B. Foundations of Language · Foundations of Language: Listening, Speaking, Words, Fluency and ConventionsListening to Analyze: Strategies, Clarifying Questions and Evidence from Oral Texts
B1.2 A1.1 A2.3About 70 minutes
Learning goals- I can choose listening strategies to use before, during and after listening to a talk, podcast or presentation.
- I can use signal phrases, tone and visuals to find a speaker's main points and evidence.
- I can take split-page notes that separate main ideas from supporting details.
- I can ask questions that clarify what a speaker meant.
- I can choose relevant evidence from an oral text and use it to support my own response.
Words to know
oral text
Any message communicated by speaking: a lecture, podcast, speech, interview, discussion or video narration.
signal phrase
Words a speaker uses to show how ideas are organized: the main reason is, for example, however, to sum up.
split-page notes
A note page divided into a narrow column for main ideas, a wide column for details and evidence, and a strip at the bottom for a summary and questions.
clarifying question
A question that checks or fixes your understanding of what was said: "What did you mean by...?"
relevant evidence
Facts, examples or quotations that directly support the specific point you are making.
attribute
To say who said something or where it came from: "According to the host..."
concession
When a speaker admits a point on the other side, such as "That's a fair concern."
Remember from Grade 8
In Grade 8 you listened for claims and evidence, judged evidence such as statistics, expert statements and anecdotes, noticed non-verbal clues like emphasis and tone, and asked for clarification. In Grade 9 you will hear more long oral texts: teachers explaining new concepts, guest speakers, documentaries and podcasts. You need a plan for listening, a way to take notes you can actually use, and the skill of using what you heard as evidence in your own response.
Let's start with a podcast
Here is part of a script from an invented local podcast, The Riverside Report. Read it aloud, or have someone read it to you, and listen as if you can't see the words.
"Today's question: should Riverside plant 500 new trees along Main Street? The first reason is shade. Last July, the town measured sidewalk temperatures: in full sun the pavement reached 48 degrees Celsius, but under the three old maples by the library it was 31. [pause] The second reason, and this is the big one, is stormwater. Tree roots and the soil around them soak up rain that would otherwise rush into storm drains. Now, some business owners worry that roots will crack the sidewalks. That's a fair concern. The town says it will use larger planting pits so roots have room to grow down instead of up. So, to sum up: more shade, less flooding, and a plan for the sidewalks."
What were the two reasons? Which one did the host say mattered most? How did you know? (The words "this is the big one" and the pause before it are clues.)
A listening plan: before, during and after
Before listening: know your purpose (Will you be tested? Are you deciding something? Are you responding in a discussion?). Preview the title or topic and predict what the main points might be. Set up a notes page.
During listening: listen for signal phrases that show structure. Note the claims and the evidence for each. Pay attention to how things are said: emphasis, pauses, tone, and any slides or gestures. Mark anything confusing with a ? instead of stopping.
After listening: summarize in one or two sentences. Go back to your ? marks and ask clarifying questions if you can. Check whether the evidence was strong enough. Then respond: agree, disagree or add, using what you heard as support.
A three-stage listening plan. Before: get ready. During: track structure, claims and evidence. After: summarize, clarify and respond.| Signal type | Listen for | What it tells you |
|---|
| Main point | the main idea is, today's question, what I want to argue | This is the claim or topic. |
| Order | first, the second reason, finally, the last step | A new point is starting. |
| Example or evidence | for example, last July we measured, according to, research shows | Support is coming. |
| Emphasis | this is the big one, the key thing is, above all | This point matters most. |
| Contrast or concession | however, on the other hand, some people worry, that's fair | The speaker is dealing with the other side. |
| Conclusion | so, to sum up, in the end, what this means is | A summary is coming; check your notes against it. |
Signal phrases are the speaker's road signs. They are even more important when listening than when reading, because you can't scroll back.Split-page notes
When you listen, you can't write everything. Split-page notes help you separate big ideas from details:
- Left column (narrow): main ideas and signal words: the topic, Reason 1, Reason 2, Concern.
- Right column (wide): details and evidence for each idea: numbers, examples, short quotations. For podcasts and videos, add the time (for example 1:15) so you can find it again.
