Grade by Grade
Oral Communication · Oral Communication: Critical Listening, Academic Discussion and Persuasive Speaking

Critical Listening: Hidden Agency, Loaded Language, Identity and Power

1.8About 70 minutes
Learning goals
  • I can identify how passive voice, nominalization and euphemism hide responsibility.
  • I can recognize presupposition, false dilemmas, naming choices and us-and-them framing.
  • I can analyse what an oral text suggests about beliefs, values, identity and power.
  • I can comment with understanding and sensitivity, aware of my own position as a listener.

Words to know

passive voice
A sentence form in which the doer of the action can be left out ("mistakes were made").
nominalization
Turning an action into a noun, which can hide who did it.
euphemism
A mild word or phrase used in place of a harsh or direct one.
presupposition
Something a statement or question assumes without arguing for it.
false dilemma
Presenting only two options when more exist.
framing
Presenting an issue so that one interpretation seems natural.
positionality
How a person's experiences, communities and beliefs shape what they notice and how they interpret.

Remember from Grade 11

In Grade 11 you asked three linked critical questions about oral texts: What point of view is represented? What is omitted to sustain it? Whose interests does it serve? You learned about vested interests and dominant perspectives, and tracked how a character's views changed across Macbeth. Grade 12 asks you to analyse perspectives and biases in more complex oral texts, where bias often hides in grammar and word choice rather than in open opinion, and to comment with understanding and sensitivity on the questions they raise about beliefs, values, identity and power. You'll also consider your own position as a listener.

Let's start with a press conference

After a spill from a (fictional) factory into a river, a spokesperson says: "We regret that a release occurred overnight. Out of an abundance of caution, we've notified the appropriate authorities. Early indications suggest minimal impact."

Every sentence may be accurate. But listen to what the grammar does. A release occurred: no one released anything. Out of an abundance of caution: the company sounds careful, not responsible. Early indications suggest: whose indications, measured how? A Grade 12 critical listener hears not only what is said but how the language shapes who looks responsible.

Where bias hides in language

  • Hidden agency. The passive voice (mistakes were made) and nominalization (turning actions into nouns: there was a release) can remove the person or organization responsible.
  • Euphemism. Mild words for harsh realities: downsizing for firing people, collateral damage for civilian deaths, a water event for a spill.
  • Naming choices. The same people or events can be named in ways that signal sympathy or hostility: rally, protest, disruption, riot; land defenders or protesters; newcomers or foreigners.
  • Presupposition. A statement or question that assumes something without arguing for it: "When will the council stop wasting money?" presupposes that it is wasting money.
  • False dilemma. Presenting only two options when more exist: "Either we build the highway or the town dies."
  • Us and them. Pronouns and labels that create an in-group and an out-group: "people like us", "real Canadians", "taxpayers" (as if some listeners aren't).

None of these is automatically dishonest. Euphemism can be kind (at a funeral), and every speaker has to choose names. Critical literacy means noticing the choice and asking what it does and for whom.

Watch the responsibility disappearActive"Our plant released 2000 L of waste into the river."actor: namedPassive"2000 L of waste were released into the river."actor: goneNominalized"There was a release into the river."actor, amount: goneEuphemism"A minor water event occurred."actor, amount, harm: goneEach version is grammatically fine. Each tells listeners less about who is responsible.
As the sentence moves from active to euphemism, the actor, the amount and finally the harm disappear. A critical listener asks: Who did what, how much, and why is that harder to hear in this version?

Beliefs, values, identity and power

The curriculum asks you to comment with understanding and sensitivity on the questions texts raise. Useful questions:

  • Beliefs and values: What does the speaker assume is normal, good or obvious? Would everyone in the audience agree?
  • Identity: Which groups are named, and how? Who is spoken about rather than with? Who is invisible?
  • Power: Who gets to speak, for how long, and with what authority? Whose words are treated as facts and whose as opinions?

Sensitivity means that your commentary respects the people a text discusses. When a text concerns a group you don't belong to, listen to what members of that group say about it, avoid speaking for them, and comment on the text's choices, not on the worth of the people.

Your own position

Every listener has a position: experiences, communities and beliefs that shape what we notice and what we miss. A Grade 12 critical listener considers this positionality and asks: Why does this text seem neutral to me? Would it seem neutral to someone with different experiences? Noticing your own position isn't a weakness. It makes your analysis more honest.

One event, five namesrallydemonstrationprotestdisruptionriotsympatheticmore neutralhostileThe speaker's word choice tells you their perspective before any facts do.
Before a speaker gives a single fact, the name they choose for an event signals a perspective. Notice which name is used, and ask what the other names would change.
Worked example

Let's analyse a corporate statement

Analyse the spokesperson's statement from the press conference above: "We regret that a release occurred overnight. Out of an abundance of caution, we've notified the appropriate authorities. Early indications suggest minimal impact."

  1. Hidden agency: a release occurred is nominalized and agentless; the company never says we released.
  2. Euphemism: release is softer than spill or discharge of waste.
  3. Framing: out of an abundance of caution presents a legal or required step as generous extra care.
  4. Vague evidence: early indications suggest minimal impact gives no source, numbers or measurements.
  5. Omissions: what was released, how much, how far it travelled, who uses the river (residents, farms, a downstream First Nation's drinking water, anglers), and what the company will do now.
  6. Power and interests: the statement serves the company's legal and reputational interests. Those with the least power here (people downstream) are not mentioned.
  7. Comment with sensitivity: the spokesperson may be limited by legal advice; the critique is of the statement's choices, and the key question is who needs information they aren't getting.

