A. Heritage and Identity · Communities in Canada, Past and PresentThe Indian Act and Residential Schools: Truth Before Reconciliation
A3.5 A2.5About 50 minutes
Learning goals- I can describe what the Indian Act is and how it affected First Nations communities.
- I can explain, in age-appropriate words, what residential schools were and why they were wrong.
- I can describe how First Nations, Métis and Inuit communities resisted, survived and are healing.
- I can compare the government's perspective at the time with the perspectives of survivors.
Words to know
Indian Act
A federal law first passed in 1876 that controls many parts of First Nations people's lives. It still exists today, with many changes.
assimilation
Trying to make a group give up its own language and culture and become like the larger group.
residential school
A school, paid for by the federal government and mostly run by churches, where First Nations, Métis and Inuit children were sent to live away from their families.
survivor
A person who attended a residential school and lived through it.
intergenerational
Passing from one generation to the next, from parents to children to grandchildren.
Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC)
A commission (2008 to 2015) that listened to survivors and wrote down the truth about residential schools. It made 94 Calls to Action.
reconciliation
Repairing a relationship that was harmed, by telling the truth, making things right and building trust.
Before we begin
This lesson is about something sad and true. It is OK to feel upset. Take breaks, ask questions and talk with a grown-up you trust. If your own family has a connection to residential schools, your family's feelings and teachings come first.
Remember from earlier grades
In Grade 2 you learned that many First Nations, Métis and Inuit children were sent to residential schools, where they were not allowed to speak their languages. In Grade 3 you learned about the Mohawk Institute in Brantford. In Grade 5 you learned that band councils were set up under the Indian Act. Now, in Grade 6, we look more closely at why these things happened and how communities are responding.
Let's start with a question
Imagine someone told you that you had to leave home, could not speak your family's language and would not see your family for months. How would you feel?
For more than a hundred years, this happened to many First Nations, Métis and Inuit children in Canada. Learning the truth is the first step to making things right.
The Indian Act (1876)
In 1876, the Government of Canada passed the Indian Act. First Nations did not agree to it. It gave the government control over many parts of First Nations people's lives:
- It decided who counted as a "status Indian" under the law.
- It set rules for reserves and created band councils under government control.
- From 1884, it banned some important ceremonies, such as the potlatch on the West Coast. The bans were not removed until 1951.
- For a long time, a First Nations woman who married a man without status lost her own status. This unfair rule was changed in 1985.
The main goal was assimilation: to make First Nations people give up their cultures and become like settlers. The Indian Act mostly applies to First Nations, not Métis or Inuit. It still exists today, though it has been changed many times, and many First Nations want to replace it with their own laws.
Residential schools
Residential schools were boarding schools paid for by the federal government and mostly run by churches. The first ones began in the 1800s (the Mohawk Institute took in boarding students from 1831). In 1920, the law made school attendance required for First Nations children, and many were sent to residential schools.
The Truth and Reconciliation Commission found that more than 150 000 First Nations, Métis and Inuit children attended. The last federally funded school closed in 1996.
What happened there:
- Children were taken far from their families, often for most of the year. Brothers and sisters were often kept apart.
- They were not allowed to speak their languages or practise their cultures. Many had their hair cut and their own clothes taken.
- Many children did not get enough food or care. Many were treated cruelly and hurt.
- Thousands of children died at the schools, and many never came home. Often their families were not even told.
In 1920, a senior government official, Duncan Campbell Scott, told a committee of Parliament that the goal was to continue until every First Nations person had been absorbed into the rest of Canada, so that First Nations would no longer exist as separate peoples.
A timeline (not to scale): 1831, the Mohawk Institute takes in boarding students; 1876, the Indian Act; 1920, school attendance required for First Nations children; 1996, the last federally funded residential school closes; 2008, the government apology and the start of the TRC; 2021, the first National Day for Truth and Reconciliation on September 30.Resistance and survival
First Nations, Métis and Inuit people were never passive.
- Parents wrote letters and petitions, and some hid their children so they would not be taken.
- Children whispered their languages in secret and kept their memories of home.
- Survivors grew up, raised families, and later bravely shared their stories so Canada would know the truth.
The harm was intergenerational: children who were not raised in their families sometimes found it hard to pass on their language and parenting traditions. Today, many communities are bringing back languages, ceremonies and family ties.
An intergenerational effect: harm done to children at school reached their own children too. Today, communities are working to bring their languages back.Steps toward reconciliation
- June 11, 2008: the Prime Minister apologised in the House of Commons for residential schools.
- 2008 to 2015: the Truth and Reconciliation Commission listened to more than 6 000 people and made 94 Calls to Action.
- Orange Shirt Day began in 2013. It comes from Phyllis Webstad, a Secwépemc girl whose new orange shirt was taken away on her first day at residential school in 1973, when she was six. Its message is Every Child Matters.
- September 30, 2021: Canada held the first National Day for Truth and Reconciliation.
- 2022: Pope Francis came to Canada and apologised for the role of members of the Catholic Church.
- Since 2021, many First Nations have been searching the grounds of former schools for the graves of children who never came home.
Worked exampleLet's compare perspectives
Compare two perspectives on residential schools: the government's stated goal at the time, and a survivor's experience.
- Government perspective (at the time): officials such as Duncan Campbell Scott said the goal was for First Nations to be absorbed into Canada and stop existing as separate peoples. They believed settler culture was better. That belief was wrong.
- Survivor perspective: survivors have described being lonely, punished for speaking their language, and missing their families, as well as their strength in getting through it.
- Evidence: the TRC gathered the stories of more than 6 000 people. That is a huge amount of evidence from people who were there.
