You need: 17 number cards (ace to 10, any suits) and 3 face cards, so 20 cards in all. The face cards are the "defective bulbs".
- Shuffle the 20 cards well. Deal 4 cards and record the number of face cards (0, 1, 2 or 3). Return the cards and shuffle again.
- Repeat for 30 trials. (Working with a partner speeds this up.)
- Make a frequency table and draw a bar graph of your results, as a fraction of 30.
- Compare your bar graph with the theoretical one in Example 1.
- If an inspector wanted at least a 90% chance of finding a defective bulb, would a sample of 4 be enough? Use your results and the theory to explain.
What to look for: expected fractions about 0.49 (0 face cards), 0.42 (1), 0.08 (2) and 0.004 (3), so in 30 trials roughly 15, 13, 2 and 0. Your results will vary. A sample of 4 finds a defect only about 51% of the time, so the inspector needs a much larger sample (with 3 defective in 20, a sample of 11 gives P(at least one) = 1 − C(17, 11)/C(20, 11) ≈ 0.93, while a sample of 10 gives only about 0.89).