- Bottom strip: after listening, a one- or two-sentence summary and any questions.
Use abbreviations and arrows (→ for leads to, vs for compared with). Notes are for you; they don't need full sentences.
Split-page notes for the Riverside podcast. Main ideas on the left, evidence with times on the right, and a summary and question at the bottom.Seeking clarification
If something isn't clear, ask. A good clarifying question is specific:
- Vague: "I didn't get it."
- Specific: "When you said 'larger planting pits,' do you mean deeper holes, or wider spaces in the sidewalk?"
- Specific: "Was the 31 degrees measured on the same day as the 48 degrees?"
In a recording you can't ask, so write the question down and look for the answer in another source or ask your teacher. In a live talk, wait for the question period or a natural pause.
Using oral evidence in your response
Often you must respond to what you heard: in a discussion, a reflection or a short written answer. Good evidence from an oral text is:
- Relevant: it supports the exact point you are making, not just the general topic.
- Accurate: it's what the speaker actually said, not what you remember vaguely. Check your notes.
- Attributed: you say who said it: "According to the host of The Riverside Report..."
A simple pattern is Point, Evidence, Explain: make your point, give the evidence, then explain how the evidence supports the point.
Worked exampleLet's build a response with oral evidence
Using the Riverside podcast, write a short response to the question: Does the host make a convincing case for planting the trees?
- Decide your point. Mostly yes: the host gives measured evidence and deals with the main objection.
- Choose relevant evidence for that point. The temperature measurements (48 °C vs 31 °C) support the shade reason. The planting-pit plan shows the host dealt with the sidewalk concern.
- Attribute it. "According to the host..."
- Explain the link. Measured numbers are stronger than opinions, and answering the objection makes the argument fairer.
- Note a limit (optional but strong). The stormwater reason is called "the big one" but has no numbers, so a listener might want more evidence for it.
The host makes a mostly convincing case. According to the podcast, the town measured 48 °C on sunny pavement but only 31 °C under the maples, which shows real evidence for the shade benefit. The host also addresses the concern about roots cracking sidewalks by describing larger planting pits. However, the stormwater reason, which the host calls "the big one," has no numbers to support it, so I would want more evidence before fully agreeing.
Non-verbal clues count as information
When you analyze an oral text, notice how it's delivered: what the speaker emphasizes, where they pause, whether their tone changes when they mention the other side, and what their slides or gestures highlight. These clues often point to what the speaker thinks matters most.
Hands-on activityPodcast or newscast notes
You need: paper, a pen, and a short (3 to 5 minute) podcast, radio segment or news report chosen with a parent (for example from CBC Radio or a public library's online collection).
- Before: write the title and predict two things it might say.
- Draw a split-page layout: a narrow left column, a wide right column and a strip at the bottom.
- During: listen once without pausing. Put main ideas and signal phrases on the left, evidence and times on the right. Mark any ?
- After: write a two-sentence summary and one clarifying question.
- Tell a family member your summary, then use one piece of evidence from your notes to explain whether you found the segment convincing.
Just for funA podcast host was asked why she always explained her main point three times.
She said, "Because my listeners can't scroll up." (It's true: repeating key points is a real strategy for oral texts.)
Your turn
1Name two strategies to use before listening to a guest speaker.
Any two: know your purpose; preview the topic or title; predict main points; set up a notes page; think of what you already know.
2Which signal phrase tells you a speaker is about to give their most important point: for example, above all, or on the other hand?
Above all. It signals emphasis. For example signals evidence, and on the other hand signals contrast.
3In the Riverside podcast, what concession does the host make?
The host admits that business owners' worry about roots cracking sidewalks is "a fair concern."
4Rewrite this vague question as a specific clarifying question: "What?" (after a speaker says the project will be "carbon neutral").
Sample: "When you say the project will be carbon neutral, do you mean it won't produce any emissions, or that it will balance its emissions some other way?"
5Why is it useful to write the time (like 1:15) next to notes from a podcast?
So you can find that exact part again to check the wording, quote it accurately, or listen again to something confusing.
6Is this evidence relevant to the point "Trees help prevent flooding"? Evidence: "In full sun the pavement reached 48 degrees."
No. The temperature evidence supports the shade point, not flooding. Relevant evidence would be the host's statement that roots and soil soak up rain that would otherwise go into storm drains.