- Conclusion: the evidence shows that the schools caused great harm. Today, the Government of Canada agrees: it apologised in 2008.
The government's goal was assimilation; survivors' experiences show the harm it caused. Comparing both, and looking at the evidence, leads to the conclusion that the schools were wrong, and Canada has apologised.
Worked exampleLet's connect cause and consequence
Explain one intergenerational effect of residential schools.
- Cause: children were punished for speaking their language at school.
- Consequence for them: many lost their language, or felt afraid to use it.
- Next generation: when they became parents, some could not, or did not want to, teach the language to their own children.
- Today: fewer people speak some Indigenous languages, so communities are running language classes and camps to bring them back.
Language loss passed from one generation to the next, and communities are now working to revitalise their languages.
Hands-on activityEvery Child Matters: learn and share
You need: paper, coloured pencils and a grown-up.
- With a grown-up, learn to say hello and thank you in an Indigenous language spoken near you. Examples: in Anishinaabemowin, boozhoo (hello) and miigwech (thank you); in Kanien'kéha (Mohawk), shé:kon (hello) and niá:wen (thank you); in Inuktitut, qujannamiik (thank you). Listen to a speaker online if you can, to hear the right sounds.
- Draw a small poster with the words Every Child Matters and one fact you learned in this lesson.
- Write one sentence about what reconciliation could look like in your school or family.
- On September 30, wear orange if you wish, and share your poster.
This is a gentle activity. It is fine to stop and talk at any point.
Your turn
1When was the Indian Act first passed?
2What was the main goal of the Indian Act and residential schools?
Assimilation: to make First Nations (and other Indigenous) people give up their cultures and become like settlers.
3Who paid for and who ran residential schools?
The federal government paid for them, and churches mostly ran them.
4About how many children attended residential schools, according to the TRC?
More than 150 000 First Nations, Métis and Inuit children.
5When did the last federally funded residential school close?
6Give two ways children were harmed at residential schools.
Any two: taken far from families; not allowed to speak their languages; siblings kept apart; not enough food or care; treated cruelly; many died.
7What is the message of Orange Shirt Day?
More practice: warm-up
1What does assimilation mean?
Trying to make a group give up its language and culture and become like the larger group.
A person who attended a residential school and lived through it.
3What date is the National Day for Truth and Reconciliation?
4How many Calls to Action did the TRC make?
5On what date did the Prime Minister apologise in the House of Commons?
More practice: on your own
1Name one ceremony the Indian Act banned, and when the ban ended.
The potlatch (banned from 1884); the bans ended in 1951.
2Explain what intergenerational harm means, using an example.
Harm that passes down through generations. Example: children punished for speaking their language could not easily teach it to their own children, so the language was lost in the next generation too.
3Give two ways First Nations, Métis and Inuit people resisted residential schools.
Any two: parents wrote letters and petitions; some hid children; children spoke their languages in secret; survivors later shared their stories.
4Why is the Indian Act still discussed today?
It still exists and still affects First Nations; many want to replace it with their own laws.
A Secwépemc survivor whose new orange shirt was taken on her first day at residential school in 1973, when she was six. Her story started Orange Shirt Day.
Challenge
1Why do people say there must be truth before reconciliation?
You cannot repair a relationship until the harm is honestly known and admitted. The TRC first gathered the truth from survivors, so that Canada could understand what happened and act to make it right.
2Duncan Campbell Scott's view in 1920 and the 2008 apology are both government statements. What does comparing them show?
It shows that the government's perspective changed: in 1920 it wanted assimilation; in 2008 it admitted that this was wrong and apologised. It is evidence that ideas about what is right can change over time.
3Choose one of the TRC's goals: bringing back Indigenous languages, or teaching all students about residential schools. Explain why it matters.
Model: teaching all students matters because people who know the truth can help prevent such harm again and can support reconciliation. (Or: languages matter because the schools tried to erase them, so bringing them back helps heal communities.) Any well-reasoned answer is correct.
Check your understandingQuiz
1. What was the main goal of residential schools?
2. When was the Indian Act first passed?
3. Who paid for residential schools?
5. What does Every Child Matters remind us of?
6. What did the Truth and Reconciliation Commission do?
7. Which is an example of resistance?
For parents and teachersBig idea: The Indian Act (1876) and the residential school system aimed to assimilate First Nations, Métis and Inuit peoples, causing deep and intergenerational harm; communities resisted and are leading healing and reconciliation (A3.5). Your child compares perspectives using evidence (A2.5).
Please read this lesson with your child. It is written for 11-year-olds: it names harm, cruelty and the deaths of children honestly but without graphic detail. Let your child's questions guide how far you go. If they ask about abuse, a simple, calm answer such as "some adults hurt children in ways that were very wrong" is enough at this age.
If this is personal: if your family has a connection to residential schools, your family's comfort and teachings come first; you may wish to talk with an Elder or your community. The National Indian Residential School Crisis Line is open 24 hours a day at 1-866-925-4419, and the Hope for Wellness Help Line at 1-855-242-3310. Children can reach Kids Help Phone at 1-800-668-6868 or by texting 686868.
How to help at home:
- Mark September 30 together (wear orange, attend a local event, read a picture book by an Indigenous author such as Phyllis's Orange Shirt by Phyllis Webstad).
- The Woodland Cultural Centre in Brantford offers public learning about the former Mohawk Institute.
- Learn a few words of a local Indigenous language together.
Common difficulties:
- Seeing Indigenous peoples only as victims: stress resistance, survival and the strength of communities today.
- "It was a long time ago": the last school closed in 1996; many survivors are parents and grandparents today.
- Blaming individual children's families: attendance was required by law from 1920.