Grade by Grade
C. Civic Engagement, Service, and Action · Civic Engagement, Service, and Action

Finding Reliable Civic Information

C1.5 A1.2 A1.3About 70 minutes
Learning goals
  • I can name reliable places to find information about civic matters.
  • I can explain how algorithms, ads and false information shape what I see online.
  • I can use the SIFT method and lateral reading to check a claim.
  • I can tell facts from opinions and news from opinion pieces.

Words to know

digital literacy
The skills to find, understand, judge, create and share information using digital tools, safely and responsibly.
algorithm
A set of computer rules; on social media, it decides which posts appear in your feed.
misinformation
False or misleading information shared by people who may believe it is true.
disinformation
False information created or shared on purpose to mislead.
lateral reading
Leaving a website to check what other trusted sources say about it and its claims.
primary document
An original record, such as a law, council minutes, a budget or an official statement.
opinion piece
Writing that argues a point of view (editorials, columns), as opposed to a news report of facts.
deepfake
A fake video, image or audio made with artificial intelligence to look or sound real.

Did the library really close?

A post appears in your feed: "BREAKING!!! Town council votes to CLOSE the library forever." It has thousands of shares. Your friends are angry. Should you be?

Civic life depends on information. To vote, sign a petition or speak at a meeting, people need accurate information about what governments and communities are doing. In this lesson you will learn where to find it and how to check it.

Where civic information lives

  • Government sources (primary documents): municipal websites post council agendas, minutes and budgets; the Legislative Assembly of Ontario and the House of Commons publish Hansard (the record of debates) and bills; Elections Canada and Elections Ontario explain how to vote; Statistics Canada publishes data.
  • News media: local newspapers and radio, national outlets, and the public broadcaster CBC/Radio-Canada. CPAC broadcasts the House of Commons. Professional news outlets have editors and correction policies.
  • Community organizations: charities, advocacy groups and Indigenous organizations share information about their causes. Remember they have a point of view.
  • People: your councillor's office, your MPP's or MP's constituency office, librarians and teachers can answer questions or point you to sources.
  • Social media: fast and convenient, and many politicians and governments post there. But anyone can post anything, so check before you trust.

How your feed is built

Social media apps use algorithms that choose what you see, often based on what keeps you scrolling. That can create a filter bubble: you mostly see views you already agree with. Emotional, surprising posts tend to spread fastest, whether or not they are true.

Watch for:

  • Misinformation: false information shared by people who believe it.
  • Disinformation: false information spread on purpose.
  • Ads and sponsored posts that look like news.
  • Satire: jokes written to look like news.
  • Deepfakes and AI-generated images that look real.
  • Bots and fake accounts that make an idea look more popular than it is.
@RealNewz4U_2026joined last monthBREAKING!!! Town councilvotes to CLOSE the libraryforever. Share before theydelete this!!!12.4K sharesNew account,odd nameAll caps,emotional wordsPressure toshare fastNo link, no date,no sourceShares arenot evidence
A made-up social media post with its warning signs labelled. None of these signs proves the post is false, but each is a reason to check before you believe or share it.

Checking with SIFT and lateral reading

Professional fact-checkers do not stay on one page and read it carefully top to bottom. They read laterally: they open new tabs and check what other trusted sources say about the source and the claim. The SIFT method puts this into four steps.

SStopPause before youreact or share.IInvestigateWho is behind it?Look them up.FFind betterWhat do trustedsources say?TTraceFollow the claim toits original source.
The SIFT method, developed by digital-literacy researcher Mike Caulfield, is a quick routine for checking information you find online. It takes a minute or two, not an hour.

Fact, opinion and evidence

A fact can be checked: Council voted 6 to 3 on March 10. An opinion is a judgement: Council made a terrible decision. Opinions are a normal part of civic life, but a strong opinion is backed by evidence.

News outlets publish both news reports (what happened) and opinion pieces (columns and editorials that argue a view). Both can be useful. Just know which one you are reading. Checking for bias means asking whose perspective a source shows and what it might leave out.