The statement uses agentless grammar (a release occurred), euphemism (release), favourable framing (abundance of caution) and unsourced reassurance (early indications). It omits the substance, the amount and the people affected downstream. It serves the company's interests; the people most affected are invisible in it. A fair comment notes legal constraints but asks who has a right to the missing information.

Worked example

Let's analyse a loaded question on a call-in show

A (fictional) radio host opens a segment: "Should the city keep wasting money on bike lanes nobody uses, or finally fix the roads that hard-working drivers actually depend on?"

Analyse the perspective and bias, and comment on what it reveals about values, identity and power.

  1. False dilemma: only two options (bike lanes or roads), though cities can fund both, or other priorities.
  2. Presuppositions: that bike lanes waste money and that nobody uses them, neither argued for.
  3. Identity framing: hard-working drivers gives drivers a positive identity; cyclists are left unnamed, implying they're not hard-working or not part of the we of the city.
  4. Who is omitted: people who cycle to work, people who can't afford a car, people who are too young to drive, and people who use mobility devices on lanes and paths.
  5. Power: the host controls the question, so callers start inside his frame. Even callers who disagree must first fight the presuppositions.
  6. A fairer question: "How should the city divide its transportation budget between roads, transit and bike lanes?"

The question is a false dilemma loaded with presuppositions (waste, nobody uses) and identity framing (hard-working drivers) that makes one group the real public. It omits cyclists, people without cars and people who use mobility devices. Because the host frames the debate, callers begin on his terms. A neutral version asks how to divide the budget, without assuming the answer.

Critique the choice, not the people

Strong critical commentary sounds like "The phrase 'hard-working drivers' frames drivers as the deserving public and leaves cyclists out," not "This host hates cyclists." Analyse what the language does; let the evidence carry the judgment.

Hands-on activity

Rewrite the news three ways

You need: a short radio or TV news report or press conference clip (1 to 2 minutes), paper and a pen.

  1. Transcribe two or three key sentences.
  2. Circle any passive voice, nominalization, euphemism, presupposition or naming choice.
  3. Rewrite one sentence three ways: in clear active voice, in a version that favours the organization, and in a version that favours the people affected.
  4. Read all three aloud to someone at home. Ask which sounds most neutral to them, and why.
  5. Write a short paragraph: whose interests does the original wording serve, who is missing, and how might your own position affect what you noticed?
Just for fun

Euphemism in the wild: my little brother described breaking a lamp as "the lamp experienced an unplanned disassembly."

Passive voice, nominalization and euphemism in one sentence. He's either in trouble or headed for a career in public relations.

Your turn

1

Rewrite in active voice: "Mistakes were made in the hiring process."

2

Identify the presupposition: "Why do teenagers refuse to read anymore?"

3

Name the device: "Either we cancel the trip or someone gets hurt."

4

Give a euphemism for fired, and say what it softens.

5

Why might calling a group "taxpayers" in a speech exclude some listeners?

6

What does it mean to comment on a text with sensitivity?

7

What is your position as a listener, and why does it matter?

More practice: warm-up

1

What is nominalization?

2

Is euphemism always dishonest?

3

Name two words for the same event that signal different perspectives.

4

Which pronoun phrase can create an in-group: "people like us" or "some people"?

5

Name the three areas of questions the curriculum asks you to comment on, besides beliefs.

More practice: on your own

1

Explain how the passive voice can serve someone's interests, with an example.

2

A podcast about a northern community interviews three outside experts and no residents. Analyse what this suggests about power.

3

Rewrite this loaded question neutrally: "How long will we let the school board ignore parents?"

4

Why should a critical listener consider their own position?

5

A speaker refers to "land defenders", while another speaker calls the same people "protesters blocking the road." Analyse both choices.

Challenge

1

Write a short (four to five sentence) commentary on the power dynamics of a televised panel in which the host interrupts some guests often and lets others finish. Comment with sensitivity.

2

Find the presupposition, the false dilemma and the identity framing in this (fictional) campaign line: "Real Ontarians are tired of paying for programs they never asked for. It's time to choose: lower taxes or more waste."

3

Argue whether a speaker can ever be fully neutral. Use at least two ideas from this lesson.

Check your understanding

Quiz

1.

Which sentence hides who is responsible?

2.

"When will the council stop wasting money?" contains:

3.

"Either we build the highway or the town dies" is:

4.

Calling a spill "a minor water event" is an example of:

5.

Commenting on a text with sensitivity means:

6.

A listener's position matters because:

For parents and teachers

Big idea: ENG4U expectation 1.8 (critical literacy) asks students to identify and analyse perspectives and biases in oral texts, including increasingly complex texts, and to comment with understanding and/or sensitivity on questions about beliefs, values, identity and power.

How to help at home:

  • When a news report or ad uses a word like "incident" or "event," ask together: "What actually happened, and who did it?"
  • Notice how different news sources name the same event, and talk about why.
  • Model respectful critique: talk about what a speaker's words do rather than labelling the speaker.

Common difficulties:

  • Calling everything biased. All speakers make choices; the question is what those choices do and for whom.
  • Attacking people instead of analysing language. Steer back to specific words and their effects.
  • Assuming their own view is neutral. Ask, "Would this sound neutral to someone with different experiences?"

Some examples in this lesson touch on public controversies. Discuss them calmly and encourage your teen to listen to the people most affected.