
(a) Systematic: it shifts every reading the same way. (b) Random: it varies from trial to trial.
4Sketch-describe a good graph for the catalase results.
A line graph (temperature is continuous) with temperature (°C) on the x-axis and rate (s⁻¹) on the y-axis, both axes labelled with units, a title, plotted points joined (or a smooth curve), and ideally error bars or the range shown at each point.
5The results show a peak at 40 °C. A student concludes, "The optimum temperature of catalase is exactly 40 °C." Evaluate this conclusion.
Too strong. Only 30, 40 and 50 °C were tested near the peak, so the true optimum could be anywhere from about 30 to 50 °C. Also, the optimum depends on the enzyme source and conditions. A better statement: "Under these conditions, the rate was highest at 40 °C; the optimum lies between about 30 and 50 °C."
Challenge
1Design an investigation to test the effect of substrate concentration on catalase activity. Include IV (with values), DV, three controlled variables, controls, number of trials, and the result you would expect.
IV: H₂O₂ concentration (for example 0.5%, 1%, 1.5%, 2%, 3%, made by dilution). DV: time for the disc to float (rate = 1 ÷ time). Controlled: temperature (room temperature or a 25 °C bath), volume and depth of solution, disc size and soaking time, enzyme extract concentration, pH. Controls: disc in water and in boiled extract. Trials: three or more at each concentration. Expected: rate increases with concentration at first, then levels off as the enzyme becomes saturated (approaching Vmax).
2In the kiwi investigation, a student finds that the 40 °C sample digested more gelatin than the raw sample. Suggest two possible explanations and how you would test each.
(1) Random variation: with one trial each, small differences aren't meaningful; repeat with 3 cups per treatment and compare means and ranges. (2) The juice wasn't fully cooled, so warm juice partly melted the gelatin; measure each sample's temperature before pouring, or let all samples sit in the fridge for 30 minutes first. (Another possibility is that mild warming really doesn't harm the enzyme, so 40 °C and raw are equal within error.)
3Calculate the percentage difference between the rate at 40 °C (0.100 s⁻¹) and the rate at 50 °C (0.067 s⁻¹), relative to the 40 °C value, and explain why the rate falls more steeply above the optimum than it rises below it.
(0.100 − 0.067) ÷ 0.100 × 100% = 33% lower. Below the optimum, the rate rises gradually because collision frequency increases gradually with temperature. Above the optimum, denaturation destroys active sites: once the protein unfolds, it stops working completely, and more molecules unfold each second at higher temperature, so activity drops off quickly.
Check your understandingQuiz
1. In an investigation of how temperature affects enzyme activity, temperature is the:
2. A disc took 20 s to float. What is the rate?
3. Which is the best hypothesis?
4. A thermometer that always reads 2 °C too low causes:
5. Why is the kiwi juice pre-heated and then cooled, instead of testing it at high temperatures on the gelatin directly?
6. The best way to reduce the effect of random error is to:
For parents and teachersBig idea: This lesson covers B2.5 (planning and conducting an investigation of a cellular process and reporting it) and the scientific investigation skills of strand A: questioning (A1.1), choosing equipment (A1.2), safety (A1.4), conducting (A1.5), recording (A1.6), analysing and evaluating (A1.8), concluding (A1.10), communicating (A1.11), representing data (A1.12) and calculating with correct precision (A1.13).
How to help: The kiwi investigation takes two days and needs adult help with the knife and hot water. Your teen should write the full lab report. Read it and ask: "Which variables did you keep the same? How do you know your result isn't just random?" A good report answers both.
Common difficulties:
- Writing a hypothesis with no reason ("because…").
- Listing "the same amount of everything" instead of naming specific controlled variables.
- Reporting too many decimal places (e.g., 0.0333333 s⁻¹) or claiming the experiment "proves" something.
- Forgetting that the controls (water, boiled juice) are what make the result convincing.