7Write a one-sentence summary of the Riverside podcast.
Sample: The host argues that planting 500 trees on Main Street would provide shade and reduce flooding, and that the town has a plan to protect the sidewalks.
More practice: warm-up
1What goes in the left column of split-page notes?
Main ideas, topics and signal words.
2What goes in the bottom strip?
A short summary and any questions.
3What does the signal phrase to sum up tell you?
A conclusion or summary is coming.
4Give one example of a non-verbal clue in a talk.
Any of: a pause, emphasis on a word, a change in tone, a gesture, a facial expression, a highlighted slide.
5What does it mean to attribute evidence?
To say who said it or where it came from, for example "According to the host..."
More practice: on your own
1A speaker says, "Some people say a four-day school week saves money. However, parents would have to find child care on the fifth day." What is the speaker's likely position, and which signal word tells you?
The speaker likely opposes (or has doubts about) a four-day week. However signals a turn to the speaker's own point after mentioning the other side.
2You are taking notes on a science video about the water cycle. Write two left-column entries and matching right-column details.
Sample: Left: Evaporation / Right: sun heats water → water vapour rises. Left: Condensation / Right: vapour cools → tiny droplets form clouds. Any accurate pairing of a main idea with its detail works.
3Turn this into Point–Evidence–Explain: point = the host is fair; evidence = calls the sidewalk worry a fair concern.
Sample: The host is fair to the other side. The host calls the business owners' worry about roots "a fair concern" and explains how the town will deal with it. Admitting a real problem makes the host more trustworthy.
4A classmate wrote in their notes: "Host says trees stop all flooding." Is that accurate? Explain.
No. The host said roots and soil soak up rain that would otherwise go into storm drains, so trees reduce stormwater; the host never said they stop all flooding. Notes must not exaggerate what was said.
5Why might a speaker repeat their main point at the end of a talk?
Listeners can't go back and reread, so repeating the main point helps them remember it and check their understanding.
Challenge
1The Riverside host calls stormwater "the big one" but gives numbers only for shade. Write two clarifying or probing questions you would ask, and explain why.
Sample: "How much less water reaches the drains when a street has trees?" and "Has Main Street flooded in recent years?" Both ask for evidence for the reason the host says matters most, since that reason is currently supported only by explanation, not data.
2Explain how listening for evidence in English class helps you in another Grade 9 course.
Sample: in science, a teacher's demonstration or a documentary on ecosystems gives claims and data; noting the evidence (and the times) lets you use it accurately in a lab conclusion. In geography, a guest speaker's facts about a community can support an answer in an inquiry project. The same notes-and-evidence skills apply.
3Write a 3 to 4 sentence response to the Riverside podcast that disagrees with planting all 500 trees, using relevant, accurate, attributed evidence from the script.
Sample: I don't think the case for 500 trees is complete yet. The host says the town will use larger planting pits, but doesn't explain what they cost or whether they have worked on other streets. The host also calls stormwater "the big one" without giving any numbers for it. The town should share that information before planting all 500 trees. Look for: a clear point, evidence that really appears in the script, attribution, and an explanation.
Check your understandingQuiz
1. Which strategy belongs during listening?
2. The phrase "this is the big one" signals:
3. In split-page notes, evidence and details go:
4. Which is the most specific clarifying question?
5. Good evidence from an oral text must be relevant, accurate and:
6. A speaker says, "Some people worry about cost. That's fair." This is an example of:
For parents and teachersBig idea: Expectation B1.2 asks students to select and use listening strategies before, during and after listening, to analyze information communicated orally and non-verbally, to seek clarification, and to identify relevant evidence to support a response.
How to help at home: Listen to a short news story or podcast together (CBC Radio and public-library podcasts are good choices). Afterward ask: What was the main point? What evidence did they give? What would you want to ask the speaker?
Common difficulties:
- Trying to write everything. Encourage short notes, abbreviations and the two-column layout.
- Remembering the gist but not the exact evidence. Recording times in notes helps them check.
- Using evidence that is on the topic but doesn't support their specific point. Ask, "How does that prove what you just said?"
- Being shy about asking questions. Practise specific clarifying questions at home first.