Worked example

Let's SIFT the library post

Use SIFT to check the post: "BREAKING!!! Town council votes to CLOSE the library forever."

  1. Stop: Notice your reaction (anger) and the warning signs: all caps, pressure to share, no link.
  2. Investigate the source: The account joined last month and posts only dramatic claims. No real name or organization. Low credibility.
  3. Find better coverage: Search the town's name plus library council vote. The local newspaper reports that council voted to close one branch for six months for repairs and move programs to the community centre.
  4. Trace to the original: The town website's council minutes confirm the vote: temporary closure for roof repairs, reopening planned for the fall.
  5. Conclude: The post twisted a real event into a false claim.

The claim is false and misleading: the library is closing temporarily for repairs, not forever. A short check of the council minutes and local news shows the truth. Do not share the post; if you comment, share the accurate source.

Credit your sources

When you share civic information in an assignment, a presentation or online, say where it came from (author or organization, title, date, link). In school work, use the citation style your teacher asks for. Citing sources lets others check your facts and makes your work more credible.

Just for fun

Why did the fact-checker break up with the meme?

It had no sources, too many filters, and it kept sharing things it did not understand.

Hands-on activity

Two-source challenge

You need: a device with internet access and a grown-up nearby.

  1. Find one civic claim in your feed or in the news this week (about your town, Ontario or Canada).
  2. Apply SIFT. Write down what you did at each step.
  3. Find two independent credible sources about the claim, including one primary document if possible (council minutes, a government news release, a bill).
  4. Decide: true, false, misleading, or not enough evidence yet. Explain in two sentences.
  5. Look at your own feed for five minutes and list three posts. For each, is it news, opinion, ad, satire or personal?

What to look for: specific steps, real sources with titles and dates, and a careful conclusion ("not enough evidence yet" is an acceptable answer).

Your turn

1

Name three reliable places to find information about what your municipal council has decided.

2

What is the difference between misinformation and disinformation?

3

What do the four letters of SIFT stand for?

4

What is lateral reading?

5

How can an algorithm create a filter bubble?

6

Is "The new bike lanes are a waste of money" a fact or an opinion? How could it be supported?

7

Why should you cite your sources when you share civic information?

More practice: warm-up

1

What is Hansard?

2

Name one warning sign that a post may be unreliable.

3

What is a deepfake?

4

Is an editorial a news report or an opinion piece?

5

Which agency explains how to vote in federal elections?

More practice: on your own

1

A video shows a well-known politician saying something shocking. It has no source and appears only on unknown accounts. What should you do?

2

Why is a council's official minutes a stronger source than a post about the meeting?

3

An advocacy group's website says a new highway will "destroy" a wetland. How credible is it and how would you check?

4

Explain why emotional posts spread fast and why that matters for civic life.

5

Your friend shares a satirical article as if it were real. How could you respond respectfully?

Challenge

1

Design a five-point checklist that a Grade 9 student could use before sharing any civic post. Explain one point.

2

Some people say social media platforms should remove false posts; others worry this gives companies too much power over speech. Explain both perspectives.

3

Explain how the same event could be reported differently by two credible outlets, and how you would build an accurate picture.

Check your understanding

Quiz

1.

Which is a primary document about a council decision?

2.

What does the T in SIFT stand for?

3.

False information spread on purpose to mislead is called:

4.

Lateral reading means:

5.

Which statement is an opinion?

6.

Why might your feed show mostly views you already agree with?

For parents and teachers

Big idea: The first part of expectation C1.5 asks students to explain ways to access information about civic matters, highlighting digital literacy and critical thinking. This lesson connects with strand A skills (selecting evidence, judging credibility and bias).

How to help: Do the two-source challenge together using a local story. Show your teen how you decide what to trust, and admit when you have been fooled; it normalizes checking. Look at your town's website together to find council minutes.

Common difficulties: Teens may think a post with many shares or a polished look must be true, or may distrust everything. Aim for careful trust: check, then decide. "Not enough evidence yet" is a valid conclusion.